Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:44 pm

Well, I’ve just submitted a Vault response where Milbank is the most prestigious firm in the country, followed by middling scores for each firm that has matched so far. And every firm that hasn’t matched gets a 1.

Fighting the good fight.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:45 pm

Screw this. I’m updating my resume and will be applying to milbank, cadwaladar, mcdermott, fried frank, goodwin, baker, wilmer, DLA, Winston, NRF and Cooley.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:45 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:42 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:24 pm
I think DPW has its own plan and is telling Milbank/the market in general that it follows no one. There will be raises and special bonuses forthcoming, and DPW will be the talk of the town. They just don't feel the need to go tit for tat with Milbank when they have a plan in place that exceeds current market.
Agree with the bolded -- part of the silence is DPW ostentatiously not giving a shit about Milbank (which is somewhat surprising but maybe that's the point). The rest of this post is ...optimistic.
I love Milbank for pushing comp up and prestige is meaningless, but really don’t see Milbank breaking into DPW’s tier. The firm just doesn’t have enough partner talent across the board to be seen as or become a true peer of DPW, from DPW’s sightline.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:48 pm

Looks like the Gunderson match (and raise for 2013s) is ATL official: https://abovethelaw.com/2022/02/gunderson-raise-2022/

It's not much but nice to see some movement.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:52 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:45 pm
I love Milbank for pushing comp up and prestige is meaningless, but really don’t see Milbank breaking into DPW’s tier. The firm just doesn’t have enough partner talent across the board to be seen as or become a true peer of DPW, from DPW’s sightline.
"partner talent" fucking lol. That's the last thing impacting my vault vote.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:01 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:52 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:45 pm
I love Milbank for pushing comp up and prestige is meaningless, but really don’t see Milbank breaking into DPW’s tier. The firm just doesn’t have enough partner talent across the board to be seen as or become a true peer of DPW, from DPW’s sightline.
"partner talent" fucking lol. That's the last thing impacting my vault vote.
My point is even Milbank to #1 on Vault this year still isn’t going to get us paid by papa DPW because Milbank isn’t ELITE in their eyes

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:04 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:31 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:24 pm
I think DPW has its own plan and is telling Milbank/the market in general that it follows no one. There will be raises and special bonuses forthcoming, and DPW will be the talk of the town. They just don't feel the need to go tit for tat with Milbank when they have a plan in place that exceeds current market.
Makes no sense to me. If the plan here is to stunt on Milbank, they're doing a poor job. I'm a DPW associate and am feeling pretty stunted on atm.

Sure, blowing Milbank out of the water in a few weeks would be nice, but will it fully unscramble the eggs that are my morale right now? Probably not, especially given the tone-deaf RTO plan announced amidst the comp silence.
I mean... at least for me, as much as I hate all this waiting, a re-raise plus a true-up would more than make up for it. I'd be happy to forgive and forget this month+ in limbo if it ended in another 10k a year.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:06 pm

How much do we think Staci Zaretsky gets paid? Whatever the answer, it's too much.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:10 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:06 pm
How much do we think Staci Zaretsky gets paid? Whatever the answer, it's too much.
Meh not a fan but let’s not shit on individuals, especially when they probably read this. And I know I sound like Staci’s mom writing this

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:16 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:10 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:06 pm
How much do we think Staci Zaretsky gets paid? Whatever the answer, it's too much.
Meh not a fan but let’s not shit on individuals, especially when they probably read this. And I know I sound like Staci’s mom writing this
Oh give me a break. The name could be replaced with any ABL writer and you knew that. No one has anything against Staci in particular.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pm

Would another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.

side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:22 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:45 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:42 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:24 pm
I think DPW has its own plan and is telling Milbank/the market in general that it follows no one. There will be raises and special bonuses forthcoming, and DPW will be the talk of the town. They just don't feel the need to go tit for tat with Milbank when they have a plan in place that exceeds current market.
Agree with the bolded -- part of the silence is DPW ostentatiously not giving a shit about Milbank (which is somewhat surprising but maybe that's the point). The rest of this post is ...optimistic.
I love Milbank for pushing comp up and prestige is meaningless, but really don’t see Milbank breaking into DPW’s tier. The firm just doesn’t have enough partner talent across the board to be seen as or become a true peer of DPW, from DPW’s sightline.
20 years ago, no one thought that Latham and Kirkland would break into DPW tier. I know many people here would claim they're still not, but that's mostly prestige whoring - everyone knows the work at both those shops are comparable to the work at DPW.

Milbank isn't just splashing money on associates - they've had some incredible lateral partner hiring from places like Cravath and Wachtell. Their PPP are already on the same tier as DPW/Cravath etc. and that's what helps attract lateral partners the most. I think they're on a very, very good trajectory to be DPW's peer in 10 years. Honestly, right now, it seems like going to Milbank is a good idea from an investment perspective. Buy low (I think the market perception on Milbank is lower than it should be), sell high (leave or try and make partner while it's still growing).

