OCI/callbacks/etc Men's Clothing Mega-thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Pufer
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:32 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Not counting the 300-400 cheap ties I bought in bulk off from thrift stores and eBay to turn into a Halloween costume ("all tied up: a walking pun").
-Pufer
-Pufer
- GodSpeed
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:05 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
wow. I have like 50. lol
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Anything more than that just seems unnecessary.GodSpeed wrote:wow. I have like 50. lol
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
WTF is the point of having hundreds of ties? That's fucking retarded.
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
C'mon. Anyone who wears the same tie twice within 2 1/2 years is just TTT.romothesavior wrote:WTF is the point of having hundreds of ties? That's fucking retarded.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- leobowski
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:11 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I stopped buying thrift stores ties when I realized that a used tie + dry cleaning costs= more than a tie @ TJ Maxx.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I think most partners send people home if they wear the same tie in the same year. Or they humiliate them in public and ask restaurant waitstaff if they meet dress requirements. After all, few respectable restaurants would allow patrons to wear ties from the Brooks Brothers Fall 2009 catalogue in July of 2010.seespotrun wrote:C'mon. Anyone who wears the same tie twice within 2 1/2 years is just TTT.romothesavior wrote:WTF is the point of having hundreds of ties? That's fucking retarded.
- TCScrutinizer
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:01 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Damn I own three ties.
At this rate I'm going to have to buy about $30,000 worth of clothing before OCI.
At this rate I'm going to have to buy about $30,000 worth of clothing before OCI.
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Brooks Brothers...ew.romothesavior wrote:I think most partners send people home if they wear the same tie in the same year. Or they humiliate them in public and ask restaurant waitstaff if they meet dress requirements. After all, few respectable restaurants would allow patrons to wear ties from the Brooks Brothers Fall 2009 catalogue in July of 2010.seespotrun wrote:C'mon. Anyone who wears the same tie twice within 2 1/2 years is just TTT.romothesavior wrote:WTF is the point of having hundreds of ties? That's fucking retarded.
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
That will buy you half of a suit.TCScrutinizer wrote:Damn I own three ties.
At this rate I'm going to have to buy about $30,000 worth of clothing before OCI.
- Bosque
- Posts: 1672
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:14 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
You need exactly one tie for OCI. Two if you get callbacks. Three so that you can wear a different one on your first day of work before you buy some more with your advance/bonus.TCScrutinizer wrote:Damn I own three ties.
At this rate I'm going to have to buy about $30,000 worth of clothing before OCI.
So you are good. Provided they are good ties of course.
- Pufer
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:32 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Mostly I just collect them (tie hand woven by a Navajo guy, bunch of hand-painted ties from the 40s, tie with power symbols on it, etc.). My actual rotation is more like 120 ties; 200-250 including various situational ties.romothesavior wrote:WTF is the point of having hundreds of ties? That's fucking retarded.
Probably has something to do with spending a couple years of my childhood on the move, always on the verge of homelessness, having virtually nothing but whatever clothing I had on my back. When you spend a couple winters wearing a single, inadequate jacket that outgrew you a couple years back (that you found on the side of the road to begin with), as soon as you get some cash, you buy like thirty jackets so you never have to go through that shit again (you also put in some effort learning how to dress, so that you're never mistaken for "that homeless kid" again).
Yeah, maybe it is "fucking retarded," but I still just feel better if I have more than enough clothing (and blankets, and food in my pantry).
-Pufer
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Sometimes I wonder whether or not you're an elaborate flame.Pufer wrote:Mostly I just collect them (tie hand woven by a Navajo guy, bunch of hand-painted ties from the 40s, tie with power symbols on it, etc.). My actual rotation is more like 120 ties; 200-250 including various situational ties.romothesavior wrote:WTF is the point of having hundreds of ties? That's fucking retarded.
Probably has something to do with spending a couple years of my childhood on the move, always on the verge of homelessness, having virtually nothing but whatever clothing I had on my back. When you spend a couple winters wearing a single, inadequate jacket that outgrew you a couple years back (that you found on the side of the road to begin with), as soon as you get some cash, you buy like thirty jackets so you never have to go through that shit again (you also put in some effort learning how to dress, so that you're never mistaken for "that homeless kid" again).
Yeah, maybe it is "fucking retarded," but I still just feel better if I have more than enough clothing (and blankets, and food in my pantry).
