
NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Desert Fox

- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
were they managing matters like partners? If so I think that justifies paying them 100k bonus.Desert Fox wrote:Their bonus memo last year said "qualified Counsel, Special Counsel and Associates." I bet that means some hours minimum.rpupkin wrote:LJL. Uh, no.Glasseyes wrote:Pretty sure Cadwalader has no min billables and lockstep, or they did for the DC office. NY is undoubtedly just as deadly as any other firm (or worse), though the associates in DC do seem to bill 1750-1850 pretty consistently. If they actually get the lockstep bonus, that sounds like a bearable life.
I'd believe some Cad DC bros were hanging on at 1750. I can't believe they'd give them 100k bonus for only billing that low.
- TLSModBot

- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Wait DC has only one T14 (and barely one at that). DC HEADED TO SECONDARY MARKET STATUSNekrowizard wrote:Ah, but you see, there's only ONE (1) T14 school in those places. Of course they won't match.
-
NoLongerALurker

- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 2:08 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
DC has the Supreme Court. We all know that adds a value of 1.5 T14's to the local legal preftige. DC constructively has 2 elite schools. Primary market status confirmed.
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
ive missed the last 5 pages or so of this but this is actually all according to plan - not sure if anyone posited this yet
no firm wants to go to 190 and only have 10-15 firms match it and no one else even try to move off 160.
simpson clearly leaked that on purpose to feel the market response out. looks like firms are deciding between 175 and 190 if i had to guess. also, the only people that would get that memo are boomer and not sending anything to ATL. but based on simpson's response, it's clear the document is real and theirs.
no firm wants to go to 190 and only have 10-15 firms match it and no one else even try to move off 160.
simpson clearly leaked that on purpose to feel the market response out. looks like firms are deciding between 175 and 190 if i had to guess. also, the only people that would get that memo are boomer and not sending anything to ATL. but based on simpson's response, it's clear the document is real and theirs.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Cobretti

- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Shouldn't they prefer that only 10-15 firms match?JohannDeMann wrote:ive missed the last 5 pages or so of this but this is actually all according to plan - not sure if anyone posited this yet
no firm wants to go to 190 and only have 10-15 firms match it and no one else even try to move off 160.
simpson clearly leaked that on purpose to feel the market response out. looks like firms are deciding between 175 and 190 if i had to guess. also, the only people that would get that memo are boomer and not sending anything to ATL. but based on simpson's response, it's clear the document is real and theirs.
- smaug

- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
It's not about differentiation, it's about lowering partner comp at other shops, causing partner departures and killing that firm entirely, obviCobretti wrote:Shouldn't they prefer that only 10-15 firms match?JohannDeMann wrote:ive missed the last 5 pages or so of this but this is actually all according to plan - not sure if anyone posited this yet
no firm wants to go to 190 and only have 10-15 firms match it and no one else even try to move off 160.
simpson clearly leaked that on purpose to feel the market response out. looks like firms are deciding between 175 and 190 if i had to guess. also, the only people that would get that memo are boomer and not sending anything to ATL. but based on simpson's response, it's clear the document is real and theirs.
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
yeah but why go to 190 if you can go to 175. they want to know if firms paying 160k will move to 175 thats the key question. they already know firms cant go to 190.Cobretti wrote:Shouldn't they prefer that only 10-15 firms match?JohannDeMann wrote:ive missed the last 5 pages or so of this but this is actually all according to plan - not sure if anyone posited this yet
no firm wants to go to 190 and only have 10-15 firms match it and no one else even try to move off 160.
simpson clearly leaked that on purpose to feel the market response out. looks like firms are deciding between 175 and 190 if i had to guess. also, the only people that would get that memo are boomer and not sending anything to ATL. but based on simpson's response, it's clear the document is real and theirs.
- Single-Malt-Liquor

- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
It's 190 or bust. Going to 175 when the market is 190 is like going to bed with a half chub. No one's doing shit with that so you might as well keep it in your pants.
NYC to Full Chub!
NYC to Full Chub!
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
My v42 is going to 175k but midlevels are getting a 60k bump.
-
PMan99

