NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:49 pm

well yeah no shit of course youd rather go home at 3 pm. come to think of it id most want to just win the lottery than work.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:58 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:well yeah no shit of course youd rather go home at 3 pm. come to think of it id most want to just win the lottery than work.
Hey, dude, you're the one who called that guy's life your "dream." Anyway, the 7-7 dude clearly has it better than many in big law, I'll grant you that. It just doesn't seem ideal. My life sucks but I'm still at work fewer than 12 hours a day for most days of the year. And I get a market bonus.

Nekrowizard

Bronze
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:53 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Nekrowizard » Thu Oct 22, 2015 6:12 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:well yeah no shit of course youd rather go home at 3 pm. come to think of it id most want to just win the lottery than work.
It seems like the guy forewent 200K to dick around at work for 6 hours a day for 8 years (doing fun office activities? Shitposting on TLS?).

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Old Gregg » Thu Oct 22, 2015 6:15 pm

dixiecupdrinking wrote:
JohannDeMann wrote:billing 1700 to keep getting promoted? if you're a partner's right hand it probably means you aren't doing much grunt work but concerned with the strategy stuff etc. 7-7 at the office with a few hours of dicking around seems credited to me. pulled in a million after 5 years without bonus. what's not to love? you could easily have a family on that lifestyle and still retire at age 45/50 if you wanted to.
How about working the same hours, billing more, getting bonuses, and having an actual post-biglaw career?
keep in mind, the chances of you actually having a career in biglaw beyond year 8 by doing this only increase by maybe 1%.

BlackAndOrange84

Bronze
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:06 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BlackAndOrange84 » Fri Oct 23, 2015 12:06 pm

As a long-time lurker, I for one am sorely disappointed by the petering out of this thread.

Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Oct 23, 2015 2:30 pm

When STB raised salaries from 145 to 160, they did it in January, shortly after bonus season. When NY salaries go up, it'll probably be after the holiday season. January is the best time to raise salaries because lateral hiring usually freezes until bonuses get paid out, but as soon as bonus checks cash, tons of associates jump ship.

That in mind, I wonder what 2015 Christmas/Holiday bonuses will look like. They were up last year--you have to imagine they'll be up again this year as firms have continued to do very well.

User avatar
Byakuya769

New
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Byakuya769 » Fri Oct 23, 2015 3:32 pm

BlackAndOrange84 wrote:As a long-time lurker, I for one am sorely disappointed by the petering out of this thread.

Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?
Most posts were flames, now that it looks as a foregone conclusion, a lot of the flamers are talking to recruiters right now.

FSK

Platinum
Posts: 8058
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by FSK » Fri Oct 23, 2015 3:33 pm

Old Gregg wrote:
dixiecupdrinking wrote:
JohannDeMann wrote:billing 1700 to keep getting promoted? if you're a partner's right hand it probably means you aren't doing much grunt work but concerned with the strategy stuff etc. 7-7 at the office with a few hours of dicking around seems credited to me. pulled in a million after 5 years without bonus. what's not to love? you could easily have a family on that lifestyle and still retire at age 45/50 if you wanted to.
How about working the same hours, billing more, getting bonuses, and having an actual post-biglaw career?
keep in mind, the chances of you actually having a career in biglaw beyond year 8 by doing this only increase by maybe 1%.
1% * BOATLOADS of Cash made during a 20 year tenure as equity party = A SOLID EXPECTED VALUE CHOICE. Just do the math, bruh. You're throwing cash away otherwise.
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Fri Oct 23, 2015 3:39 pm

Anonymous User wrote:When STB raised salaries from 145 to 160, they did it in January, shortly after bonus season. When NY salaries go up, it'll probably be after the holiday season. January is the best time to raise salaries because lateral hiring usually freezes until bonuses get paid out, but as soon as bonus checks cash, tons of associates jump ship.

That in mind, I wonder what 2015 Christmas/Holiday bonuses will look like. They were up last year--you have to imagine they'll be up again this year as firms have continued to do very well.
bonuses will probably be about the same and salaries are going up is what its looking like. bonuses should be dope if firms arent matching or salaries dont go up. either way, total comp is going up by a decent margin.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
NoBladesNoBows

Silver
Posts: 1157
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 7:39 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by NoBladesNoBows » Fri Oct 23, 2015 3:42 pm

Last edited by NoBladesNoBows on Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Traynor Brah

Silver
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Traynor Brah » Fri Oct 23, 2015 3:52 pm

NoBladesNoBows wrote:Wait has 190k actually been confirmed beyond supposed-STB doc/their response, or has this thread just been so effective that we're taking 190k as a given now?
both

umichman

Bronze
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:56 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by umichman » Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:33 pm

