Columbia EIP 2016 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Skadden, S&C and L&W offers (all NY and all came 1-2 business days after my CB)
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
What day/time of day was your Latham CB?Anonymous User wrote:Skadden, S&C and L&W offers (all NY and all came 1-2 business days after my CB)
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Monday at 10:30am (heard back Wednesday morning)Anonymous User wrote:What day/time of day was your Latham CB?Anonymous User wrote:Skadden, S&C and L&W offers (all NY and all came 1-2 business days after my CB)
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Do firms expect you to do a second look after getting an offer (i.e. it demonstrates diligence)? Or do they not care whether you do or don't?
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Theory: strong positive correlation between interviewer giving you their card and getting dinged
Not 100% perfect, but seems to have largely held true for me through EIP and CBs
Not 100% perfect, but seems to have largely held true for me through EIP and CBs
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
The point of a second look for the firm is to give them an opportunity to persuade you to accept the offer. If you want to accept the offer without a second look, they'd be delighted.Anonymous User wrote:Do firms expect you to do a second look after getting an offer (i.e. it demonstrates diligence)? Or do they not care whether you do or don't?
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
I don't think there's any relation. I've gotten both offers and rejections from firms where I received business cardsAnonymous User wrote:Theory: strong positive correlation between interviewer giving you their card and getting dinged
Not 100% perfect, but seems to have largely held true for me through EIP and CBs
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Anonymous User wrote:Theory: strong positive correlation between interviewer giving you their card and getting dinged
Not 100% perfect, but seems to have largely held true for me through EIP and CBs
no. there is no correlation
- Wild Card
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:48 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
10 screener interviewers gave me their cards; 3 invited me to callbacks, 7 dinged me.Anonymous User wrote:Theory: strong positive correlation between interviewer giving you their card and getting dinged
Not 100% perfect, but seems to have largely held true for me through EIP and CBs
I actually felt my heart sink when one of callback interviewers offered me his card, "in case have more any questions." Well, I hear back sometime next week. Will update you.
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Anyone who interviewed at DPW (NY) or Paul Weiss (NY) last week hear back?
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
heard back from PW on Thursday, interviewed earlier in the weekAnonymous User wrote:Anyone who interviewed at DPW (NY) or Paul Weiss (NY) last week hear back?
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
What office?Anonymous User wrote:on MondayAnonymous User wrote:When was your callback?Anonymous User wrote:Ropes & Gray offer
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
I got my offer one day after my callback fyiAnonymous User wrote:Debevoise offer anyone?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Aside from me, who still doesn't have an offer?
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Paul Hastings offer
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Had a callback super day last Thursday for Proskauer (NY). Any words yet?
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
For those who don't have some uber specific practice area lined up -- Culture v Prestige? How are y'all weighing this? Would you go top 5 vault firm over a 10-15 vault firm every time?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
No, that would be dumb. Vault is only useful in broad swathes. There's likely zero distinction in prestige between a v5 and v10-15, except Wachtell and Williams & Connolly (which are the only firms in the range that substantially differ from the others in prestige).Anonymous User wrote:For those who don't have some uber specific practice area lined up -- Culture v Prestige? How are y'all weighing this? Would you go top 5 vault firm over a 10-15 vault firm every time?
If you are transactionally focused, S&C/DPW/Cravath/Simpson and maybe Skadden will have a narrow edge over other firms in the v20 (other than wachtell), so if you are completely neutral and want the broadest corporate group strength those might be defaults (but easily outweighed by other considerations). I wouldn't call this prestige.
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Anonymous User wrote:Paul Hastings offer
When was your callback?
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Hmm so issue I am facing now is basically while I am transactionally focused and enjoyed Skadden, Gibson was much more "friendly" I guess. Everyone from Gibson was just very kind and each interviewer sent a follow up once I got the offer encouraging me to attend a post-offer event and to answer any questions I may have. Skadden was my first choice going in and I think still is, but am curious how much weight others are giving to the "culture."jbagelboy wrote:No, that would be dumb. Vault is only useful in broad swathes. There's likely zero distinction in prestige between a v5 and v10-15, except Wachtell and Williams & Connolly (which are the only firms in the range that substantially differ from the others in prestige).Anonymous User wrote:For those who don't have some uber specific practice area lined up -- Culture v Prestige? How are y'all weighing this? Would you go top 5 vault firm over a 10-15 vault firm every time?
If you are transactionally focused, S&C/DPW/Cravath/Simpson and maybe Skadden will have a narrow edge over other firms in the v20 (other than wachtell), so if you are completely neutral and want the broadest corporate group strength those might be defaults (but easily outweighed by other considerations). I wouldn't call this prestige.
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
My philosophy on this is that the difference in "prestige" between firms like these is nonexistent. Look for the practices you want and the people you want to work with, that's going to be the thing that matters. Prestige is going to matter to your next employer theoretically, but any of the firms you've mentioned will be seen in the same way. Anyway, that's how I'm thinking about this.Anonymous User wrote:Hmm so issue I am facing now is basically while I am transactionally focused and enjoyed Skadden, Gibson was much more "friendly" I guess. Everyone from Gibson was just very kind and each interviewer sent a follow up once I got the offer encouraging me to attend a post-offer event and to answer any questions I may have. Skadden was my first choice going in and I think still is, but am curious how much weight others are giving to the "culture."jbagelboy wrote:No, that would be dumb. Vault is only useful in broad swathes. There's likely zero distinction in prestige between a v5 and v10-15, except Wachtell and Williams & Connolly (which are the only firms in the range that substantially differ from the others in prestige).Anonymous User wrote:For those who don't have some uber specific practice area lined up -- Culture v Prestige? How are y'all weighing this? Would you go top 5 vault firm over a 10-15 vault firm every time?
If you are transactionally focused, S&C/DPW/Cravath/Simpson and maybe Skadden will have a narrow edge over other firms in the v20 (other than wachtell), so if you are completely neutral and want the broadest corporate group strength those might be defaults (but easily outweighed by other considerations). I wouldn't call this prestige.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Shearman offer. Thursday CB.
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Anyone hear back from a late last week Cleary CB?
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Wild Card wrote:10 screener interviewers gave me their cards; 3 invited me to callbacks, 7 dinged me.Anonymous User wrote:Theory: strong positive correlation between interviewer giving you their card and getting dinged
Not 100% perfect, but seems to have largely held true for me through EIP and CBs
I actually felt my heart sink when one of callback interviewers offered me his card, "in case have more any questions." Well, I hear back sometime next week. Will update you.
I had an interviewer at EIP give me his card, look at my resume, read my phone number back to me, and asks me if that's correct because he's going to call me.... I have yet to hear back, not even a ding.
-
- Posts: 432596
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Columbia EIP 2016
Do non v20 firms take longer to give out offers after callbacks?? Like more than 2-3 days
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login