NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
well yeah no shit of course youd rather go home at 3 pm. come to think of it id most want to just win the lottery than work.
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Hey, dude, you're the one who called that guy's life your "dream." Anyway, the 7-7 dude clearly has it better than many in big law, I'll grant you that. It just doesn't seem ideal. My life sucks but I'm still at work fewer than 12 hours a day for most days of the year. And I get a market bonus.JohannDeMann wrote:well yeah no shit of course youd rather go home at 3 pm. come to think of it id most want to just win the lottery than work.
-
Nekrowizard

- Posts: 367
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:53 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
It seems like the guy forewent 200K to dick around at work for 6 hours a day for 8 years (doing fun office activities? Shitposting on TLS?).JohannDeMann wrote:well yeah no shit of course youd rather go home at 3 pm. come to think of it id most want to just win the lottery than work.
- Old Gregg

- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
keep in mind, the chances of you actually having a career in biglaw beyond year 8 by doing this only increase by maybe 1%.dixiecupdrinking wrote:How about working the same hours, billing more, getting bonuses, and having an actual post-biglaw career?JohannDeMann wrote:billing 1700 to keep getting promoted? if you're a partner's right hand it probably means you aren't doing much grunt work but concerned with the strategy stuff etc. 7-7 at the office with a few hours of dicking around seems credited to me. pulled in a million after 5 years without bonus. what's not to love? you could easily have a family on that lifestyle and still retire at age 45/50 if you wanted to.
-
BlackAndOrange84

- Posts: 396
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:06 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
As a long-time lurker, I for one am sorely disappointed by the petering out of this thread.
Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?
Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
When STB raised salaries from 145 to 160, they did it in January, shortly after bonus season. When NY salaries go up, it'll probably be after the holiday season. January is the best time to raise salaries because lateral hiring usually freezes until bonuses get paid out, but as soon as bonus checks cash, tons of associates jump ship.
That in mind, I wonder what 2015 Christmas/Holiday bonuses will look like. They were up last year--you have to imagine they'll be up again this year as firms have continued to do very well.
That in mind, I wonder what 2015 Christmas/Holiday bonuses will look like. They were up last year--you have to imagine they'll be up again this year as firms have continued to do very well.
- Byakuya769

- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Most posts were flames, now that it looks as a foregone conclusion, a lot of the flamers are talking to recruiters right now.BlackAndOrange84 wrote:As a long-time lurker, I for one am sorely disappointed by the petering out of this thread.
Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?
-
FSK

- Posts: 8058
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
1% * BOATLOADS of Cash made during a 20 year tenure as equity party = A SOLID EXPECTED VALUE CHOICE. Just do the math, bruh. You're throwing cash away otherwise.Old Gregg wrote:keep in mind, the chances of you actually having a career in biglaw beyond year 8 by doing this only increase by maybe 1%.dixiecupdrinking wrote:How about working the same hours, billing more, getting bonuses, and having an actual post-biglaw career?JohannDeMann wrote:billing 1700 to keep getting promoted? if you're a partner's right hand it probably means you aren't doing much grunt work but concerned with the strategy stuff etc. 7-7 at the office with a few hours of dicking around seems credited to me. pulled in a million after 5 years without bonus. what's not to love? you could easily have a family on that lifestyle and still retire at age 45/50 if you wanted to.
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
bonuses will probably be about the same and salaries are going up is what its looking like. bonuses should be dope if firms arent matching or salaries dont go up. either way, total comp is going up by a decent margin.Anonymous User wrote:When STB raised salaries from 145 to 160, they did it in January, shortly after bonus season. When NY salaries go up, it'll probably be after the holiday season. January is the best time to raise salaries because lateral hiring usually freezes until bonuses get paid out, but as soon as bonus checks cash, tons of associates jump ship.
That in mind, I wonder what 2015 Christmas/Holiday bonuses will look like. They were up last year--you have to imagine they'll be up again this year as firms have continued to do very well.
- NoBladesNoBows

- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 7:39 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Last edited by NoBladesNoBows on Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Traynor Brah

