NYC to 200k Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:31 pm

I'm surprised none of Simpson's peers matched shortly after it did. There is no question the other V10 firms will at least match the Milbank raise. They will probably also match the Simpson bonus. So what are they waiting for? Associate excitement is starting to turn a bit into grumbling in my office, particularly because firms matched so quickly last time and because lower ranked, less profitable firms have already matched this time.

User avatar
Clearly

Gold
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Clearly » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:33 pm

Anonymous User wrote:I'm surprised none of Simpson's peers matched shortly after it did. There is no question the other V10 firms will at least match the Milbank raise. They will probably also match the Simpson bonus. So what are they waiting for? Associate excitement is starting to turn a bit into grumbling in my office, particularly because firms matched so quickly last time and because lower ranked, less profitable firms have already matched this time.
It's pretty obvious CSM is going to 200 and they don't want to play catch up with 2 announcements. Once csm moves, everyone else will too.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:35 pm

Clearly wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I'm surprised none of Simpson's peers matched shortly after it did. There is no question the other V10 firms will at least match the Milbank raise. They will probably also match the Simpson bonus. So what are they waiting for? Associate excitement is starting to turn a bit into grumbling in my office, particularly because firms matched so quickly last time and because lower ranked, less profitable firms have already matched this time.
It's pretty obvious CSM is going to 200 and they don't want to play catch up with 2 announcements. Once csm moves, everyone else will too.
BOUT FUCKIN TIME SOMEONE SAID THIS. Enough of these sad sacks talkin about "firm finances" and their deep analyses.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:39 pm

Clearly wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I'm surprised none of Simpson's peers matched shortly after it did. There is no question the other V10 firms will at least match the Milbank raise. They will probably also match the Simpson bonus. So what are they waiting for? Associate excitement is starting to turn a bit into grumbling in my office, particularly because firms matched so quickly last time and because lower ranked, less profitable firms have already matched this time.
It's pretty obvious CSM is going to 200 and they don't want to play catch up with 2 announcements. Once csm moves, everyone else will too.
So you're saying they'll wait even more?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:40 pm

Clearly wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I'm surprised none of Simpson's peers matched shortly after it did. There is no question the other V10 firms will at least match the Milbank raise. They will probably also match the Simpson bonus. So what are they waiting for? Associate excitement is starting to turn a bit into grumbling in my office, particularly because firms matched so quickly last time and because lower ranked, less profitable firms have already matched this time.
It's pretty obvious CSM is going to 200 and they don't want to play catch up with 2 announcements. Once csm moves, everyone else will too.
So why doesn't Kirkland or Davis Polk or Skadden come in and scoop them, if we're going to 200 anyway? They all have the revenue and profits to do so. And doing so would be a boon to their associate morale, their associate retention, their lateral recruiting, and their OCI hiring.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:42 pm

Image

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:52 pm

It's starting to feel like there will not be anymore raises.

Does anyone have any good info? Please convince me that I'm wrong.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:54 pm

Forgot salary raises were occurring, come to check for news expecting a bonfire, instead I find a dumpster fire.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:55 pm

Anonymous User wrote: Please convince me that I'm wrong.
Proskauer, Winston Strawn, Milbank & Simpson all currently pay their associates more than Cravath, Kirkland, Latham, DPW, Cleary & Skadden

What else do you need to know?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:56 pm

Anonymous User wrote:It's starting to feel like there will not be anymore raises.

Does anyone have any good info? Please convince me that I'm wrong.
It'd be shocking to say the least if no other firms matched at least $190k. Can you imagine the amount of OCI bids for Milbank, Proskauer, Jones Day, and Winston if they were the only major Vault firms to be at $190k?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:57 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: Please convince me that I'm wrong.
Proskauer, Winston Strawn, Milbank & Simpson all currently pay their associates more than Cravath, Kirkland, Latham, DPW, Cleary & Skadden

What else do you need to know?
I just don't understand what's taking so long.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:58 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: Please convince me that I'm wrong.
Proskauer, Winston Strawn, Milbank & Simpson all currently pay their associates more than Cravath, Kirkland, Latham, DPW, Cleary & Skadden

What else do you need to know?
I just don't understand what's taking so long.
Greed. Plain and simple. Partners dont wanna pay associates a dime more than they need to.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:58 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:It's starting to feel like there will not be anymore raises.