- Posts: 349
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Yes. I think TLS underestimates, particularly for non-NY offices, the number of people coming in marginally below 2000. It doesn't mean your life is good for a variety of reasons, and in many ways the 1900 area is worse than the 2100 area. TLS also underestimates the shenanigans that firms, from the top of Vault on down, routinely pull to lower associate compensation (no/partial bonus even if they hit hours, no class year advancement, etc.).Desert Fox wrote:Their bonus memo last year said "qualified Counsel, Special Counsel and Associates." I bet that means some hours minimum.rpupkin wrote:LJL. Uh, no.Glasseyes wrote:Pretty sure Cadwalader has no min billables and lockstep, or they did for the DC office. NY is undoubtedly just as deadly as any other firm (or worse), though the associates in DC do seem to bill 1750-1850 pretty consistently. If they actually get the lockstep bonus, that sounds like a bearable life.
I'd believe some Cad DC bros were hanging on at 1750. I can't believe they'd give them 100k bonus for only billing that low.
- Desert Fox

- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
-
gaddockteeg

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:33 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I think UVA counts as DC.Capitol_Idea wrote:Wait DC has only one T14 (and barely one at that). DC HEADED TO SECONDARY MARKET STATUSNekrowizard wrote:Ah, but you see, there's only ONE (1) T14 school in those places. Of course they won't match.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- baal hadad

- Posts: 3167
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Sounds awfulDesert Fox wrote:I knew a guy who billed 1700 a year at my firm from like 2006-2014. That includes pro bono. Was well respected. However, he was in the office 7am to 7pm as his partners right hand man. He also never once got bonus.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
So if when firms go to 190, what do firms that pay under market in NYC do?
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
That's not really relevant now, is it?Anonymous User wrote:Soifwhen firms go to 190, what do firms that pay under market in NYC do?
-
JustHawkin

- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I mean, it would be relevant if the firm you're summering at pays under market?rpupkin wrote:That's not really relevant now, is it?Anonymous User wrote:Soifwhen firms go to 190, what do firms that pay under market in NYC do?
Asking for a friend.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- baal hadad

- Posts: 3167
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I bet everyone is ENJOYING it har harAnonymous User wrote:My v42 is going to 175k but midlevels are getting a 60k bump.
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
this guy is a god to me. that's the dream right there (imo).Desert Fox wrote:I knew a guy who billed 1700 a year at my firm from like 2006-2014. That includes pro bono. Was well respected. However, he was in the office 7am to 7pm as his partners right hand man. He also never once got bonus.
- baal hadad

- Posts: 3167
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Why?JohannDeMann wrote:this guy is a god to me. that's the dream right there (imo).Desert Fox wrote:I knew a guy who billed 1700 a year at my firm from like 2006-2014. That includes pro bono. Was well respected. However, he was in the office 7am to 7pm as his partners right hand man. He also never once got bonus.
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
So your dream is billing at a 50% efficiency rate, never receiving a bonus, and getting forced out after your eighth year?JohannDeMann wrote:this guy is a god to me. that's the dream right there (imo).Desert Fox wrote:I knew a guy who billed 1700 a year at my firm from like 2006-2014. That includes pro bono. Was well respected. However, he was in the office 7am to 7pm as his partners right hand man. He also never once got bonus.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
billing 1700 to keep getting promoted? if you're a partner's right hand it probably means you aren't doing much grunt work but concerned with the strategy stuff etc. 7-7 at the office with a few hours of dicking around seems credited to me. pulled in a million after 5 years without bonus. what's not to love? you could easily have a family on that lifestyle and still retire at age 45/50 if you wanted to.
-
dixiecupdrinking

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
How about working the same hours, billing more, getting bonuses, and having an actual post-biglaw career?JohannDeMann wrote:billing 1700 to keep getting promoted? if you're a partner's right hand it probably means you aren't doing much grunt work but concerned with the strategy stuff etc. 7-7 at the office with a few hours of dicking around seems credited to me. pulled in a million after 5 years without bonus. what's not to love? you could easily have a family on that lifestyle and still retire at age 45/50 if you wanted to.
- Johann

- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
i mean the whole point it is awesome because he is dicking around 6 hours a day.
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
As much as I enjoy dicking around (see, e.g., my dozens of posts in this thread), I think that, if I were only billing 6 hours a day, I'd prefer to go home at 3 p.m. instead of waiting around for my partner master to give me work.JohannDeMann wrote:i mean the whole point it is awesome because he is dicking around 6 hours a day.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login