NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:06 am

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:41 am, edited 2 times in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Oct 22, 2015 3:22 am

Desert Fox wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
Glasseyes wrote:Pretty sure Cadwalader has no min billables and lockstep, or they did for the DC office. NY is undoubtedly just as deadly as any other firm (or worse), though the associates in DC do seem to bill 1750-1850 pretty consistently. If they actually get the lockstep bonus, that sounds like a bearable life.
LJL. Uh, no.
Their bonus memo last year said "qualified Counsel, Special Counsel and Associates." I bet that means some hours minimum.

I'd believe some Cad DC bros were hanging on at 1750. I can't believe they'd give them 100k bonus for only billing that low.
were they managing matters like partners? If so I think that justifies paying them 100k bonus.

User avatar
TLSModBot

Diamond
Posts: 14835
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by TLSModBot » Thu Oct 22, 2015 7:26 am

Nekrowizard wrote:Ah, but you see, there's only ONE (1) T14 school in those places. Of course they won't match.
Wait DC has only one T14 (and barely one at that). DC HEADED TO SECONDARY MARKET STATUS

NoLongerALurker

Bronze
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 2:08 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by NoLongerALurker » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:31 am

DC has the Supreme Court. We all know that adds a value of 1.5 T14's to the local legal preftige. DC constructively has 2 elite schools. Primary market status confirmed.

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:10 pm

ive missed the last 5 pages or so of this but this is actually all according to plan - not sure if anyone posited this yet

no firm wants to go to 190 and only have 10-15 firms match it and no one else even try to move off 160.

simpson clearly leaked that on purpose to feel the market response out. looks like firms are deciding between 175 and 190 if i had to guess. also, the only people that would get that memo are boomer and not sending anything to ATL. but based on simpson's response, it's clear the document is real and theirs.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Cobretti

Gold
Posts: 2593
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Cobretti » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:17 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:ive missed the last 5 pages or so of this but this is actually all according to plan - not sure if anyone posited this yet

no firm wants to go to 190 and only have 10-15 firms match it and no one else even try to move off 160.

simpson clearly leaked that on purpose to feel the market response out. looks like firms are deciding between 175 and 190 if i had to guess. also, the only people that would get that memo are boomer and not sending anything to ATL. but based on simpson's response, it's clear the document is real and theirs.
Shouldn't they prefer that only 10-15 firms match?

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by smaug » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:21 pm

Cobretti wrote:
JohannDeMann wrote:ive missed the last 5 pages or so of this but this is actually all according to plan - not sure if anyone posited this yet

no firm wants to go to 190 and only have 10-15 firms match it and no one else even try to move off 160.

simpson clearly leaked that on purpose to feel the market response out. looks like firms are deciding between 175 and 190 if i had to guess. also, the only people that would get that memo are boomer and not sending anything to ATL. but based on simpson's response, it's clear the document is real and theirs.
Shouldn't they prefer that only 10-15 firms match?
It's not about differentiation, it's about lowering partner comp at other shops, causing partner departures and killing that firm entirely, obvi

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:24 pm

Cobretti wrote:
JohannDeMann wrote:ive missed the last 5 pages or so of this but this is actually all according to plan - not sure if anyone posited this yet

no firm wants to go to 190 and only have 10-15 firms match it and no one else even try to move off 160.

simpson clearly leaked that on purpose to feel the market response out. looks like firms are deciding between 175 and 190 if i had to guess. also, the only people that would get that memo are boomer and not sending anything to ATL. but based on simpson's response, it's clear the document is real and theirs.
Shouldn't they prefer that only 10-15 firms match?
yeah but why go to 190 if you can go to 175. they want to know if firms paying 160k will move to 175 thats the key question. they already know firms cant go to 190.

User avatar
Single-Malt-Liquor

Silver
Posts: 1450
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Single-Malt-Liquor » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:29 pm

It's 190 or bust. Going to 175 when the market is 190 is like going to bed with a half chub. No one's doing shit with that so you might as well keep it in your pants.

NYC to Full Chub!

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:32 pm

My v42 is going to 175k but midlevels are getting a 60k bump.

PMan99

Bronze
Posts: 349
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:21 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by PMan99 » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:34 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
Glasseyes wrote:Pretty sure Cadwalader has no min billables and lockstep, or they did for the DC office. NY is undoubtedly just as deadly as any other firm (or worse), though the associates in DC do seem to bill 1750-1850 pretty consistently. If they actually get the lockstep bonus, that sounds like a bearable life.
LJL. Uh, no.
Their bonus memo last year said "qualified Counsel, Special Counsel and Associates." I bet that means some hours minimum.