Does anyone have any good info? Please convince me that I'm wrong.
It'd be shocking to say the least if no other firms matched at least $190k. Can you imagine the amount of OCI bids for Milbank, Proskauer, Jones Day, and Winston if they were the only major Vault firms to be at $190k?
Explanation: They all thought Cravath would go to 200 and prematurely went to 190 when in reality Cravath had no intention of raising salaries. Once they realize Cravath isn't doing 190, they'll all go back to 180.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:58 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Clearly wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I'm surprised none of Simpson's peers matched shortly after it did. There is no question the other V10 firms will at least match the Milbank raise. They will probably also match the Simpson bonus. So what are they waiting for? Associate excitement is starting to turn a bit into grumbling in my office, particularly because firms matched so quickly last time and because lower ranked, less profitable firms have already matched this time.
It's pretty obvious CSM is going to 200 and they don't want to play catch up with 2 announcements. Once csm moves, everyone else will too.
So why doesn't Kirkland or Davis Polk or Skadden come in and scoop them, if we're going to 200 anyway? They all have the revenue and profits to do so. And doing so would be a boon to their associate morale, their associate retention, their lateral recruiting, and their OCI hiring.
Dpw? Theres pages of discussions in this thread

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:59 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
I just don't understand what's taking so long.
It's been explained in this thread a million times. The other biglaw firms are waiting to see what Cravath does, as there seems to be a real concern that they will go to $200K. The few that already matched likely did so to try and set the new market rate early to stave off going to $200K.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:01 pm

Twist: Cravath will stay at 190, but will top Milbank for fifth years and up to help retention.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:01 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
I just don't understand what's taking so long.
It's been explained in this thread a million times. The other biglaw firms are waiting to see what Cravath does, as there seems to be a real concern that they will go to $200K. The few that already matched likely did so to try and set the new market rate early to stave off going to $200K.
A "real" concern from underemployed associates on this thread.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:02 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
I just don't understand what's taking so long.
It's been explained in this thread a million times. The other biglaw firms are waiting to see what Cravath does, as there seems to be a real concern that they will go to $200K. The few that already matched likely did so to try and set the new market rate early to stave off going to $200K.
I meant what's taking Cravath so long.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:03 pm

The fact that other companies have been silent so far gives me the impression that they do not want to raise salaries. How likely is this scenario? Is it possible that with Milbank's salary increase, a new era has dawned, where law firms no longer offer the same salaries, even within V10?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:03 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
I just don't understand what's taking so long.
It's been explained in this thread a million times. The other biglaw firms are waiting to see what Cravath does, as there seems to be a real concern that they will go to $200K. The few that already matched likely did so to try and set the new market rate early to stave off going to $200K.
I meant what's taking Cravath so long.
A drunk partner dictated it, and now his assistant has to meet with five other assistants and a couple associates to figure out what he said so they can type the e-mail.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:06 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
I just don't understand what's taking so long.
It's been explained in this thread a million times. The other biglaw firms are waiting to see what Cravath does, as there seems to be a real concern that they will go to $200K. The few that already matched likely did so to try and set the new market rate early to stave off going to $200K.
I meant what's taking Cravath so long.
A drunk partner dictated it, and now his assistant has to meet with five other assistants and a couple associates to figure out what he said so they can type the e-mail.
Half serious, knowing the culture of timing emails to fuck other firms as much as possible, wouldn't surprise me if they release the news at 5pm just to keep everyone else scrambling.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:07 pm

Anonymous User wrote: Half serious, knowing the culture of timing emails to fuck other firms as much as possible, wouldn't surprise me if they release the news at 5pm just to keep everyone else scrambling.
They did usually wait to announce high profile partner departures until later in the day so that there isn't chatter among the staff.

User avatar
Clearly

Gold
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Clearly » Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:08 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
I just don't understand what's taking so long.
It's been explained in this thread a million times. The other biglaw firms are waiting to see what Cravath does, as there seems to be a real concern that they will go to $200K. The few that already matched likely did so to try and set the new market rate early to stave off going to $200K.
I meant what's taking Cravath so long.
A drunk partner dictated it, and now his assistant has to meet with five other assistants and a couple associates to figure out what he said so they can type the e-mail.
Half serious, knowing the culture of timing emails to fuck other firms as much as possible, wouldn't surprise me if they release the news at 5pm just to keep everyone else scrambling.
This. You think it's a coincidence Milbank happened to do this the morning after Cravaths partnership meeting?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432644
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:10 pm

Real question is why is Staci so bad at updating the scorecard? 3:09 and it's still not updated...

https://abovethelaw.com/2018/06/salary- ... ises-2018/

https://abovethelaw.com/2018/06/selendy ... -response/

Blindweaponsfumbler

New
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:33 pm

Re: NYC to 200k

Post by Blindweaponsfumbler » Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:10 pm

Anonymous User wrote:The fact that other companies have been silent so far gives me the impression that they do not want to raise salaries. How likely is this scenario? Is it possible that with Milbank's salary increase, a new era has dawned, where law firms no longer offer the same salaries, even within V10?
If this were the case wouldn’t the stratification be across firm quality?

What could be really interesting is different salaries across practice groups.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”