-Pufer
-seespotrun
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Waterman47
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Regardless of the reasoning, having 800 ties seems like an absolute nightmare.
Right now I'm wearing a tie daily and I don't see a need to have more than 10 or 15, if that. 50 seems excessive, 800 just seems... I don't even know the word.
Right now I'm wearing a tie daily and I don't see a need to have more than 10 or 15, if that. 50 seems excessive, 800 just seems... I don't even know the word.
+1Sometimes I wonder whether or not you're an elaborate flame.
I don't know what's worse, this sort of attitude or the guy that was saying he'd wear loafers to an interview. It's admirable to be knowledgable about fashion, or anything else, but when you take it to this extreme you just seem like a douche. It's a freakin' button-down collar. Get over it.A decent enough reason to not wear the button-down to the office is that I would give you incessant shit about it as a fellow associate. Any time we go to the courthouse, asking you whether you'd like to get dressed first; asking waitstaff in restaurants whether you meet the dress code at lunch; bringing new paralegals into your office to show them what not to wear; and so on. I'd be doing it just to give you a hard time, but why would you want to give me that opportunity?
- wolfpack-avvocato
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:38 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Oh man you're going to catch soooooo much shit on these boards for being a dick to Pufer. How he's not a Legendary Poster yet, I have no idea.seespotrun wrote:Sometimes I wonder whether or not you're an elaborate flame.Pufer wrote:Mostly I just collect them (tie hand woven by a Navajo guy, bunch of hand-painted ties from the 40s, tie with power symbols on it, etc.). My actual rotation is more like 120 ties; 200-250 including various situational ties.romothesavior wrote:WTF is the point of having hundreds of ties? That's fucking retarded.
Probably has something to do with spending a couple years of my childhood on the move, always on the verge of homelessness, having virtually nothing but whatever clothing I had on my back. When you spend a couple winters wearing a single, inadequate jacket that outgrew you a couple years back (that you found on the side of the road to begin with), as soon as you get some cash, you buy like thirty jackets so you never have to go through that shit again (you also put in some effort learning how to dress, so that you're never mistaken for "that homeless kid" again).
Yeah, maybe it is "fucking retarded," but I still just feel better if I have more than enough clothing (and blankets, and food in my pantry).
-Pufer
-seespotrun
- Stanford4Me
- Posts: 6240
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:23 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Shut up and suck it.seespotrun wrote:
Sometimes I wonder whether or not you're an elaborate flame.
-seespotrun
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Amen. That diatribe about giving people crap for wearing button-downs was one of the most absurd things I've read in a while. Absolutely douche-tastic in every way.Waterman47 wrote:I don't know what's worse, this sort of attitude or the guy that was saying he'd wear loafers to an interview. It's admirable to be knowledgable about fashion, or anything else, but when you take it to this extreme you just seem like a douche. It's a freakin' button-down collar. Get over it.A decent enough reason to not wear the button-down to the office is that I would give you incessant shit about it as a fellow associate. Any time we go to the courthouse, asking you whether you'd like to get dressed first; asking waitstaff in restaurants whether you meet the dress code at lunch; bringing new paralegals into your office to show them what not to wear; and so on. I'd be doing it just to give you a hard time, but why would you want to give me that opportunity?
-romothesavior
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Duralex
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:25 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
FWIW, I didn't actually suggest wearing loafers to an interview, I said tasseled and kiltied loafers are acceptable with suits as office attire, and are in fact commonly identified with lawyers. I mentioned that I see older partners wearing them with regularity. The only thing I said about loafers re: interviews is that I'd be amazed it they lost you a position. Not that I want to have that argument again. Ever. Most people here clearly disagree, strongly. But if I'm to be hanged, let it be for what I actually said.Waterman47 wrote: I don't know what's worse, this sort of attitude or the guy that was saying he'd wear loafers to an interview. It's admirable to be knowledgable about fashion, or anything else, but when you take it to this extreme you just seem like a douche. It's a freakin' button-down collar. Get over it.
Also FWIW, button downs are perennial points of debate. Avoid them if you're worried about it, I guess.