Incoming summer at high ranking big law. They have made no mention of what the salary is in the offer letter nor any subsequent communication. Pretty sure they are waiting so that they can tell use the pay is 3600/wk

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Old Gregg » Fri Oct 23, 2015 6:19 pm

umichman wrote:Incoming summer at high ranking big law. They have made no mention of what the salary is in the offer letter nor any subsequent communication. Pretty sure they are waiting so that they can tell use the pay is 3600/wk
this has always been the case.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Br3v

Gold
Posts: 4290
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Br3v » Fri Oct 23, 2015 6:29 pm

Old Gregg wrote:
umichman wrote:Incoming summer at high ranking big law. They have made no mention of what the salary is in the offer letter nor any subsequent communication. Pretty sure they are waiting so that they can tell use the pay is 3600/wk
this has always been the case.
Man people have always been getting paid at 190 rate? I missed out.

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by fats provolone » Fri Oct 23, 2015 7:52 pm

Br3v wrote:
Old Gregg wrote:
umichman wrote:Incoming summer at high ranking big law. They have made no mention of what the salary is in the offer letter nor any subsequent communication. Pretty sure they are waiting so that they can tell use the pay is 3600/wk
this has always been the case.
Man people have always been getting paid at 190 rate? I missed out.
190 was confirmed a long time ago. you should sue for back pay.

dixiecupdrinking

Gold
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by dixiecupdrinking » Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:41 pm

Old Gregg wrote:
umichman wrote:Incoming summer at high ranking big law. They have made no mention of what the salary is in the offer letter nor any subsequent communication. Pretty sure they are waiting so that they can tell use the pay is 3600/wk
this has always been the case.
Shut up, GREGG

anonnymouse

Bronze
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by anonnymouse » Sat Oct 24, 2015 7:43 pm

BlackAndOrange84 wrote:As a long-time lurker, I for one am sorely disappointed by the petering out of this thread.

Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?
Neither actually. Some of us who have in-the-know contacts have gotten together to vet a second document that has surfaced. Different template/format than STB and I won't hint at who until we've fully vetted but safe to say it looks like there will for sure be comp stratification among firms.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:47 pm

What kind of V range are we talking about for this new document? Can you give us that?

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by smaug » Sat Oct 24, 2015 9:08 pm

Anonymous User wrote:What kind of V range are we talking about for this new document? Can you give us that?
are you worried your tiny pink firm won't match or something?

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Old Gregg » Sun Oct 25, 2015 1:20 am

anonnymouse wrote:
BlackAndOrange84 wrote:As a long-time lurker, I for one am sorely disappointed by the petering out of this thread.

Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?
Neither actually. Some of us who have in-the-know contacts have gotten together to vet a second document that has surfaced. Different template/format than STB and I won't hint at who until we've fully vetted but safe to say it looks like there will for sure be comp stratification among firms.
love it!

anonnymouse

Bronze
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by anonnymouse » Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:35 am

Old Gregg wrote:
anonnymouse wrote:
BlackAndOrange84 wrote:As a long-time lurker, I for one am sorely disappointed by the petering out of this thread.

Did the ATL article take all the wind out of our sails ITT, or is NY to 190 such a fait accompli that it's no longer necessary to fan the flames?
Neither actually. Some of us who have in-the-know contacts have gotten together to vet a second document that has surfaced. Different template/format than STB and I won't hint at who until we've fully vetted but safe to say it looks like there will for sure be comp stratification among firms.
love it!
OG I know you are on board with this. Think how IRATE Johannn will be when his all-in comp bumps his PAYE payments above what his SoFi refi payments would have been!!!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


anonnymouse

Bronze
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by anonnymouse » Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:38 am

Anonymous User wrote:What kind of V range are we talking about for this new document? Can you give us that?
Not willing to disclose any further info until this new doc is fully vetted. We are having to work slowly and discreetly. Sorry.

User avatar
Br3v

Gold
Posts: 4290
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Br3v » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:17 am

Firm hasn't set salary yet, but said that last year's incoming salary was "160,000."

Not sure what to think of it but I would say it's more than a subtle hint that a 6 is an upside down 9.

Anyone else's firm say this?

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Old Gregg » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:39 am

Br3v wrote:Firm hasn't set salary yet, but said that last year's incoming salary was "160,000."

Not sure what to think of it but I would say it's more than a subtle hint that a 6 is an upside down 9.

Anyone else's firm say this?
everyone's firm says this.

Traynor Brah

Silver
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Traynor Brah » Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:16 pm

dixiecupdrinking wrote: Shut up, GREGG

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”