Pretty sure this is a good list. Don't see any impossible reaches. Anyone else?Anonymous User wrote:Hi everyone. Would love any critiques on this list. IT IS NOT YET IN ORDER. I will be ordering it based (roughly) on bid-interview conversion rates.
K-JD, Ivy undergrad, no ties. All in on New York. 1 H and 9 P's (H was in mushy elective).
Interested in (and resume speaks to) litigation. I feel very comfortable interviewing, and I think I have a good narrative about my 1L summer job (at a small firm).
Schulte Roth & Zabel
Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel
Cahill Gordon & Reindel
Allen & Overy
Bingham McCutchen
White & Case
Winston & Strawn LLP
Katten Muchin Rosenman
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
Sidley Austin LLP
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Chadbourne & Parke LLP
Proskauer Rose
Hogan Lovells
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy
Clifford Chance
Jenner & Block
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Floam
Jones Day
WilmerHale
Paul Hastings LLP
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
Weil Gotshal & Manges
Shearman & Sterling
Kaye Scholer
Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson
Ropes & Gray
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman
Brown Rudnick
Dechert
Greenberg Traurig
Morrison & Foerster
HLS EIP 2014 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- CicerBRo
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 5:42 pm
Re: HLS EIP 2014
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
Anybody know what the deal is with BSA/LR? When/how do they notify people? When is membership finalized? On some other forum I heard something about a BSA waitlist?
Just trying to figure out what's happening over the next few weeks.
Just trying to figure out what's happening over the next few weeks.
-
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:57 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
I don't mean this as an attack on your contributions specifically CicerBro, but this thread feels increasingly like the blind leading the blind. There are a bunch of bidlists that have been posted in the past few pages and they largely garnered either no response or response from others of us participating in OCI. Are there are 3Ls or alums out there who are lurking this thread? If so, your thoughts and critiques would be greatly appreciated as bidding season approaches.CicerBRo wrote:Pretty sure this is a good list. Don't see any impossible reaches. Anyone else?
The HLR website says calls go out starting next Monday, the 21st. No idea about BSAAnybody know what the deal is with BSA/LR? When/how do they notify people? When is membership finalized? On some other forum I heard something about a BSA waitlist?
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
I have heard Sullivan & Cromwell is like this. You will get an offer if you have good enough grades (5Hs or more). In my case, my screening and callback interviews were not that good, and I still got an offer.Anonymous User wrote:I'm a below-average interviewer with below-average softs but have above average grades (4 H's, 1 DS, 5 P's). I'm trying to find safeties, but it's tough figuring out whether the lower class sizes in lower-ranked firms would really give me a better chance than the larger class sizes of higher ranked firms. Does anyone know which firms really base their decisions heavily on grades?
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
if you dont mind me asking, what was your grade? is 5H an unofficial cutoff for S&C?Anonymous User wrote:I have heard Sullivan & Cromwell is like this. You will get an offer if you have good enough grades (5Hs or more). In my case, my screening and callback interviews were not that good, and I still got an offer.Anonymous User wrote:I'm a below-average interviewer with below-average softs but have above average grades (4 H's, 1 DS, 5 P's). I'm trying to find safeties, but it's tough figuring out whether the lower class sizes in lower-ranked firms would really give me a better chance than the larger class sizes of higher ranked firms. Does anyone know which firms really base their decisions heavily on grades?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
I had 2 DS's, 4 H's, and 4 P's. Yes. I heard that 5H's was the cutoff, but I do not remember where I heard that from. Maybe it was here.Anonymous User wrote:if you dont mind me asking, what was your grade? is 5H an unofficial cutoff for S&C?Anonymous User wrote:I have heard Sullivan & Cromwell is like this. You will get an offer if you have good enough grades (5Hs or more). In my case, my screening and callback interviews were not that good, and I still got an offer.Anonymous User wrote:I'm a below-average interviewer with below-average softs but have above average grades (4 H's, 1 DS, 5 P's). I'm trying to find safeties, but it's tough figuring out whether the lower class sizes in lower-ranked firms would really give me a better chance than the larger class sizes of higher ranked firms. Does anyone know which firms really base their decisions heavily on grades?
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
wwwcol wrote:I don't mean this as an attack on your contributions specifically CicerBro, but this thread feels increasingly like the blind leading the blind. There are a bunch of bidlists that have been posted in the past few pages and they largely garnered either no response or response from others of us participating in OCI. Are there are 3Ls or alums out there who are lurking this thread? If so, your thoughts and critiques would be greatly appreciated as bidding season approaches.CicerBRo wrote:Pretty sure this is a good list. Don't see any impossible reaches. Anyone else?
