I think we might be disagreeing over terminology; "this summer." The offer my friend has from foley is to be a SA in 2013. That offer explicitly says they expect the program to be 10 weeks. Can't speak to this past summer (2012).Anonymous User wrote:I just checked with someone who was an SA at Foley this summer. The program was definitely shortened to 8 weeks for this summer.Anonymous User wrote:
Re: Foley. This summer is 10 weeks. Friend has offer.
Firms to avoid Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
I don't think that's correct. Their revenues were up this year (firm wide revenues, that is. You're right, I don't have a financial breakdown for the Dallas office on its own). Yes, like other firms, they had some layoffs during the recession which probably contributed to their overall revenues increasing. As for no-offering lots of people in the past, all I can say is look at NALP. Traditionally many Texas firms (because students split their summers) have had slightly lower offer rates than NE firms. Two years ago they had a fairly small summer class but still gave a higher offer % than say Haynes & Boone. This year Locke Lord's Dallas class was around 13 and every person I've talked to so far has gotten an offer (at least 11).Anonymous User wrote: Rumor is they're having financial trouble like several other Dallas firms. They have been known to no-offer lots of people for "fit" in years past but did pretty well this year. They also appear to have reduced the size of their Dallas SA class, however.
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Ah, there was the confusion. Yes, Summer 2012 was 8 weeks long. You may want to let your friend with the Summer 2013 offer know that the Summer 2012 program was also slated to be 10 weeks long but was cut to 8 sometime in the Spring.Anonymous User wrote:I think we might be disagreeing over terminology; "this summer." The offer my friend has from foley is to be a SA in 2013. That offer explicitly says they expect the program to be 10 weeks. Can't speak to this past summer (2012).Anonymous User wrote:I just checked with someone who was an SA at Foley this summer. The program was definitely shortened to 8 weeks for this summer.Anonymous User wrote:
Re: Foley. This summer is 10 weeks. Friend has offer.
- pjo
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Re: Firms to avoid
Anonymous User wrote:I know they didn't show up to my school (MVP) because they claimed they were "filling their class with 1L SAs".Anonymous User wrote:Interested in what you heard about Squire Sanders.
We may be at the same school, but I'm also at MVP and they did the same thing. Also, I remeber a quote on ATL by John Quinn (of Quinn Emmanuel) in which he said of the potential Squire Sanders (I think Greenberg Taurig) merger: "It's like two sinking stones tying themselves together hoping they'll float". I have no interest in Quinn Emmanuel, but John Quinn is probably the most in-tune managing partner at any firm, and I highly value his opinion.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Firms to avoid
While he has a point, he's also full of shit 99% of the time and you really shouldn't put that much stock in what he says.pjo wrote:Anonymous User wrote:I know they didn't show up to my school (MVP) because they claimed they were "filling their class with 1L SAs".Anonymous User wrote:Interested in what you heard about Squire Sanders.
We may be at the same school, but I'm also at MVP and they did the same thing. Also, I remeber a quote on ATL by John Quinn (of Quinn Emmanuel) in which he said of the potential Squire Sanders (I think Greenberg Taurig) merger: "It's like two sinking stones tying themselves together hoping they'll float". I have no interest in Quinn Emmanuel, but John Quinn is probably the most in-tune managing partner at any firm, and I highly value his opinion.
To be frank, I'm glad the Samsung case blew up in his face. His comeuppance was long overdue.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- manofjustice
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 10:01 pm
Re: Firms to avoid
1L SAs? What the fuck does that mean?Anonymous User wrote:I know they didn't show up to my school (MVP) because they claimed they were "filling their class with 1L SAs".Anonymous User wrote:Interested in what you heard about Squire Sanders.
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
In a lot of the southwest, it is pretty common to have 1L SA positions. They're a lot harder to get than 2L SA's, but they do exist. They also make you far more marketable for 2L SA positions, for whatever reason.Anonymous User wrote:1L SAs? What the fuck does that mean?Anonymous User wrote:I know they didn't show up to my school (MVP) because they claimed they were "filling their class with 1L SAs".Anonymous User wrote:Interested in what you heard about Squire Sanders.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Firms to avoid
Outted as 0L in the employment forumAnonymous User wrote:
1L SAs? What the fuck does that mean?
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
FWIW, I had a CB with Goodwin recently and they sounded like they were full steam ahead in terms of expansion with satellite offices and work and I haven't seen anything to the contrary so I'd assume their doing well.Anonymous User wrote:Anyone know anything about how the big Boston firms are doing? Ropes, Wilmer, Goodwin, Bingham?
Ropes is Ropes. You'll have to do your own reading on them.
I can't speak to the other two but I certainly haven't seen any bad news about them. As a scrub law student, it seems like the Boston firms run a pretty tight ship. Haven't heard of any that have really put themselves in a dangerous spot.