I'd believe some Cad DC bros were hanging on at 1750. I can't believe they'd give them 100k bonus for only billing that low.
Yes. I think TLS underestimates, particularly for non-NY offices, the number of people coming in marginally below 2000. It doesn't mean your life is good for a variety of reasons, and in many ways the 1900 area is worse than the 2100 area. TLS also underestimates the shenanigans that firms, from the top of Vault on down, routinely pull to lower associate compensation (no/partial bonus even if they hit hours, no class year advancement, etc.).

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:48 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:41 am, edited 2 times in total.

gaddockteeg

Bronze
Posts: 439
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:33 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by gaddockteeg » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:54 pm

Capitol_Idea wrote:
Nekrowizard wrote:Ah, but you see, there's only ONE (1) T14 school in those places. Of course they won't match.
Wait DC has only one T14 (and barely one at that). DC HEADED TO SECONDARY MARKET STATUS
I think UVA counts as DC.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
baal hadad

Gold
Posts: 3167
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by baal hadad » Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:46 pm

Desert Fox wrote:I knew a guy who billed 1700 a year at my firm from like 2006-2014. That includes pro bono. Was well respected. However, he was in the office 7am to 7pm as his partners right hand man. He also never once got bonus.
Sounds awful

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:54 pm

So if when firms go to 190, what do firms that pay under market in NYC do?

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Thu Oct 22, 2015 3:00 pm

Anonymous User wrote:So if when firms go to 190, what do firms that pay under market in NYC do?
That's not really relevant now, is it?

JustHawkin

Gold
Posts: 1798
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by JustHawkin » Thu Oct 22, 2015 3:03 pm

rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:So if when firms go to 190, what do firms that pay under market in NYC do?
That's not really relevant now, is it?
I mean, it would be relevant if the firm you're summering at pays under market?

Asking for a friend.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
baal hadad

Gold
Posts: 3167
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by baal hadad » Thu Oct 22, 2015 3:12 pm

Anonymous User wrote:My v42 is going to 175k but midlevels are getting a 60k bump.
I bet everyone is ENJOYING it har har

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:19 pm

Desert Fox wrote:I knew a guy who billed 1700 a year at my firm from like 2006-2014. That includes pro bono. Was well respected. However, he was in the office 7am to 7pm as his partners right hand man. He also never once got bonus.
this guy is a god to me. that's the dream right there (imo).

User avatar
baal hadad

Gold
Posts: 3167
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by baal hadad » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:20 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:I knew a guy who billed 1700 a year at my firm from like 2006-2014. That includes pro bono. Was well respected. However, he was in the office 7am to 7pm as his partners right hand man. He also never once got bonus.
this guy is a god to me. that's the dream right there (imo).
Why?

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:22 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:I knew a guy who billed 1700 a year at my firm from like 2006-2014. That includes pro bono. Was well respected. However, he was in the office 7am to 7pm as his partners right hand man. He also never once got bonus.
this guy is a god to me. that's the dream right there (imo).
So your dream is billing at a 50% efficiency rate, never receiving a bonus, and getting forced out after your eighth year?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:26 pm

billing 1700 to keep getting promoted? if you're a partner's right hand it probably means you aren't doing much grunt work but concerned with the strategy stuff etc. 7-7 at the office with a few hours of dicking around seems credited to me. pulled in a million after 5 years without bonus. what's not to love? you could easily have a family on that lifestyle and still retire at age 45/50 if you wanted to.

dixiecupdrinking

Gold
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by dixiecupdrinking » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:40 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:billing 1700 to keep getting promoted? if you're a partner's right hand it probably means you aren't doing much grunt work but concerned with the strategy stuff etc. 7-7 at the office with a few hours of dicking around seems credited to me. pulled in a million after 5 years without bonus. what's not to love? you could easily have a family on that lifestyle and still retire at age 45/50 if you wanted to.
How about working the same hours, billing more, getting bonuses, and having an actual post-biglaw career?

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Johann » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:42 pm

i mean the whole point it is awesome because he is dicking around 6 hours a day.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:47 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:i mean the whole point it is awesome because he is dicking around 6 hours a day.
As much as I enjoy dicking around (see, e.g., my dozens of posts in this thread), I think that, if I were only billing 6 hours a day, I'd prefer to go home at 3 p.m. instead of waiting around for my partner master to give me work.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”