Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Gunderson matched.
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
We're prob not getting a re-raise because a ton of you apparently have no work
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
So anybody have any fun ways to celebrate the 4-week mark of no-raises tomorrow? 
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
So Gunderson, Cooley and Goodwin have matched. What are Fenwick and Wilson waiting for?
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 7:53 pmWe're prob not getting a re-raise because a ton of you apparently have no work
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2019 12:34 pm
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
This doesn't make a lot of sense.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:59 pmAlright look I got an A- in law firm finance seminar at YHSCCN so I can tell you exactly what's happening. (lol)
(but seriously) Think like a managing partner for a second. If v10 matches now, then v10 will be expected to pay increased salary all year and at least one mid year special bonus. If they all collectively agree to ignore this, DPW can SHATTER the millybank scale effective April 1 or July 1, with a 3 or 6 month true up disguised as a pretty fat "special bonus" (like 2018 or whatever year that happened). And the market will follow. Final result: DPW maintains its spot as top comp dog and they nip the firehose of *actual* special bonuses. Remember, firms DO NOT want to pay us these bonuses for the rest of forever. The gravy train has to end eventually.
The one big risk is whether all firms play ball (kind of a millionaire prisoner's dilemma). A cascading match would force DPW to abandon this plan and match/raise early. Debatably this has already started with Cooley but we'll see.
And take note that no recruiting season exists between now and April/July so there is not a real risk of recruiting issues until late summer/early fall. If peer firms are playing along, then your top talent will stay. They won't leave for a temporary pay increase.
First of all, no chance DPW would get away with waiting until April to match the new scale and just calling their true up payment a special bonus. Morgan Lewis has already been criticized for trying this (which I don't think was their intent) in this current cycle.
Second, that true up payment would be like $5-10k for midlevels. That's nowhere near the special bonus level that midlevels are seniors are hoping for with a special bonus announcement (and definitely not "fat"). Think more in the range of $50-75k based on last year's scale plus inflation (not saying we'll get that, just that a $5k bonus would be a major let down in most people's eyes).
Third, there is nothing to suggest that if DPW doesn't announce a match until late spring/early summer that there's no recruiting season. The big special bonuses are targeting keeping midlevels and seniors. Those people are being recruited every day, and if another month goes by without a match from the v10, it may not be droves, but it also won't be zero associates that leave their v10 shops for higher paying firms like DLA, Goodwin, Cooley and Fried Frank. V10 associates already go to these firms as midlevels looking for a better lifestyle (which, lol).
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
When did this happen? Trying to figure out if evening announcements are a thing or if the news is just hitting TLS late.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2021 12:46 pm
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Did Gunderson offer a true up payment?
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Made me curious why their website is gunder.com. Amazingly the answer is that gunderson.com was already taken by a jewelry store.
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Can people stop suggesting that a true-up will be regarded as a special bonus? I get that a lot of attorneys weren't exactly math majors in undergrad but no one is stupid or gullible enough to think that a cumulative true-up payment is equivalent to a bonus. "Hey, sorry we paid you less than your peers at DLA for three months, but here's a catch-up to your sub-market pay" is not in the same realm as announcing special bonuses. You can see such weird ideas floated here sometimes.
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Also, I hate stupid comments like these. It takes a few minutes to read through the shitpoasting here and another few minutes to type a few replies. I guarantee you every person complaining about this has spent more time checking sports scores or looking at their insta feed.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 7:53 pmWe're prob not getting a re-raise because a ton of you apparently have no work
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
As someone who got an A in a similar seminar at YHSCCNMVPBDNC, I think you are spot on.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:59 pmAlright look I got an A- in law firm finance seminar at YHSCCN so I can tell you exactly what's happening. (lol)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
As someone who was almost median at a very solid member of YHSCCNMVPBDNCG, I tend to disagree and also objectively think DC >>>>NYCAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:19 pmAs someone who got an A in a similar seminar at YHSCCNMVPBDNC, I think you are spot on.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:59 pmAlright look I got an A- in law firm finance seminar at YHSCCN so I can tell you exactly what's happening. (lol)
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Hoya saxa, mf-ers.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:25 pmAs someone who was almost median at a very solid member of YHSCCNMVPBDNCG, I tend to disagree and also objectively think DC >>>>NYCAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:19 pmAs someone who got an A in a similar seminar at YHSCCNMVPBDNC, I think you are spot on.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:59 pmAlright look I got an A- in law firm finance seminar at YHSCCN so I can tell you exactly what's happening. (lol)
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Fixed, no one is letting "T15" slide guys...it's overAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:33 pmHoya saxa, mf-ers.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:25 pmAs someone who was almost median at a very solid member of YHSCCNMVPBDNCU, I tend to disagree and also objectively think DC >>>>NYCAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:19 pmAs someone who got an A in a similar seminar at YHSCCNMVPBDNC, I think you are spot on.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:59 pmAlright look I got an A- in law firm finance seminar at YHSCCN so I can tell you exactly what's happening. (lol)
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
You could take this thread, compile it, add a few footnotes with psych text citations, and do your dissertation on "An Instance of Electronic Collective Mass Psychosis Amongst a White-Collar Professional Cohort."
