Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Well, I’ve just submitted a Vault response where Milbank is the most prestigious firm in the country, followed by middling scores for each firm that has matched so far. And every firm that hasn’t matched gets a 1.
Fighting the good fight.
Fighting the good fight.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Screw this. I’m updating my resume and will be applying to milbank, cadwaladar, mcdermott, fried frank, goodwin, baker, wilmer, DLA, Winston, NRF and Cooley.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
I love Milbank for pushing comp up and prestige is meaningless, but really don’t see Milbank breaking into DPW’s tier. The firm just doesn’t have enough partner talent across the board to be seen as or become a true peer of DPW, from DPW’s sightline.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:42 pmAgree with the bolded -- part of the silence is DPW ostentatiously not giving a shit about Milbank (which is somewhat surprising but maybe that's the point). The rest of this post is ...optimistic.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:24 pmI think DPW has its own plan and is telling Milbank/the market in general that it follows no one. There will be raises and special bonuses forthcoming, and DPW will be the talk of the town. They just don't feel the need to go tit for tat with Milbank when they have a plan in place that exceeds current market.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Looks like the Gunderson match (and raise for 2013s) is ATL official: https://abovethelaw.com/2022/02/gunderson-raise-2022/
It's not much but nice to see some movement.
It's not much but nice to see some movement.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
"partner talent" fucking lol. That's the last thing impacting my vault vote.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:45 pmI love Milbank for pushing comp up and prestige is meaningless, but really don’t see Milbank breaking into DPW’s tier. The firm just doesn’t have enough partner talent across the board to be seen as or become a true peer of DPW, from DPW’s sightline.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
My point is even Milbank to #1 on Vault this year still isn’t going to get us paid by papa DPW because Milbank isn’t ELITE in their eyesAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:52 pm"partner talent" fucking lol. That's the last thing impacting my vault vote.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:45 pmI love Milbank for pushing comp up and prestige is meaningless, but really don’t see Milbank breaking into DPW’s tier. The firm just doesn’t have enough partner talent across the board to be seen as or become a true peer of DPW, from DPW’s sightline.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
I mean... at least for me, as much as I hate all this waiting, a re-raise plus a true-up would more than make up for it. I'd be happy to forgive and forget this month+ in limbo if it ended in another 10k a year.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:31 pmMakes no sense to me. If the plan here is to stunt on Milbank, they're doing a poor job. I'm a DPW associate and am feeling pretty stunted on atm.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:24 pmI think DPW has its own plan and is telling Milbank/the market in general that it follows no one. There will be raises and special bonuses forthcoming, and DPW will be the talk of the town. They just don't feel the need to go tit for tat with Milbank when they have a plan in place that exceeds current market.
Sure, blowing Milbank out of the water in a few weeks would be nice, but will it fully unscramble the eggs that are my morale right now? Probably not, especially given the tone-deaf RTO plan announced amidst the comp silence.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
How much do we think Staci Zaretsky gets paid? Whatever the answer, it's too much.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Meh not a fan but let’s not shit on individuals, especially when they probably read this. And I know I sound like Staci’s mom writing thisAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:06 pmHow much do we think Staci Zaretsky gets paid? Whatever the answer, it's too much.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Oh give me a break. The name could be replaced with any ABL writer and you knew that. No one has anything against Staci in particular.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:10 pmMeh not a fan but let’s not shit on individuals, especially when they probably read this. And I know I sound like Staci’s mom writing thisAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:06 pmHow much do we think Staci Zaretsky gets paid? Whatever the answer, it's too much.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Would another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.
side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
20 years ago, no one thought that Latham and Kirkland would break into DPW tier. I know many people here would claim they're still not, but that's mostly prestige whoring - everyone knows the work at both those shops are comparable to the work at DPW.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:45 pmI love Milbank for pushing comp up and prestige is meaningless, but really don’t see Milbank breaking into DPW’s tier. The firm just doesn’t have enough partner talent across the board to be seen as or become a true peer of DPW, from DPW’s sightline.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:42 pmAgree with the bolded -- part of the silence is DPW ostentatiously not giving a shit about Milbank (which is somewhat surprising but maybe that's the point). The rest of this post is ...optimistic.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:24 pmI think DPW has its own plan and is telling Milbank/the market in general that it follows no one. There will be raises and special bonuses forthcoming, and DPW will be the talk of the town. They just don't feel the need to go tit for tat with Milbank when they have a plan in place that exceeds current market.
Milbank isn't just splashing money on associates - they've had some incredible lateral partner hiring from places like Cravath and Wachtell. Their PPP are already on the same tier as DPW/Cravath etc. and that's what helps attract lateral partners the most. I think they're on a very, very good trajectory to be DPW's peer in 10 years. Honestly, right now, it seems like going to Milbank is a good idea from an investment perspective. Buy low (I think the market perception on Milbank is lower than it should be), sell high (leave or try and make partner while it's still growing).