Original anon who posted the bid list.
I understand if you do not want the "blind" commenting on your bid list. I do not see it that way. Instead, I would appreciate the opportunity to get feedback on something important to me from other Harvard law students tasked with researching the same things. They may catch something I have missed, and that could make all the difference. Or not, but I think it is worth a try.
Of course - 3L's and alums are ideal. But I am a beggar, not a chooser, so I will take what I can get.
Please do not shout down people who comment on my list in a manner that will scare away others from doing so. I would appreciate their feedback as well, 20/20 vision or otherwise. It is fine if you do not want the advice, but do not hinder my access to it.
Cicerbro, and anyone else who is kind enough to take the time to give advice, thank you.
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
I know someone who has gotten BSA and someone who got waitlisted. I'm guessing no news is bad news in this case.Anonymous User wrote:Anybody know what the deal is with BSA/LR? When/how do they notify people? When is membership finalized? On some other forum I heard something about a BSA waitlist?
Just trying to figure out what's happening over the next few weeks.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 11:58 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
Hey all. I am a transfer from a T20, top 5 in my class. I am looking to practice corporate law ideally in NY/LA (MA, cap markets, PE) but would also be interested in VC/startup transactional work (SV). I just wanted to get some feedback on my bid list, and if anyone has any experiences or advice with regards to attempting three markets (NY, LA, and SV in my case) please let me know. Thanks.
1. Kirkland & Ellis
S&C
Cravath
Debevoise
Simpson Thacher
Jones Day
Cleary Gottlieb
Davis Polk
Weil, Gotshal
10. Latham (LA)
Gibson (LA)
WLRK (Wachtell)
Shearman
Skadden (LA)
Paul Weis
Sidley (LA)
Proskauer (LA)
Paul Hastings (LA)
Cooley (SV)
20. Fenwick (SV)
Gunderson (SV)
Wilson Sonsini (SV)
MTO (LA)
Fried, Frank, Harris
Willkie
White & Case
Milbank (LA)
Ropes & Gray
1. Kirkland & Ellis
S&C
Cravath
Debevoise
Simpson Thacher
Jones Day
Cleary Gottlieb
Davis Polk
Weil, Gotshal
10. Latham (LA)
Gibson (LA)
WLRK (Wachtell)
Shearman
Skadden (LA)
Paul Weis
Sidley (LA)
Proskauer (LA)
Paul Hastings (LA)
Cooley (SV)
20. Fenwick (SV)
Gunderson (SV)
Wilson Sonsini (SV)
MTO (LA)
Fried, Frank, Harris
Willkie
White & Case
Milbank (LA)
Ropes & Gray
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
I'm also a transfer from a T20. Does anybody know if certain firms aren't worth bidding at all if you're a transfer, or conversely, firms that are particularly favorable to transfers? I haven't gotten a very good read from OCS how I should be playing this - they say to split evenly between "highly selective" and "less selective" firms, but that's about as good as saying nothing. Shooting for NY and LA, ties to both (3 years WE in LA, family in NYC), preference is towards LA. Pre-lim bidlist forthcoming
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
I am anonymously posting my bid list. All NYC except some DC that are noted. Callsign: "Bigapplemaybe"
I am concerned the list is not conservative enough considering my grades. Wondering what people think.
Non-URM, HYP undergrad, good WE (NFP/legal) pre-LS and "why law school" narrative, EC involvement but no strong journal, 0 H (yikes). Solid but unspectacular interviewer overall. But I like interviewing.
I wasn't sure how to rank, I basically ranked based on slots available, with some exceptions. Anyone have any tips on this?
Cleary Gottlieb
Paul Weiss
Weil Gotshal
Paul Hastings
Paul Weiss DC
Goodwin Procter
Paul Hastings DC
Jones Day
Akin Gump
Baker Hostetler
Clifford Chance
Mayer Brown DC
Willkie Farr
Milbank Tweed
Covington Burling
Shearman Sterling
Hunton Williams DC
O'Melveny Myers DC
Kramer Levin
Linklaters
Kirkland Ellis
Sidley Austin
WilmerHale
White Case
Cleary Gottlieb DC
Proskauer Rose
Freshfields
Latham Watkins
Cadwalader
Davis Polk
Dechert
Allen Overy
Ropes & Gray DC
Ropes & Gray
Fried Frank
I am concerned the list is not conservative enough considering my grades. Wondering what people think.
