(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Post
by Big Shrimpin » Sun Jan 25, 2015 11:33 pm
anonnymouse wrote:KM2016 wrote:rpupkin wrote:mvp99 wrote:New scale from a legitimate source:
190
200
210
245
265
275
290
310
Confirmed.
This is too good to be true, right?
Good lord the millennials have turned this bort to SPS.
NYC to 190, Texas to 4000 sq ft wife and a new (not CPO) lexis.
havent seen teh 4000 sqft wife meme in a while
fuk yeh
-
utahraptor

- Posts: 3439
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2014 1:05 pm
Post
by utahraptor » Mon Jan 26, 2015 12:55 am
you all ready for the 190 announcement this week?
-
84651846190

- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Post
by 84651846190 » Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:19 am
utahraptor wrote:you all ready for the 190 announcement this week?
No, but I'm ready for everyone ITT to stfu.
-
utahraptor

- Posts: 3439
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2014 1:05 pm
Post
by utahraptor » Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:20 am
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:utahraptor wrote:you all ready for the 190 announcement this week?
No, but I'm ready for everyone ITT to stfu.
what do you mean? you're ready to say "I told you so" because you knew about NY to 190 first?
-
cookiejar1

- Posts: 867
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:07 am
Post
by cookiejar1 » Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:41 am
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:utahraptor wrote:you all ready for the 190 announcement this week?
No, but I'm ready for everyone ITT to stfu.
I heard from a reputable source (V19) that biglaw salaries won't be going up until a certain thread on TLS hits 100 pages.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
cookiejar1

- Posts: 867
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:07 am
Post
by cookiejar1 » Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:41 am
We got work to do, boys.
-
Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Post
by Big Shrimpin » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:04 pm
utahraptor wrote:you all ready for the 190 announcement this week?
hoaping for NY to 190 (inches of snow)
but will still prob have to go in tmrw fml
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:25 pm
Sorry to break the baseless speculation and for necro-ing this thread. But any views on whether the recent article in the FT about junior IB associates salaries going up by up to 20% is a possible indicator that big law should follow? I feel like that is the best indicator out there yet. Thoughts.
-
utahraptor

- Posts: 3439
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2014 1:05 pm
Post
by utahraptor » Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:26 pm
fats provolone wrote:just asking questions
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Post
by rpupkin » Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:29 pm
Anonymous User wrote:Sorry to break the baseless speculation and for necro-ing this thread. But any views on whether the recent article in the FT about junior IB associates salaries going up by up to 20% is a possible indicator that big law should follow? I feel like that is the best indicator out there yet. Thoughts.
Excellent.
-
84651846190

- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Post
by 84651846190 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:02 am
dixiecupdrinking wrote:Why does anyone think banking salaries have anything to do with lawyer salaries?
because hoap
-
Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Post
by Big Shrimpin » Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:05 pm
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:dixiecupdrinking wrote:Why does anyone think banking salaries have anything to do with lawyer salaries?
because hoap
yeh, and then they learn
it hurts, but that hoap fades
what remains is a void of dispair
when u realize that u only make like $35/hr after taxes
and have no life outside of werk
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:09 pm
Wonder how this would effect a satellite of one of the big three philly firms?
-
rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Post
by rpupkin » Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:17 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wonder how this would effect a satellite of one of the big three philly firms?
Isn't it obvious? A satellite hoping to compete with the big three (who can attract associates by virtue of Philly prestige) would have to bump up associate salaries even higher. And then the big three will feel compelled to respond in kind. The only question is who will flinch first in this game of associate-recruiting chicken.
The winners of this bidding war will be the associates. And the losers, of course, will be the partners who work for firms with significant Philly presences--their precious PPPs are about to take a major hit. Stay tuned.
-
Monochromatic Oeuvre

- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Post
by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:36 pm
rpupkin wrote:
Isn't it obvious? A satellite hoping to compete with the big three (who can attract associates by virtue of Philly prestige) would have to bump up associate salaries even higher. And then the big three will feel compelled to respond in kind. The only question is who will flinch first in this game of associate-recruiting chicken.
The winners of this bidding war will be the associates. And the losers, of course, will be the partners who work for firms with significant Philly presences--their precious PPPs are about to take a major hit. Stay tuned.
I mean, we could debate whether somewhere in the neighborhood of 2-4% is a "major hit" at a firm with $2M PPP. But point stands that the partners will no doubt be screaming about how atrium renovations in Fort Lauderdale don't pay for themselves.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Post
by chuckbass » Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:45 pm
rpupkin wrote:Anonymous User wrote:
Wonder how this would effect a satellite of one of the big three philly firms?
Isn't it obvious? A satellite hoping to compete with the big three (who can attract associates by virtue of Philly prestige) would have to bump up associate salaries even higher. And then the big three will feel compelled to respond in kind. The only question is who will flinch first in this game of associate-recruiting chicken.
The winners of this bidding war will be the associates. And the losers, of course, will be the partners who work for firms with significant Philly presences--their precious PPPs are about to take a major hit. Stay tuned.
Honestly, making less than market in Philly is still "winning" though
-
nealric

- Posts: 4390
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Post
by nealric » Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:06 am
W&C traditionally does not have true first years (everyone clerks) or pay bonuses. They are also more of a boutique, so I don't really see them as much of a market indicator.
In any event, I predict this round of raises will see the V20 (ish) firms start to depart from the rest of the v100 (ish) firms in comp. We shall see.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Fri Apr 17, 2015 3:04 pm
going up? not likely. but going down when the bubble in the stock market collapses? very likely.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
JasonSehorn

- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:24 pm
Post
by JasonSehorn » Fri Apr 17, 2015 3:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:going up? not likely. but going down when the bubble in the stock market collapses? very likely.
Going down from what? 160k? That mark was set in 2007 prior to crash. Why would they go down?
-
exitoptions

- Posts: 263
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:58 am
Post
by exitoptions » Fri Apr 17, 2015 3:18 pm
JasonSehorn wrote:Anonymous User wrote:going up? not likely. but going down when the bubble in the stock market collapses? very likely.
Going down from what? 160k? That mark was set in 2007 prior to crash. Why would they go down?
Inflation.
-
JasonSehorn

- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:24 pm
Post
by JasonSehorn » Fri Apr 17, 2015 3:20 pm
exitoptions wrote:JasonSehorn wrote:Anonymous User wrote:going up? not likely. but going down when the bubble in the stock market collapses? very likely.
Going down from what? 160k? That mark was set in 2007 prior to crash. Why would they go down?
Inflation.
They've already gone down from inflation and will continue to do so. 160k today is about 180k or so on 2007.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login