- Posts: 776
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
bothNoBladesNoBows wrote:Wait has 190k actually been confirmed beyond supposed-STB doc/their response, or has this thread just been so effective that we're taking 190k as a given now?
-
umichman

- Posts: 363
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:56 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Incoming summer at high ranking big law. They have made no mention of what the salary is in the offer letter nor any subsequent communication. Pretty sure they are waiting so that they can tell use the pay is 3600/wk
- Old Gregg

- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
this has always been the case.umichman wrote:Incoming summer at high ranking big law. They have made no mention of what the salary is in the offer letter nor any subsequent communication. Pretty sure they are waiting so that they can tell use the pay is 3600/wk
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Br3v

- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Man people have always been getting paid at 190 rate? I missed out.Old Gregg wrote:this has always been the case.umichman wrote:Incoming summer at high ranking big law. They have made no mention of what the salary is in the offer letter nor any subsequent communication. Pretty sure they are waiting so that they can tell use the pay is 3600/wk
- fats provolone

- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
190 was confirmed a long time ago. you should sue for back pay.Br3v wrote:Man people have always been getting paid at 190 rate? I missed out.Old Gregg wrote:this has always been the case.umichman wrote:Incoming summer at high ranking big law. They have made no mention of what the salary is in the offer letter nor any subsequent communication. Pretty sure they are waiting so that they can tell use the pay is 3600/wk
-
dixiecupdrinking

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Shut up, GREGGOld Gregg wrote:this has always been the case.umichman wrote:Incoming summer at high ranking big law. They have made no mention of what the salary is in the offer letter nor any subsequent communication. Pretty sure they are waiting so that they can tell use the pay is 3600/wk
-
anonnymouse

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Neither actually. Some of us who have in-the-know contacts have gotten together to vet a second document that has surfaced. Different template/format than STB and I won't hint at who until we've fully vetted but safe to say it looks like there will for sure be comp stratification among firms.BlackAndOrange84 wrote:As a long-time lurker, I for one am sorely disappointed by the petering out of this thread.
Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
What kind of V range are we talking about for this new document? Can you give us that?
- smaug

- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
are you worried your tiny pink firm won't match or something?Anonymous User wrote:What kind of V range are we talking about for this new document? Can you give us that?
- Old Gregg

- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
love it!anonnymouse wrote:Neither actually. Some of us who have in-the-know contacts have gotten together to vet a second document that has surfaced. Different template/format than STB and I won't hint at who until we've fully vetted but safe to say it looks like there will for sure be comp stratification among firms.BlackAndOrange84 wrote:As a long-time lurker, I for one am sorely disappointed by the petering out of this thread.
Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?
-
anonnymouse

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
OG I know you are on board with this. Think how IRATE Johannn will be when his all-in comp bumps his PAYE payments above what his SoFi refi payments would have been!!!Old Gregg wrote:love it!anonnymouse wrote:Neither actually. Some of us who have in-the-know contacts have gotten together to vet a second document that has surfaced. Different template/format than STB and I won't hint at who until we've fully vetted but safe to say it looks like there will for sure be comp stratification among firms.BlackAndOrange84 wrote:As a long-time lurker, I for one am sorely disappointed by the petering out of this thread.
Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
anonnymouse

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Not willing to disclose any further info until this new doc is fully vetted. We are having to work slowly and discreetly. Sorry.Anonymous User wrote:What kind of V range are we talking about for this new document? Can you give us that?
- Br3v

- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Firm hasn't set salary yet, but said that last year's incoming salary was "160,000."
Not sure what to think of it but I would say it's more than a subtle hint that a 6 is an upside down 9.
Anyone else's firm say this?
Not sure what to think of it but I would say it's more than a subtle hint that a 6 is an upside down 9.
Anyone else's firm say this?
- Old Gregg

- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
everyone's firm says this.Br3v wrote:Firm hasn't set salary yet, but said that last year's incoming salary was "160,000."
Not sure what to think of it but I would say it's more than a subtle hint that a 6 is an upside down 9.
Anyone else's firm say this?
-
Traynor Brah

- Posts: 776
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
dixiecupdrinking wrote: Shut up, GREGG
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login