Non-URM, HYP undergrad, good WE (NFP/legal) pre-LS and "why law school" narrative, EC involvement but no strong journal, 0 H (yikes). Solid but unspectacular interviewer overall. But I like interviewing.
I wasn't sure how to rank, I basically ranked based on slots available, with some exceptions. Anyone have any tips on this?
Cleary Gottlieb
Paul Weiss
Weil Gotshal
Paul Hastings
Paul Weiss DC
Goodwin Procter
Paul Hastings DC
Jones Day
Akin Gump
Baker Hostetler
Clifford Chance
Mayer Brown DC
Willkie Farr
Milbank Tweed
Covington Burling
Shearman Sterling
Hunton Williams DC
O'Melveny Myers DC
Kramer Levin
Linklaters
Kirkland Ellis
Sidley Austin
WilmerHale
White Case
Cleary Gottlieb DC
Proskauer Rose
Freshfields
Latham Watkins
Cadwalader
Davis Polk
Dechert
Allen Overy
Ropes & Gray DC
Ropes & Gray
Fried Frank
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
Might I ask why the whole Symplicity page must refresh in order to change the rank of a single bid? Is there a way to prevent that from happening?
If not, why, might I ask, would Symplicity wish to so grossly multiply the time we need to spend on Symplicity? (It's not like they advertise on it, or anything...)
If not, why, might I ask, would Symplicity wish to so grossly multiply the time we need to spend on Symplicity? (It's not like they advertise on it, or anything...)
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
I assume this means no LPs? This seems to have too many reaches for someone well below median. Are you set on DC?Anonymous User wrote:I am anonymously posting my bid list. All NYC except some DC that are noted. Callsign: "Bigapplemaybe"
I am concerned the list is not conservative enough considering my grades. Wondering what people think.
Non-URM, HYP undergrad, good WE (NFP/legal) pre-LS and "why law school" narrative, EC involvement but no strong journal, 0 H (yikes). Solid but unspectacular interviewer overall. But I like interviewing.
I wasn't sure how to rank, I basically ranked based on slots available, with some exceptions. Anyone have any tips on this?
Cleary Gottlieb
Paul Weiss
Weil Gotshal
Paul Hastings
Paul Weiss DC
Goodwin Procter
Paul Hastings DC
Jones Day
Akin Gump
Baker Hostetler
Clifford Chance
Mayer Brown DC
Willkie Farr
Milbank Tweed
Covington Burling
Shearman Sterling
Hunton Williams DC
O'Melveny Myers DC
Kramer Levin
Linklaters
Kirkland Ellis
Sidley Austin
WilmerHale
White Case
Cleary Gottlieb DC
Proskauer Rose
Freshfields
Latham Watkins
Cadwalader
Davis Polk
Dechert
Allen Overy
Ropes & Gray DC
Ropes & Gray
Fried Frank
- jrf12886
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:52 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
My experience is that almost all firms are happy to hire tranfers from HLS. If you look at where transfers have gone the last few years (and I believe OCS will give you that data), you'll see that they place well into even the most selective firms. I have heard from other transfers that W&C and WLRK don't often hire transfers, but that's about it.Anonymous User wrote:I'm also a transfer from a T20. Does anybody know if certain firms aren't worth bidding at all if you're a transfer, or conversely, firms that are particularly favorable to transfers? I haven't gotten a very good read from OCS how I should be playing this - they say to split evenly between "highly selective" and "less selective" firms, but that's about as good as saying nothing. Shooting for NY and LA, ties to both (3 years WE in LA, family in NYC), preference is towards LA. Pre-lim bidlist forthcoming
- jrf12886
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:52 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
From what I've seen in my transfer class, the TLS conventional wisdom that firms will treat you like they would have if you hadn't transferred doesn't hold true at EIP. They don't quite treat your 1L grades as if they were earned at HLS, but you should be bidding similar to people who are in the top third or quarter of the class. With that in mind, I think you have plenty of good targets on your list. I would say about half of the transfers my year ended up at firms on your list. Feel free to PM me with more specific questions.acrossthelake wrote:Assuming this is in order, you need to bid Fenwick, Wilson, Gunderson, and Cooley SV a lot higher in order to get a screener.Potentia wrote:Hey all. I am a transfer from a T20, top 5 in my class. I am looking to practice corporate law ideally in NY/LA (MA, cap markets, PE) but would also be interested in VC/startup transactional work (SV). I just wanted to get some feedback on my bid list, and if anyone has any experiences or advice with regards to attempting three markets (NY, LA, and SV in my case) please let me know. Thanks.
