Summer Associate Class of 2016 Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

What's the damage so far this summer?

I've actually lost weight.
37
23%
Essentially the same.
34
21%
2-5 pounds
34
21%
5-10 pounds
26
16%
10-15 pounds
10
6%
It's bad.
21
13%
 
Total votes: 162

User avatar
PeanutsNJam

Gold
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by PeanutsNJam » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:19 pm

Yeah if Chi/LA/DC can match, then NYC will be worse off. NYC firms have to raise salaries by more than other cities can afford to.

NYC to 190

cannibal ox

Gold
Posts: 4075
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by cannibal ox » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:27 pm

#180 #blessed #extraguac #biglawbigmoney

User avatar
Serett

Moderator
Posts: 16088
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:06 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Serett » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:40 pm

Milwaukee to 160?! :lol:

Anonymous User
Posts: 432524
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Jun 07, 2016 1:53 am

uh so latham is like 100% offer rate right?

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by sublime » Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:01 am

..

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by El Pollito » Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:05 am

Are they going to no offer extra people to get to 180K?

User avatar
BizBro

Silver
Posts: 705
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:21 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by BizBro » Tue Jun 07, 2016 6:13 am

El Pollito wrote:Are they going to no offer extra people to get to 180K?
I feel like that's a bad idea. Seems like stealth layoffs of upper class-men would be a better idea.
God 180k in a non-NYC market sounds amazing and idk why people would want to be in NYC.

User avatar
runthetrap1990

Bronze
Posts: 432
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by runthetrap1990 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:09 am

Serett wrote:Milwaukee to 160?! :lol:
Would make Milwaukee the go to. 160K in Wisconsin would have you living like royalty.

First purchase would DEFINITELY be Badgers football season tickets.

User avatar
Slytherpuff

Platinum
Posts: 5401
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:50 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Slytherpuff » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:36 am

cannibal ox wrote:#180 #blessed #extraguac #biglawbigmoney
:!:

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
JenDarby

Diamond
Posts: 17362
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by JenDarby » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:49 am

BizBro wrote:
El Pollito wrote:Are they going to no offer extra people to get to 180K?
I feel like that's a bad idea. Seems like stealth layoffs of upper class-men would be a better idea.
God 180k in a non-NYC market sounds amazing and idk why people would want to be in NYC.
no offering a couple SAs here and there wouldn't raise any huge red flags, just cold offer them

Bach-City

Bronze
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:00 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Bach-City » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:20 am

.
Last edited by Bach-City on Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by El Pollito » Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:29 am

JenDarby wrote:
BizBro wrote:
El Pollito wrote:Are they going to no offer extra people to get to 180K?
I feel like that's a bad idea. Seems like stealth layoffs of upper class-men would be a better idea.
God 180k in a non-NYC market sounds amazing and idk why people would want to be in NYC.
no offering a couple SAs here and there wouldn't raise any huge red flags, just cold offer them
exactly, esp for the non-100% firms

also if you no offer one or 2 SAs people will victim blame instead of firm blame

seems much easier than firing people who know things

lavarman84

Platinum
Posts: 8535
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by lavarman84 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 7:38 pm

sublime wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:uh so latham is like 100% offer rate right?
Idk what does Nalp say?

But yea, as far as I know unless coke and hookers are involved
Even then, you have to cross the line with the coke and hookers. :lol:

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
20160810

Diamond
Posts: 18121
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by 20160810 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 7:41 pm

lawman84 wrote:
sublime wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:uh so latham is like 100% offer rate right?
Idk what does Nalp say?

But yea, as far as I know unless coke and hookers are involved
Even then, you have to cross the line with the coke and hookers. :lol:
(Mid level cuts lines from pile.)

(Summer leans over and snorts the pile.)

Anonymous User
Posts: 432524
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:14 pm

Brad Karp sent out an email to all PW summers announcing that our salaries would be raised to $3.5K a week on July 1 as well.

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:20 pm

SBL wrote:
lawman84 wrote:
sublime wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:uh so latham is like 100% offer rate right?
Idk what does Nalp say?

But yea, as far as I know unless coke and hookers are involved
Even then, you have to cross the line with the coke and hookers. :lol:
(Mid level cuts lines from pile.)

(Summer leans over and snorts the pile.)
Partner-level move.

Magic Hat

Bronze
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:07 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Magic Hat » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:57 pm

BizBro wrote:
El Pollito wrote:Are they going to no offer extra people to get to 180K?
I feel like that's a bad idea. Seems like stealth layoffs of upper class-men would be a better idea.
God 180k in a non-NYC market sounds amazing and idk why people would want to be in NYC.
Do you actually think firms would cut profitable,hard to come by and experienced mid levels/seniors to avoid cold offering a few SAs?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


barkschool

Silver
Posts: 1024
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:05 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by barkschool » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:09 am

Magic Hat wrote:
BizBro wrote:
El Pollito wrote:Are they going to no offer extra people to get to 180K?
I feel like that's a bad idea. Seems like stealth layoffs of upper class-men would be a better idea.
God 180k in a non-NYC market sounds amazing and idk why people would want to be in NYC.
Do you actually think firms would cut profitable,hard to come by and experienced mid levels/seniors to avoid cold offering a few SAs?
Have we ruled out the ReedSmith-ing, of firing droves of second tier partners?

User avatar
BizBro

Silver
Posts: 705
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:21 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by BizBro » Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:50 am

PW raised summers' salaries up to 3500

Anonymous User
Posts: 432524
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:17 am

BizBro wrote:PW raised summers' salaries up to 3500
Old news bro. Cleary SAs just got their salary raised this morning.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432524
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:46 pm

Had two assignments due last Friday, and on Thursday evening I got an email that said something like "If you're free I might have some things you can help me out with. " for an older associate.

Basically wrote back saying I'm finishing up a bunch of stuff tomorrow but I'd be happy to help next week. Never heard back. Did I handle this situation right? It's been nagging me.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


mushybrain

Bronze
Posts: 397
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 2:08 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by mushybrain » Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:49 pm

Yes. You can follow up with that associate now if you want.

lavarman84

Platinum
Posts: 8535
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by lavarman84 » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:02 pm

The work I did was actually used today. Was kind of cool seeing that at least some of what I do actually is used by the firm.

User avatar
EzraFitz

Silver
Posts: 764
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:42 am

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by EzraFitz » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:23 pm

Yeah, nearly identical thing happened here, reached out the next week, and got a "thank so much, really appreciate you getting back to me, have nothing now, but will let you know if something comes up" kind of response.

User avatar
20160810

Diamond
Posts: 18121
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: Summer Associate Class of 2016

Post by 20160810 » Wed Jun 08, 2016 9:03 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Had two assignments due last Friday, and on Thursday evening I got an email that said something like "If you're free I might have some things you can help me out with. " for an older associate.

Basically wrote back saying I'm finishing up a bunch of stuff tomorrow but I'd be happy to help next week. Never heard back. Did I handle this situation right? It's been nagging me.
I would have said something like

"I would be happy to help? When do you need this done? I have two deadlines tomorrow, so a 24-hour turnaround will be difficult, but I'm more than happy to work on it over the weekend."

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”