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
The grinders are the problem with this profession. It's a good skill at the junior level. At the senior level they just burn their subordinates out with mindless busy work and going down rabbit holes. The more useful grind-esque skill, I think, is the ability to manage projects and move things along.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:08 pmI feel like it’s not uncommon to be fairly smart, but being a true grinder is an valuable gift and skill that’s being discounted here.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Six Degrees of Kevin LobsterAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 12:37 pmThere's gotta be someone familiar enough with the legal market to game out how this could trickle up from Cooley to DPW. As in, Cooley is a peer of A in X market, so A will need to match. Then A is a peer of B in Y market, so B will match. Then B is a peer of [insert V5], so that V5 will need to match, which will finally put gears in motion for the rest of us.
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Can’t wait for another day to be paid under market.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
West Coast firms have to match at this point
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Associates should utilize what's their power and the tool available to them (Vault ranking survey) to make it known to the partners. Just rank all the non-matched firms low and see if they'd match quickly the next time around.
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
My partner told me today is the day!
-
- Posts: 432625
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K
Big brain anon here. Firms did this a couple years ago, so I don't think it's out of the question. For Juniors it was equivalent to a true up payment but for midlevels (maybe) and seniors it was higher (maybe 2x true up?). Not equivalent to the fat bonuses but remember, the law firms have the incentive to wean us off the special bonus teat.TigerIsBack wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 8:21 pmThis doesn't make a lot of sense.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:59 pmAlright look I got an A- in law firm finance seminar at YHSCCN so I can tell you exactly what's happening. (lol)
(but seriously) Think like a managing partner for a second. If v10 matches now, then v10 will be expected to pay increased salary all year and at least one mid year special bonus. If they all collectively agree to ignore this, DPW can SHATTER the millybank scale effective April 1 or July 1, with a 3 or 6 month true up disguised as a pretty fat "special bonus" (like 2018 or whatever year that happened). And the market will follow. Final result: DPW maintains its spot as top comp dog and they nip the firehose of *actual* special bonuses. Remember, firms DO NOT want to pay us these bonuses for the rest of forever. The gravy train has to end eventually.
The one big risk is whether all firms play ball (kind of a millionaire prisoner's dilemma). A cascading match would force DPW to abandon this plan and match/raise early. Debatably this has already started with Cooley but we'll see.
And take note that no recruiting season exists between now and April/July so there is not a real risk of recruiting issues until late summer/early fall. If peer firms are playing along, then your top talent will stay. They won't leave for a temporary pay increase.
First of all, no chance DPW would get away with waiting until April to match the new scale and just calling their true up payment a special bonus. Morgan Lewis has already been criticized for trying this (which I don't think was their intent) in this current cycle.
Second, that true up payment would be like $5-10k for midlevels. That's nowhere near the special bonus level that midlevels are seniors are hoping for with a special bonus announcement (and definitely not "fat"). Think more in the range of $50-75k based on last year's scale plus inflation (not saying we'll get that, just that a $5k bonus would be a major let down in most people's eyes).
Third, there is nothing to suggest that if DPW doesn't announce a match until late spring/early summer that there's no recruiting season. The big special bonuses are targeting keeping midlevels and seniors. Those people are being recruited every day, and if another month goes by without a match from the v10, it may not be droves, but it also won't be zero associates that leave their v10 shops for higher paying firms like DLA, Goodwin, Cooley and Fried Frank. V10 associates already go to these firms as midlevels looking for a better lifestyle (which, lol).
And of course the firm could put a little on top if they wanted to. The point is that a true up has historically been called a special bonus and there is incentive to do that again (even in part).
And hmm, I know it goes against TLS dogma but as a pretentious YHSCCNer myself (with the student loans to show for it) I REALLY don't think the type of midlevel/senior considering v10 preftige would choose one of those "non-peer" firms based on a (presumably) temporary <6.5% salary boost, before taxes. Especially when v10 firms are throwing around fat black box signing bonuses these days.
Agree to disagree but saying this "doesn't make sense" is kind of silly when we're all literally watching DPW not match or re-raise for what seems to be no reason.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login