1. Kirkland & Ellis
S&C
Cravath
Debevoise
Simpson Thacher
Jones Day
Cleary Gottlieb
Davis Polk
Weil, Gotshal
10. Latham (LA)
Gibson (LA)
WLRK (Wachtell)
Shearman
Skadden (LA)
Paul Weis
Sidley (LA)
Proskauer (LA)
Paul Hastings (LA)
Cooley (SV)
20. Fenwick (SV)
Gunderson (SV)
Wilson Sonsini (SV)
MTO (LA)
Fried, Frank, Harris
Willkie
White & Case
Milbank (LA)
Ropes & Gray
Your results will be fairy similar to what you would have gotten if you hadn't transferred (a slight boost, at best). I have no idea what the odds are for any of these coming from your T20 in the top 5. Ties also matter. This list would be a bad idea for someone at HLS if they didn't have top grades, and I'm not sure top 5 at a T20 translates into being treated like top grades at HLS. I'd strongly advise talking to someone in OCS with experience with transfers; my gut is that this is too reach-heavy.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:13 pm
Re: HLS EIP 2014
Recent JD here (transfer from T20). We do *very* well. Simpson Thatcher is the only firm I encountered that really did not seem to like the transfer thing. I would estimate we're treated as though we're in the top 1/3 of the class. Most of the NY bound in my transfer group are going to top-ranked: Skadden, Cravath, S&C (don't think we had any Wachtell). LA did similarly well.Anonymous User wrote:I'm also a transfer from a T20. Does anybody know if certain firms aren't worth bidding at all if you're a transfer, or conversely, firms that are particularly favorable to transfers? I haven't gotten a very good read from OCS how I should be playing this - they say to split evenly between "highly selective" and "less selective" firms, but that's about as good as saying nothing. Shooting for NY and LA, ties to both (3 years WE in LA, family in NYC), preference is towards LA. Pre-lim bidlist forthcoming
Why we do well: transfers have reputations for being really hard-working/diligent, we're less "snobby" (actually a comment I got from an interviewer - not an accurate reflection of the HLS student body, but whatever), and we have "real" grades.
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:22 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
Fwiw, there's at least one transfer at W&C this year.jrf12886 wrote:My experience is that almost all firms are happy to hire tranfers from HLS. If you look at where transfers have gone the last few years (and I believe OCS will give you that data), you'll see that they place well into even the most selective firms. I have heard from other transfers that W&C and WLRK don't often hire transfers, but that's about it.Anonymous User wrote:I'm also a transfer from a T20. Does anybody know if certain firms aren't worth bidding at all if you're a transfer, or conversely, firms that are particularly favorable to transfers? I haven't gotten a very good read from OCS how I should be playing this - they say to split evenly between "highly selective" and "less selective" firms, but that's about as good as saying nothing. Shooting for NY and LA, ties to both (3 years WE in LA, family in NYC), preference is towards LA. Pre-lim bidlist forthcoming
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
1 DS / 9 P. Above-average softs, prestigious UG, good interview skills - Is it worth bidding anything like Kirkland, Cravath, Fenwick, or Weill?
Would love to end up at any - any help is appreciated!
Would love to end up at any - any help is appreciated!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:22 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
Kirkland and Weil NYC are certainly doable. I suspect that Cravath would be a pretty big reach but your softs/interviewing could get you there. No idea about Fenwick.Anonymous User wrote:1 DS / 9 P. Above-average softs, prestigious UG, good interview skills - Is it worth bidding anything like Kirkland, Cravath, Fenwick, or Weill?
Would love to end up at any - any help is appreciated!
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
Given 10P and "solid but unspectacular" interviewing skills, i think your concerns are well-founded and that it would be a good move to forget about DC and focus exclusively on NYC firmsAnonymous User wrote:I am anonymously posting my bid list. All NYC except some DC that are noted. Callsign: "Bigapplemaybe"
I am concerned the list is not conservative enough considering my grades. Wondering what people think.
Non-URM, HYP undergrad, good WE (NFP/legal) pre-LS and "why law school" narrative, EC involvement but no strong journal, 0 H (yikes). Solid but unspectacular interviewer overall. But I like interviewing.
I wasn't sure how to rank, I basically ranked based on slots available, with some exceptions. Anyone have any tips on this?
