NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
JustHawkin wrote:SplitMyPants wrote:Rly don't like the turn this thread took
- fats provolone

- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Skadden killed everything
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
reality bites
mgmt is only concerned about maximizing PPP
not a chance we relive something similar to the great salary wars
LETS UNIONIZE
mgmt is only concerned about maximizing PPP
not a chance we relive something similar to the great salary wars
LETS UNIONIZE
- runthetrap1990

- Posts: 432
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 5:38 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
^ Didn't mean to anon
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
WestOfTheRest

- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Really?Anonymous User wrote:fats provolone wrote:why did bonuses go up last yr
M&A activity was at a record last year. This year is has fallen off significantly. Apparently, partners aren't happy with their 2-5M/year in the V10.
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/04/ma-hits- ... inner.html
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Well then on that note, I think we should start pushing for 200K nowWestOfTheRest wrote:Really?Anonymous User wrote:fats provolone wrote:why did bonuses go up last yr
M&A activity was at a record last year. This year is has fallen off significantly. Apparently, partners aren't happy with their 2-5M/year in the V10.
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/04/ma-hits- ... inner.html
- Desert Fox

- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
-
dixiecupdrinking

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
-
PMan99

- Posts: 349
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
From the article: "This time round, the M&A frenzy is being fueled by fewer deals, but with bigger price tags. The number of $10 billion plus deals is 40 percent higher than at the same time in 2007."WestOfTheRest wrote:Really?Anonymous User wrote:fats provolone wrote:why did bonuses go up last yr
M&A activity was at a record last year. This year is has fallen off significantly. Apparently, partners aren't happy with their 2-5M/year in the V10.
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/04/ma-hits- ... inner.html
Could explain it (although that's 07->15, if 14->15 had the same dynamic there would still be a decrease in lawyer work).
Just from anecdotes I've heard from friends around the industry I think law is in for a bit of a dip from the record '14 across the board. It's been too good for too long for litigation (which thrives best in or right after mild downturns) and I guess transactional is hitting a snag too, although the transactional bros at my firm seem busy enough, I know less about that. You aren't going to see many mega-securities lawsuits when everyone's stock is increasing year over year.
-
n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:00 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
The argument could be made that large NY firms are losing talent to large firms that pay 160K in other markets because of COL, but I don't know how true that is in practice, especially considering the obsession with Vault-prestige.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
lol nahn1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:The argument could be made that large NY firms are losing talent to large firms that pay 160K in other markets because of COL, but I don't know how true that is in practice, especially considering the obsession with Vault-prestige.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
MFH PRESTIGE WHORES gonna MFH PRESTIGE WHORE
i speak from personal experience
-
alleyoop86

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:42 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I think law firms should raise base salaries to continue attracting people to go to law school at all. Isn't enrollment at law schools much lower this year? And in SF or NY, getting a 110-120k starting position right out of college isn't uncommon, at least at tech or startup companies. Factor in not having law school debt and the extra 3 years of pay, and law school doesn't seem so enticing when your supposedly super high pay in biglaw isn't that much higher than what you can make in other jobs.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- UnfrozenCaveman

- Posts: 474
- Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:06 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
There is no world outside of law! Just kidding of course but there is more to recruiting than finding the best of the (currently down) existing talent pool. Gotta compete with business school, etc.alleyoop86 wrote:I think law firms should raise base salaries to continue attracting people to go to law school at all. Isn't enrollment at law schools much lower this year? And in SF or NY, getting a 110-120k starting position right out of college isn't uncommon, at least at tech or startup companies. Factor in not having law school debt and the extra 3 years of pay, and law school doesn't seem so enticing when your supposedly super high pay in biglaw isn't that much higher than what you can make in other jobs.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
-
ND2018

- Posts: 82
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 4:08 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
110-120k starting isn't uncommon? WTFalleyoop86 wrote:I think law firms should raise base salaries to continue attracting people to go to law school at all. Isn't enrollment at law schools much lower this year? And in SF or NY, getting a 110-120k starting position right out of college isn't uncommon, at least at tech or startup companies. Factor in not having law school debt and the extra 3 years of pay, and law school doesn't seem so enticing when your supposedly super high pay in biglaw isn't that much higher than what you can make in other jobs.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
Edit: From NY have friends straight out working in the market, it isn't even close.
- jkpolk

- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Nyc to 190k!!! I'm using my raise to buy a huge fish tank which I can drown myself in
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Second this. Have several friends who went into big tech straight out of undergrad. Salary was more like ~80-90 MAYBE. Although you did get stock, vesting schedules aren't the best, especially when there is some high turnover in these places.ND2018 wrote:110-120k starting isn't uncommon? WTFalleyoop86 wrote:I think law firms should raise base salaries to continue attracting people to go to law school at all. Isn't enrollment at law schools much lower this year? And in SF or NY, getting a 110-120k starting position right out of college isn't uncommon, at least at tech or startup companies. Factor in not having law school debt and the extra 3 years of pay, and law school doesn't seem so enticing when your supposedly super high pay in biglaw isn't that much higher than what you can make in other jobs.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
Edit: From NY have friends straight out working in the market, it isn't even close.
Edit: Also I seriously don't think anyone who has option of going big tech vs law school would choose law school. Everyone knows there is high costs, incredibly stressful work etc. People do it because they don't have the option of casually going to work at google usually.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
im buying a skydiving trip and a parachute with holes in itjkpolk wrote:Nyc to 190k!!! I'm using my raise to buy a huge fish tank which I can drown myself in
-
SplitMyPants

- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Do those markets, like Philly, pay NYC lockstep? If not, this argument probably won't hold up. My home secondary's lockstep is shit (they don't pay 160 tho)n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:The argument could be made that large NY firms are losing talent to large firms that pay 160K in other markets because of COL, but I don't know how true that is in practice, especially considering the obsession with Vault-prestige.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
- fats provolone

- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
how many people are thinking about the pay scale though (not that they shouldn't)SplitMyPants wrote:Do those markets, like Philly, pay NYC lockstep? If not, this argument probably won't hold up. My home secondary's lockstep is shit (they don't pay 160 tho)n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:The argument could be made that large NY firms are losing talent to large firms that pay 160K in other markets because of COL, but I don't know how true that is in practice, especially considering the obsession with Vault-prestige.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
new prediction: 1st year salary to 190, rest of pay scale stays the same
-
rawrpalooza

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 7:20 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I think that applies more to the major markets that do pay NYC lockstep (i.e. LA, SF, Chi, DC). Anecdotally, multiple people at my school turned down CSM/S&C/DPW for big firms in Chi/LA, partially due to the CoL issue.SplitMyPants wrote:Do those markets, like Philly, pay NYC lockstep? If not, this argument probably won't hold up. My home secondary's lockstep is shit (they don't pay 160 tho)n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:The argument could be made that large NY firms are losing talent to large firms that pay 160K in other markets because of COL, but I don't know how true that is in practice, especially considering the obsession with Vault-prestige.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
abl

- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:07 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
The law firms who drive the salary raises aren't the law firms who are really hurting from the talent drain. If anything, as the bottom has fallen out, the difference between elite graduates and non-elite graduates has grown wider--which actually provides the most elite law firms with a relative competitive advantage. 5-10 years ago, the top law schools and top law firms could have filled their entire class with folks that they rejected and seen reasonably little difference. That's not as much of the case anymore. If anyone in private practice is really feeling the heat from this right now, it's the lower T100 firms--firms that may be at market now, but aren't going to be driving any increase in market rate.alleyoop86 wrote:I think law firms should raise base salaries to continue attracting people to go to law school at all. Isn't enrollment at law schools much lower this year? And in SF or NY, getting a 110-120k starting position right out of college isn't uncommon, at least at tech or startup companies. Factor in not having law school debt and the extra 3 years of pay, and law school doesn't seem so enticing when your supposedly super high pay in biglaw isn't that much higher than what you can make in other jobs.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
I think a much more sensible justification for a market rate increase is if top firms are losing out on candidates to less elite firms in lower COL locations who also pay market (which I think is unlikely to be happening much more now than it did ~5 years ago) or if top firms are struggling with retention (which I think is likely). The problem is that if retention is the issue, what's the point in raising first year salary? It'd make sense to increase lockstep (or bonuses), but for second- or third-years--or at whatever levels that retention starts to come into play.
Last edited by abl on Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
dixiecupdrinking

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Any individual law firm's interest in encouraging college seniors to take the LSAT is ludicrously attenuated. There is no way anyone in a position to increase salaries is thinking about inducing people to attend law school.alleyoop86 wrote:I think law firms should raise base salaries to continue attracting people to go to law school at all. Isn't enrollment at law schools much lower this year? And in SF or NY, getting a 110-120k starting position right out of college isn't uncommon, at least at tech or startup companies. Factor in not having law school debt and the extra 3 years of pay, and law school doesn't seem so enticing when your supposedly super high pay in biglaw isn't that much higher than what you can make in other jobs.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
- jkpolk

- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
There is definitely pressure from other industries w/r/t junior retention and recruitment yields at elite firms. Encouraging credentialed people to choose law is a struggle even after law school matriculation.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Any individual law firm's interest in encouraging college seniors to take the LSAT is ludicrously attenuated. There is no way anyone in a position to increase salaries is thinking about inducing people to attend law school.alleyoop86 wrote:I think law firms should raise base salaries to continue attracting people to go to law school at all. Isn't enrollment at law schools much lower this year? And in SF or NY, getting a 110-120k starting position right out of college isn't uncommon, at least at tech or startup companies. Factor in not having law school debt and the extra 3 years of pay, and law school doesn't seem so enticing when your supposedly super high pay in biglaw isn't that much higher than what you can make in other jobs.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I think most firms are stable/fine. There are always exceptions but that's unrelated to the broader market. But the first year salary increase is a solution in search of a problem if we're being honest. People saying that COL has gone up are missing the point. There are no better paying options, and nothing even close to biglaw.BigZuck wrote:I'm probably just naive and don't really know anything about anything but considering how much firms have scaled back on summer programs and summer class sizes and the fact that there is a dearth of midlevels as is and the fact that lots of firms pulled in record profits as of last year I'm not really worried about widespread layoffs.
(says the law student)
Don't really think salaries are going up any time soon either though of course.
- fats provolone

- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
even if true, there is zero chance any law firm comp committee is thinking about encouraging 0Ls to go to law school by raising salaries
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
