That is the exact same pair Bronte posted two pages ago. We all said they look pretty good. Burgundy is fine, but it may be too light for an interview. I'd stick with black or the darker cordovan shade.blowhard wrote:
What do you think about these but in a burgundy (lighter) for a dark navy suit? The sales guy at Macys said they sell a lot of these in burgundy for that reason. I think I'm going to buy these in black but I need to go over $100 so I can get 25% off tomorrow.
OCI/callbacks/etc Men's Clothing Mega-thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
-
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Yeah, I know. I was asking about the burgundy though... I'd probably wear the black shows for interviews but someone mentioned wearing cordovan for everyday wear earlier...romothesavior wrote:That is the exact same pair Bronte posted two pages ago. We all said they look pretty good. Burgundy is fine, but it may be too light for an interview. I'd stick with black or the darker cordovan shade.blowhard wrote:
What do you think about these but in a burgundy (lighter) for a dark navy suit? The sales guy at Macys said they sell a lot of these in burgundy for that reason. I think I'm going to buy these in black but I need to go over $100 so I can get 25% off tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Before I go back to the store...burgundy shoes (lighter reddish color) with a dark navy suit? Yes or no?
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I'd say yes, but too light for an interview. I have a pair of shoes exactly like the ones in the picture in a light reddish burgundy color and wear them with navy often.blowhard wrote:Before I go back to the store...burgundy shoes (lighter reddish color) with a dark navy suit? Yes or no?
- Duralex
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:25 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
The most conservative answer is no--the shade of burgundy/cordovan/oxblood needs to be as dark or darker than the suit. I tend to think there's a little leeway here, but if you want to play it safe get 'em darker.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Nothing wrong with it for wearing around the office.Duralex wrote:The most conservative answer is no--the shade of burgundy/cordovan/oxblood needs to be as dark or darker than the suit. I tend to think there's a little leeway here, but if you want to play it safe get 'em darker.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Also, does anyone here have an opinion on button-down collars on dress shirts?
- Duralex
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:25 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Agree that they're fine for the office--I had the impression he wanted dual-purpose. I like the way burgundy looks--and it wears well. Develops 'character' where black just starts to look shabby.
Button down debate can be like a holy war. I tend to think it depends on the shape of your face/neck. If it's flattering for you it might be worth it to look for suits that go well with them. I can't say exactly what that means, but I know it when I see it. Some jackets look right with them, some really don't.
That probably isn't too helpful.
Flusser doesn't have much to say about it except that they can look "casually stylish" but are "too often favored by exactly the kind of men who should avoid them--the double-chinned set. Softer-chinned men need slightly higher and firmer collars to compensate for the lack of a strong line under their face."
(Style and the Man, p.26)
Button down debate can be like a holy war. I tend to think it depends on the shape of your face/neck. If it's flattering for you it might be worth it to look for suits that go well with them. I can't say exactly what that means, but I know it when I see it. Some jackets look right with them, some really don't.
That probably isn't too helpful.
Flusser doesn't have much to say about it except that they can look "casually stylish" but are "too often favored by exactly the kind of men who should avoid them--the double-chinned set. Softer-chinned men need slightly higher and firmer collars to compensate for the lack of a strong line under their face."
(Style and the Man, p.26)
Last edited by Duralex on Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I'm getting the same shoes in black/burgundy. I'd wear black for the interviews. I have to break $100 to get 25% off and that is the best deal I can find on a decent leather-soled shoe.Duralex wrote:Agree that they're fine for the office--I had the impression he wanted dual-purpose. I like the way burgundy looks--and it wears well. Develops 'character' where black just starts to look shabby.
Button down debate can be like a holy war. I tend to think it depends on the shape of your face/neck. If it's flattering for you it might be worth it to look for suits that go well with them. I can't say exactly what that means, but I know it when I see it. Some jackets look right with them, some really don't.
That probably isn't too helpful.
- Waterman47
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I laughed.romothesavior wrote:Also, does anyone here have an opinion on button-down collars on dress shirts?
- Duralex
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:25 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Yeah...I wasn't sure.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:32 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Waterman47 wrote:I laughed.romothesavior wrote:Also, does anyone here have an opinion on button-down collars on dress shirts?
- BunkMoreland
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:16 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
for what it's worth, I was feeling adventurous and popped in my pocket square for my cleary interview recently. If dude noticed he didn't say anything at all, and I got a callback. Don't fret too much over this stuff guys.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mr. Fancy
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:22 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
same. i actually recieved multiple complements on mine and got more call backs than not - so it couldnt have hurt too muchBunkMoreland wrote:for what it's worth, I was feeling adventurous and popped in my pocket square for my cleary interview recently. If dude noticed he didn't say anything at all, and I got a callback. Don't fret too much over this stuff guys.

- HenryKillinger
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:56 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I think David Beckham's suit needs some attention here.
--ImageRemoved--
I commend him for the three piece, but everything else is facepalm.
--ImageRemoved--
I commend him for the three piece, but everything else is facepalm.
- Clint Eastwood
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 2:15 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Yikes.HenryKillinger wrote:I think David Beckham's suit needs some attention here.
--ImageRemoved--
I commend him for the three piece, but everything else is facepalm.
- zettsscores40
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Meh it's Hollywood and he's rich and famous. He can get away with it.HenryKillinger wrote:I think David Beckham's suit needs some attention here.
--ImageRemoved--
I commend him for the three piece, but everything else is facepalm.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- HenryKillinger
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:56 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
But why does he want to get away with that?zettsscores40 wrote:Meh it's Hollywood and he's rich and famous. He can get away with it.HenryKillinger wrote:I think David Beckham's suit needs some attention here.
--ImageRemoved--
I commend him for the three piece, but everything else is facepalm.
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
It looks like something a 1940's gang boss would have made for himself while in prison.HenryKillinger wrote:But why does he want to get away with that?zettsscores40 wrote:Meh it's Hollywood and he's rich and famous. He can get away with it.HenryKillinger wrote:I think David Beckham's suit needs some attention here.
--ImageRemoved--
I commend him for the three piece, but everything else is facepalm.
- zettsscores40
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Cause he can.HenryKillinger wrote:But why does he want to get away with that?zettsscores40 wrote:Meh it's Hollywood and he's rich and famous. He can get away with it.HenryKillinger wrote:I think David Beckham's suit needs some attention here.
--ImageRemoved--
I commend him for the three piece, but everything else is facepalm.
- HenryKillinger
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:56 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I'm having a hard time figuring his lapel out. Is that a double notch on the right (his left) lapel?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I think it's just an ugly suit-induced optical illusionHenryKillinger wrote:I'm having a hard time figuring his lapel out. Is that a double notch on the right (his left) lapel?
- HenryKillinger
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:56 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
It is indeed. I ctrl+zoomed in like crazy and its actually an exaggerated peak lapel. The button hole on his left lapel just looks like a shadow created by a notch. Damn these low resolution photos.Renzo wrote:I think it's just an ugly suit-induced optical illusionHenryKillinger wrote:I'm having a hard time figuring his lapel out. Is that a double notch on the right (his left) lapel?
- zettsscores40
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
How do you guys feel about tie bars on a regular basis?
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
The same way I feel about pencil protectors.zettsscores40 wrote:How do you guys feel about tie bars on a regular basis?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login