Cleary Gottlieb
Paul Weiss
Weil Gotshal
Paul Hastings
Paul Weiss DC
Goodwin Procter
Paul Hastings DC
Jones Day
Akin Gump
Baker Hostetler
Clifford Chance
Mayer Brown DC
Willkie Farr
Milbank Tweed
Covington Burling
Shearman Sterling
Hunton Williams DC
O'Melveny Myers DC
Kramer Levin
Linklaters
Kirkland Ellis
Sidley Austin
WilmerHale
White Case
Cleary Gottlieb DC
Proskauer Rose
Freshfields
Latham Watkins
Cadwalader
Davis Polk
Dechert
Allen Overy
Ropes & Gray DC
Ropes & Gray
Fried Frank
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
I'll also go ahead and say that it is extremely unlikely you'll get anything from DC based on the firms you chose. With straight p's, DC is still in play, but you're gonna need some brute force (interview with a lot of DC firms) and less selective firms. Right now you have neither. With only 7 or so DC screeners, and perhaps only one firm that might bite with your grades, right now I think those are wasted bids.Anonymous User wrote:I assume this means no LPs? This seems to have too many reaches for someone well below median. Are you set on DC?Anonymous User wrote:I am anonymously posting my bid list. All NYC except some DC that are noted. Callsign: "Bigapplemaybe"
I am concerned the list is not conservative enough considering my grades. Wondering what people think.
Non-URM, HYP undergrad, good WE (NFP/legal) pre-LS and "why law school" narrative, EC involvement but no strong journal, 0 H (yikes). Solid but unspectacular interviewer overall. But I like interviewing.
I wasn't sure how to rank, I basically ranked based on slots available, with some exceptions. Anyone have any tips on this?
Cleary Gottlieb
Paul Weiss
Weil Gotshal
Paul Hastings
Paul Weiss DC
Goodwin Procter
Paul Hastings DC
Jones Day
Akin Gump
Baker Hostetler
Clifford Chance
Mayer Brown DC
Willkie Farr
Milbank Tweed
Covington Burling
Shearman Sterling
Hunton Williams DC
O'Melveny Myers DC
Kramer Levin
Linklaters
Kirkland Ellis
Sidley Austin
WilmerHale
White Case
Cleary Gottlieb DC
Proskauer Rose
Freshfields
Latham Watkins
Cadwalader
Davis Polk
Dechert
Allen Overy
Ropes & Gray DC
Ropes & Gray
Fried Frank
-
- Posts: 432506
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: HLS EIP 2014
Callsign: "BosToLA" (Please don't quote)
Bid list in order (more than 35 bc of one interview/multiple bids places, marked with *):
cooley llp (LA)
Arnold & Porter (LA)
MoFo (LA)
Latham (LA)*
Gibson (LA/OC)*
Jones Day (LA/OC)
Paul Hastings (LA/OC)
Akin Gump (LA)
Gibson (LA)*
Jenner & Block (LA)
S&C (LA)
Sheppard Mullin (LA)
Sidley Austin (LA)
OMM (LA)
Proskauer (LA)
WilmerHale (LA)
Goodwin Procter (Bos)
Ropes (Bos)
OMM (Century City)
foley hoag (Bos)
OMM (OC)
WilmerHale (Bos)
Milbank (LA)
Skadden (LA)
Kirkland (LA)
K&L (LA)
Pillsbury (LA)
Simpson Thatcher (LA)
Dechert (LA/OC)
Irell (OC)
Latham (OC)*
Sheppard Mullin (OC)
Irell (Century City)
Munger (LA)
Hogan Lovell (LA)
Winston & Strawn (LA)
Sheppard Mullin (Century City)
Bid list in order (more than 35 bc of one interview/multiple bids places, marked with *):
cooley llp (LA)
Arnold & Porter (LA)
MoFo (LA)
Latham (LA)*
Gibson (LA/OC)*
Jones Day (LA/OC)
Paul Hastings (LA/OC)
Akin Gump (LA)
Gibson (LA)*
Jenner & Block (LA)
S&C (LA)
Sheppard Mullin (LA)
Sidley Austin (LA)
OMM (LA)
Proskauer (LA)
WilmerHale (LA)
Goodwin Procter (Bos)
Ropes (Bos)
OMM (Century City)
foley hoag (Bos)
OMM (OC)
WilmerHale (Bos)
Milbank (LA)
Skadden (LA)
Kirkland (LA)
K&L (LA)
Pillsbury (LA)
Simpson Thatcher (LA)
Dechert (LA/OC)
Irell (OC)
Latham (OC)*
Sheppard Mullin (OC)
Irell (Century City)
Munger (LA)
Hogan Lovell (LA)
Winston & Strawn (LA)
Sheppard Mullin (Century City)
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login