GULC EIW 2013 Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:44 am

I'm just above median and haven't heard anything back from any of the firms I interviewed with. No cbs or dings.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:44 am

Edit. Double post.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:51 am

Anonymous User wrote:I'm just above median and haven't heard anything back from any of the firms I interviewed with. No cbs or dings.
This. One of each here but silence from the 15 others. Same stats.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:54 am

Sorry for my ignorence, but how are you formulating where median is?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 11:07 am

Anonymous User wrote:Sorry for my ignorence, but how are you formulating where median is?
I don't know exactly where it is. But I believe it is supposed to be 3.33ish.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 11:09 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I'm just above median and haven't heard anything back from any of the firms I interviewed with. No cbs or dings.
This. One of each here but silence from the 15 others. Same stats.
Yeah. My fear is that I'll open my mail one day and find 10 "lol at you" letters.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 12:39 pm

If median is 3.33, I'm just below and have been dinged twice, waiting on 9 more dings.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 12:58 pm

Dings today from Skadden NY and Jones Day NY.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 3:51 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Got a CB from Sidley DC on Tuesday after a Monday interview.
Do you mind giving the interviewers' initials?
It was the IP interviewers.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:00 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Top 15%, ACLR, Moot court.

No Dings; CBs w/in 24 hrs from Steptoe, Sidley, O'Melveny, and Cooley.
Adding:
-Goodwin Procter
-Hogan
-Kirkland & Ellis
-Wiley Rein
-Jones Day

All DC, all calls
Adding Covington DC

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:04 pm

Anonymous User wrote:If median is 3.33, I'm just below and have been dinged twice, waiting on 9 more dings.
below the "alleged" median as well. 3 dings and 1 cb, so be patient. Also I've heard a different version of median which is much more reassuring and...unrealistic.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:05 pm

Ding - White & Case (DC) by email.

Callback - Paul Hastings & Locke Lord by phone.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Aug 16, 2013 5:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:09 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:If median is 3.33, I'm just below and have been dinged twice, waiting on 9 more dings.
below the "alleged" median as well. 3 dings and 1 cb, so be patient. Also I've heard a different version of median which is much more reassuring and...unrealistic.
What else would it be?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:13 pm

Question--I scheduled Covington and they asked who else I had interviews with. Anyone else get that?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:35 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Top 15%, ACLR, Moot court.

No Dings; CBs w/in 24 hrs from Steptoe, Sidley, O'Melveny, and Cooley.
Adding:
-Goodwin Procter
-Hogan
-Kirkland & Ellis
-Wiley Rein
-Jones Day

All DC, all calls
Adding Covington DC
Hot damn anon! Leave some for the rest of us, eh!? :)
If you're being truthful (I have no reason to believe otherwise) congratulations are in order. Good luck with your callbacks.

Now that EIW is over would you mind sharing your secret? That is if you've got one other than very impressive stats.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:49 pm

Here's all my current info:

Stats: Top 10%, Main Journal

Callbacks so far:
Covington DC
Mofo DC
Latham DC
Jones Day DC
Skadden NY
Bingham NY
Schulte NY
Sheppard NY

Rejections so far:
Patton Boggs DC
Debevoise NY

Haven't heard anything from:
Sidley DC
Gibson Dunn DC
Williams & Connolly DC
Paul, Weiss DC
Paul, Weiss NY
Davis Polk NY
Shearman NY
Willkie NY
Ropes NY
Simpson Thacher NY

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:46 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Question--I scheduled Covington and they asked who else I had interviews with. Anyone else get that?
They asked me, too.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:13 pm

Ropes & Gray NY CB

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:15 pm

What are your collective CB schedules looking like? Anyone heard anything from Chicago or LA??

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:22 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Ropes & Gray NY CB
Please post interviewer's initials.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:26 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Here's all my current info:

Stats: Top 10%, Main Journal

Callbacks so far:
Covington DC
Mofo DC
Latham DC
Jones Day DC
Skadden NY
Bingham NY
Schulte NY
Sheppard NY

Rejections so far:
Patton Boggs DC
Debevoise NY

Haven't heard anything from:
Sidley DC
Gibson Dunn DC
Williams & Connolly DC
Paul, Weiss DC
Paul, Weiss NY
Davis Polk NY
Shearman NY
Willkie NY
Ropes NY
Simpson Thacher NY
Who was your Shearman interviewer (initials)? I felt like my interview went really well as did the reception, yet nada from them.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:28 pm

Anonymous User wrote: Who was your Shearman interviewer (initials)? I felt like my interview went really well as did the reception, yet nada from them.
EM. Yours?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:41 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: Who was your Shearman interviewer (initials)? I felt like my interview went really well as did the reception, yet nada from them.
EM. Yours?
Same. Very interesting...wondering if it's just that particular interviewer because I (thought) met the credentials and (thought) we really clicked.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:42 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: Who was your Shearman interviewer (initials)? I felt like my interview went really well as did the reception, yet nada from them.
EM. Yours?
Same. Very interesting...wondering if it's just that particular interviewer because I (thought) met the credentials and (thought) we really clicked.
Also on main journal, though not in top 10%

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC EIW 2013

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:43 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: Who was your Shearman interviewer (initials)? I felt like my interview went really well as did the reception, yet nada from them.
EM. Yours?
Same. Very interesting...wondering if it's just that particular interviewer because I (thought) met the credentials and (thought) we really clicked.
Sounds like she might not have returned her evaluation forms yet. Anyone else interview with EM at Shearman and hear back already?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”