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:26 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pm
Would another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.

side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
I think it's safe to say that Milbank will be v20 come next vault ranking. and it will see a resulting impact on recruiting (more t6 recruits for example).
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:27 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:22 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:45 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:42 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:24 pm
I think DPW has its own plan and is telling Milbank/the market in general that it follows no one. There will be raises and special bonuses forthcoming, and DPW will be the talk of the town. They just don't feel the need to go tit for tat with Milbank when they have a plan in place that exceeds current market.
Agree with the bolded -- part of the silence is DPW ostentatiously not giving a shit about Milbank (which is somewhat surprising but maybe that's the point). The rest of this post is ...optimistic.
I love Milbank for pushing comp up and prestige is meaningless, but really don’t see Milbank breaking into DPW’s tier. The firm just doesn’t have enough partner talent across the board to be seen as or become a true peer of DPW, from DPW’s sightline.
20 years ago, no one thought that Latham and Kirkland would break into DPW tier. I know many people here would claim they're still not, but that's mostly prestige whoring - everyone knows the work at both those shops are comparable to the work at DPW.

Milbank isn't just splashing money on associates - they've had some incredible lateral partner hiring from places like Cravath and Wachtell. Their PPP are already on the same tier as DPW/Cravath etc. and that's what helps attract lateral partners the most. I think they're on a very, very good trajectory to be DPW's peer in 10 years. Honestly, right now, it seems like going to Milbank is a good idea from an investment perspective. Buy low (I think the market perception on Milbank is lower than it should be), sell high (leave or try and make partner while it's still growing).
You make good points. They do have the cash to try to pull a Kirkland/Latham and will be fairly successful if they only get halfway there. I guess I just doubt that firms will be as successful buying up PE, debt finance, tax and exec comp talent now versus starting 5-10 years ago. Price is up and the V10 know to play defense now.

NoLongerALurker

Bronze
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 2:08 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by NoLongerALurker » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:48 pm

I can’t actually rationalize or justify it, but am I the only one that finds it super cringey when people refer to associates and partners as “talent”?

bigboybob

New
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2021 12:46 pm

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by bigboybob » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:53 pm

Honestly, I'm starting to give up hope that the Milbank scale, or anything greater, will be market.

I wonder if this is what Neil wants?

Hes probably sitting up in his high rise NYC apartment cracking up a few lobster claws and dipping them in a mixture of butter and shredded hundred dollar bills...reading this tread and laughing at us all.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:58 pm

You guys lionize Neil because DPW raised base pay one time :roll:.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:59 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:20 am
My partner told me today is the day!
You are beyond rude

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:12 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:26 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pm
Would another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.

side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
I think it's safe to say that Milbank will be v20 come next vault ranking. and it will see a resulting impact on recruiting (more t6 recruits for example).
Milbank was already fairly selective at my t6 before the raises. A lot of qualified students didn't get callbacks.

User avatar
nahumya

Bronze
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:49 pm

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by nahumya » Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:15 pm

NoLongerALurker wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:48 pm
I can’t actually rationalize or justify it, but am I the only one that finds it super cringey when people refer to associates and partners as “talent”?
What term can be used instead? I thought "talent" is pretty standard in recruit-speak across all industries.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:17 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:26 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pm
Would another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.

side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
I think it's safe to say that Milbank will be v20 come next vault ranking. and it will see a resulting impact on recruiting (more t6 recruits for example).
Milbank was already fairly selective at my t6 before the raises. A lot of qualified students didn't get callbacks.
.

Really? They weren't incredibly selective from Penn.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:34 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:48 pm
Looks like the Gunderson match (and raise for 2013s) is ATL official: https://abovethelaw.com/2022/02/gunderson-raise-2022/

It's not much but nice to see some movement.

Damn, associates in Ann Arbor are sitting pretty.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:37 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:26 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pm
Would another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.

side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
I think it's safe to say that Milbank will be v20 come next vault ranking. and it will see a resulting impact on recruiting (more t6 recruits for example).
Milbank was already fairly selective at my t6 before the raises. A lot of qualified students didn't get callbacks.
They took median or slightly above median candidates from my T6. A few people with strong GPAs ended up going to Milbank as well (by choice). No shade at all but some of my quirkier or more off-center/eccentric classmates ended up at Milbank.

NoLongerALurker

Bronze
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 2:08 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by NoLongerALurker » Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:39 pm

nahumya wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:15 pm
NoLongerALurker wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:48 pm
I can’t actually rationalize or justify it, but am I the only one that finds it super cringey when people refer to associates and partners as “talent”?
What term can be used instead? I thought "talent" is pretty standard in recruit-speak across all industries.
Yeah, I hear ya. For whatever reason I feel like it only works in the sports and entertainment industries, and in all other cases feels kinda cringe. But especially in law or other paper-pushing industries (like, I’d maybe balk for a second at calling a scientist talented, but I wouldn’t cringe at it the way I do for lawyers or accountants). Maybe I’m self-hating.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:44 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:37 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:26 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pm
Would another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.

side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
I think it's safe to say that Milbank will be v20 come next vault ranking. and it will see a resulting impact on recruiting (more t6 recruits for example).
Milbank was already fairly selective at my t6 before the raises. A lot of qualified students didn't get callbacks.
They took median or slightly above median candidates from my T6. A few people with strong GPAs ended up going to Milbank as well (by choice). No shade at all but some of my quirkier or more off-center/eccentric classmates ended up at Milbank.
this is the most attractive thing I've heard about milbank -- assuming you aren't just using quirky as a euphemism for aspie, law students and lawyers could generally use a little more quirk

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”