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
I think it's safe to say that Milbank will be v20 come next vault ranking. and it will see a resulting impact on recruiting (more t6 recruits for example).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pmWould another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.
side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
You make good points. They do have the cash to try to pull a Kirkland/Latham and will be fairly successful if they only get halfway there. I guess I just doubt that firms will be as successful buying up PE, debt finance, tax and exec comp talent now versus starting 5-10 years ago. Price is up and the V10 know to play defense now.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:22 pm20 years ago, no one thought that Latham and Kirkland would break into DPW tier. I know many people here would claim they're still not, but that's mostly prestige whoring - everyone knows the work at both those shops are comparable to the work at DPW.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:45 pmI love Milbank for pushing comp up and prestige is meaningless, but really don’t see Milbank breaking into DPW’s tier. The firm just doesn’t have enough partner talent across the board to be seen as or become a true peer of DPW, from DPW’s sightline.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:42 pmAgree with the bolded -- part of the silence is DPW ostentatiously not giving a shit about Milbank (which is somewhat surprising but maybe that's the point). The rest of this post is ...optimistic.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:24 pmI think DPW has its own plan and is telling Milbank/the market in general that it follows no one. There will be raises and special bonuses forthcoming, and DPW will be the talk of the town. They just don't feel the need to go tit for tat with Milbank when they have a plan in place that exceeds current market.
Milbank isn't just splashing money on associates - they've had some incredible lateral partner hiring from places like Cravath and Wachtell. Their PPP are already on the same tier as DPW/Cravath etc. and that's what helps attract lateral partners the most. I think they're on a very, very good trajectory to be DPW's peer in 10 years. Honestly, right now, it seems like going to Milbank is a good idea from an investment perspective. Buy low (I think the market perception on Milbank is lower than it should be), sell high (leave or try and make partner while it's still growing).
-
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 2:08 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
I can’t actually rationalize or justify it, but am I the only one that finds it super cringey when people refer to associates and partners as “talent”?
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2021 12:46 pm
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Honestly, I'm starting to give up hope that the Milbank scale, or anything greater, will be market.
I wonder if this is what Neil wants?
Hes probably sitting up in his high rise NYC apartment cracking up a few lobster claws and dipping them in a mixture of butter and shredded hundred dollar bills...reading this tread and laughing at us all.
I wonder if this is what Neil wants?
Hes probably sitting up in his high rise NYC apartment cracking up a few lobster claws and dipping them in a mixture of butter and shredded hundred dollar bills...reading this tread and laughing at us all.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
You guys lionize Neil because DPW raised base pay one time
.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
You are beyond rude
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Milbank was already fairly selective at my t6 before the raises. A lot of qualified students didn't get callbacks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:26 pmI think it's safe to say that Milbank will be v20 come next vault ranking. and it will see a resulting impact on recruiting (more t6 recruits for example).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pmWould another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.
side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
- nahumya
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:49 pm
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
What term can be used instead? I thought "talent" is pretty standard in recruit-speak across all industries.NoLongerALurker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:48 pmI can’t actually rationalize or justify it, but am I the only one that finds it super cringey when people refer to associates and partners as “talent”?
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:12 pmMilbank was already fairly selective at my t6 before the raises. A lot of qualified students didn't get callbacks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:26 pmI think it's safe to say that Milbank will be v20 come next vault ranking. and it will see a resulting impact on recruiting (more t6 recruits for example).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pmWould another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.
side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
Really? They weren't incredibly selective from Penn.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 12:48 pmLooks like the Gunderson match (and raise for 2013s) is ATL official: https://abovethelaw.com/2022/02/gunderson-raise-2022/
It's not much but nice to see some movement.
Damn, associates in Ann Arbor are sitting pretty.
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
They took median or slightly above median candidates from my T6. A few people with strong GPAs ended up going to Milbank as well (by choice). No shade at all but some of my quirkier or more off-center/eccentric classmates ended up at Milbank.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:12 pmMilbank was already fairly selective at my t6 before the raises. A lot of qualified students didn't get callbacks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:26 pmI think it's safe to say that Milbank will be v20 come next vault ranking. and it will see a resulting impact on recruiting (more t6 recruits for example).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pmWould another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.
side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
-
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 2:08 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Yeah, I hear ya. For whatever reason I feel like it only works in the sports and entertainment industries, and in all other cases feels kinda cringe. But especially in law or other paper-pushing industries (like, I’d maybe balk for a second at calling a scientist talented, but I wouldn’t cringe at it the way I do for lawyers or accountants). Maybe I’m self-hating.nahumya wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:15 pmWhat term can be used instead? I thought "talent" is pretty standard in recruit-speak across all industries.NoLongerALurker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:48 pmI can’t actually rationalize or justify it, but am I the only one that finds it super cringey when people refer to associates and partners as “talent”?
-
- Posts: 432621
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
this is the most attractive thing I've heard about milbank -- assuming you aren't just using quirky as a euphemism for aspie, law students and lawyers could generally use a little more quirkAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:37 pmThey took median or slightly above median candidates from my T6. A few people with strong GPAs ended up going to Milbank as well (by choice). No shade at all but some of my quirkier or more off-center/eccentric classmates ended up at Milbank.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:12 pmMilbank was already fairly selective at my t6 before the raises. A lot of qualified students didn't get callbacks.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:26 pmI think it's safe to say that Milbank will be v20 come next vault ranking. and it will see a resulting impact on recruiting (more t6 recruits for example).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:18 pmWould another V20 match move V10 to raise or simply match quicker? I know WH has matched but seems like that's the only V20.
side note: Milbank deserves to be V20 at the very least
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login