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
anyone know whats up with Patton Boggs? they cancelled oci at my school claiming they aren't interviewing for summer 2013 class
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
That's weird. they definitely interviewed at UT.Anonymous User wrote:anyone know whats up with Patton Boggs? they cancelled oci at my school claiming they aren't interviewing for summer 2013 class
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Good info, TY, will do. Which office was your friend at? And do you have any info on their offer rate this past summer?Anonymous User wrote:Ah, there was the confusion. Yes, Summer 2012 was 8 weeks long. You may want to let your friend with the Summer 2013 offer know that the Summer 2012 program was also slated to be 10 weeks long but was cut to 8 sometime in the Spring.Anonymous User wrote:I think we might be disagreeing over terminology; "this summer." The offer my friend has from foley is to be a SA in 2013. That offer explicitly says they expect the program to be 10 weeks. Can't speak to this past summer (2012).Anonymous User wrote:I just checked with someone who was an SA at Foley this summer. The program was definitely shortened to 8 weeks for this summer.Anonymous User wrote:
Re: Foley. This summer is 10 weeks. Friend has offer.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:08 am
Re: Firms to avoid
What school and what office(s)?Anonymous User wrote:anyone know whats up with Patton Boggs? they cancelled oci at my school claiming they aren't interviewing for summer 2013 class
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Chicago and no idea on the offer rate, sorry.Anonymous User wrote:Good info, TY, will do. Which office was your friend at? And do you have any info on their offer rate this past summer?Anonymous User wrote:Ah, there was the confusion. Yes, Summer 2012 was 8 weeks long. You may want to let your friend with the Summer 2013 offer know that the Summer 2012 program was also slated to be 10 weeks long but was cut to 8 sometime in the Spring.Anonymous User wrote: I think we might be disagreeing over terminology; "this summer." The offer my friend has from foley is to be a SA in 2013. That offer explicitly says they expect the program to be 10 weeks. Can't speak to this past summer (2012).
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
They only interviewed for Dallas and Denver, FYI.Anonymous User wrote:That's weird. they definitely interviewed at UT.Anonymous User wrote:anyone know whats up with Patton Boggs? they cancelled oci at my school claiming they aren't interviewing for summer 2013 class
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Patton Boggs interviewed at my school and I have a callback with them. Any news of them not hiring for 2013 seems to be specific to just your school, unless they're flying me there and putting me in a hotel just for fun.Anonymous User wrote:They only interviewed for Dallas and Denver, FYI.Anonymous User wrote:That's weird. they definitely interviewed at UT.Anonymous User wrote:anyone know whats up with Patton Boggs? they cancelled oci at my school claiming they aren't interviewing for summer 2013 class
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
GP was rough for the past few years, but are really ramping up now and seem to be doing well. Given IP lit craziness, Wilmer has been holding really strong. R+G had voluntary deferrals last SA class, some of which may have been less voluntary than others.Anonymous User wrote:FWIW, I had a CB with Goodwin recently and they sounded like they were full steam ahead in terms of expansion with satellite offices and work and I haven't seen anything to the contrary so I'd assume their doing well.Anonymous User wrote:Anyone know anything about how the big Boston firms are doing? Ropes, Wilmer, Goodwin, Bingham?
Ropes is Ropes. You'll have to do your own reading on them.
I can't speak to the other two but I certainly haven't seen any bad news about them. As a scrub law student, it seems like the Boston firms run a pretty tight ship. Haven't heard of any that have really put themselves in a dangerous spot.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
cancelled my school too- NY not either of those ones...Anonymous User wrote:They only interviewed for Dallas and Denver, FYI.Anonymous User wrote:That's weird. they definitely interviewed at UT.Anonymous User wrote:anyone know whats up with Patton Boggs? they cancelled oci at my school claiming they aren't interviewing for summer 2013 class
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Firms to avoid
Look at last years thread. All the treads people warned about are doing fine, and the firms nobody worried about (Dewey, White and Case, Winston) are the ones doing shitty.
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Not sure if this has been posted yet, but Paul Hastings ATL no-offered roughly 40% of their summer class.
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Patton Boggs usually only has summer classes in Dallas an DC. Having them in multiple offices this past summer was an anomaly.Anonymous User wrote:cancelled my school too- NY not either of those ones...Anonymous User wrote:They only interviewed for Dallas and Denver, FYI.Anonymous User wrote:That's weird. they definitely interviewed at UT.Anonymous User wrote:anyone know whats up with Patton Boggs? they cancelled oci at my school claiming they aren't interviewing for summer 2013 class
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Pretty much every firm every year no-offers 40% of their class in ATL. That's just how they do things down there.Anonymous User wrote:Not sure if this has been posted yet, but Paul Hastings ATL no-offered roughly 40% of their summer class.
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
what were the offer rates for the other big ATL firms?rayiner wrote:Pretty much every firm every year no-offers 40% of their class in ATL. That's just how they do things down there.Anonymous User wrote:Not sure if this has been posted yet, but Paul Hastings ATL no-offered roughly 40% of their summer class.
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
I don't think this is accurate. Summer 2012 was always going to be 8 weeks. They never said differently. Summer 2013 will almost certainly be 10 weeks.Anonymous User wrote:Ah, there was the confusion. Yes, Summer 2012 was 8 weeks long. You may want to let your friend with the Summer 2013 offer know that the Summer 2012 program was also slated to be 10 weeks long but was cut to 8 sometime in the Spring.Anonymous User wrote:I think we might be disagreeing over terminology; "this summer." The offer my friend has from foley is to be a SA in 2013. That offer explicitly says they expect the program to be 10 weeks. Can't speak to this past summer (2012).Anonymous User wrote:I just checked with someone who was an SA at Foley this summer. The program was definitely shortened to 8 weeks for this summer.Anonymous User wrote:
Re: Foley. This summer is 10 weeks. Friend has offer.
-
- Posts: 431990
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Firms to avoid
Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote: R+G had voluntary deferrals last SA class, some of which may have been less voluntary than others.
nahhh they were all voluntary. i am from that class.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login