While I might not agree with all of Pufer's views, the man is clearly knowledgeable. I absolutely agree when it comes to having more than you need. Also, lots of ties (or shirts of whatever does it for you in terms of the personal touch you prefer) is a noble vice. And ties go through fashion cycles, too, so you can throw 'em in a box and dig em out again much easier than you can with a suit collection. I'm not sure if anyone has 800 ties out on a rack (although that would be kinda cool. You'd need an organization system out of High Fidelity....)
Last edited by Duralex on Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
- TCScrutinizer
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:01 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Awesome. I feel so much better about my nipple ring collection now.Duralex wrote:FWIW, I didn't actually suggest wearing loafers to an interview, I said tasseled and kiltied loafers are acceptable with suits as office attire, and are in fact commonly identified with lawyers. I mentioned that I see older partners wearing them with regularity. The only thing I said about loafers re: interviews is that I'd be amazed it they lost you a position. Not that I want to have that argument again. Ever. Most people here clearly disagree, strongly. But if I'm to be hanged, let it be for what I actually said.Waterman47 wrote: I don't know what's worse, this sort of attitude or the guy that was saying he'd wear loafers to an interview. It's admirable to be knowledgable about fashion, or anything else, but when you take it to this extreme you just seem like a douche. It's a freakin' button-down collar. Get over it.
Also FWIW, button downs are perennial points of debate. Avoid them if you're worried about it, I guess.
While I might not agree with all of Pufer's views, the man is clearly knowledgeable. I absolutely agree when it comes to having more than you need. Also, lots of ties (or shirts of whatever does it for you in terms of the personal touch you prefer) is a noble vice.
- Duralex
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:25 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
But which nipple ring is interview appropriate? This is truly a subtle art.
- Waterman47
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
If for no other reason, I would never wear a shoe that is called "tasseled and kiltied."
And I'm the complete opposite in terms of clothes hording; having too much makes me feel weighed down. Every 6 months or so I go through my closet and give anything I haven't worn in the previous half-year to Goodwill (other than seasonal stuff or situational clothing like a tux). I've never went back to my closet and felt that I was missing something I needed.
And I'm the complete opposite in terms of clothes hording; having too much makes me feel weighed down. Every 6 months or so I go through my closet and give anything I haven't worn in the previous half-year to Goodwill (other than seasonal stuff or situational clothing like a tux). I've never went back to my closet and felt that I was missing something I needed.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TCScrutinizer
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:01 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
For showing the V10 you mesh with their values:Duralex wrote:But which nipple ring is interview appropriate? This is truly a subtle art.
http://www.bodycandy.com/cgi-bin/item/24866
A nice pearl drop for the conservative firm:
http://www.bodycandy.com/cgi-bin/item/23541
For those few interested in Maritime Law:
http://www.bodycandy.com/cgi-bin/item/24874
The possibilities are endless. These are from a cheap website, of course. I'm sure if you check at Cartier or Tiffany they'll have something to really impress the more discerning hiring partners.
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I don't think that my post rose to the level of "being a dick," but opinions may vary in that regard. I appreciate that Pufer only posts helpful information, but I have honestly wondered whether or not he was some more regular poster's alt. more than once.wolfpack-avvocato wrote:Oh man you're going to catch soooooo much shit on these boards for being a dick to Pufer. How he's not a Legendary Poster yet, I have no idea.seespotrun wrote:Sometimes I wonder whether or not you're an elaborate flame.Pufer wrote:Mostly I just collect them (tie hand woven by a Navajo guy, bunch of hand-painted ties from the 40s, tie with power symbols on it, etc.). My actual rotation is more like 120 ties; 200-250 including various situational ties.romothesavior wrote:WTF is the point of having hundreds of ties? That's fucking retarded.
Probably has something to do with spending a couple years of my childhood on the move, always on the verge of homelessness, having virtually nothing but whatever clothing I had on my back. When you spend a couple winters wearing a single, inadequate jacket that outgrew you a couple years back (that you found on the side of the road to begin with), as soon as you get some cash, you buy like thirty jackets so you never have to go through that shit again (you also put in some effort learning how to dress, so that you're never mistaken for "that homeless kid" again).
Yeah, maybe it is "fucking retarded," but I still just feel better if I have more than enough clothing (and blankets, and food in my pantry).
-Pufer
-seespotrun
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I'm with you on that. I own like 25 polos and I only wear about 12, so I think I'm going to drop off a bunch at the Goodwill before I move to STL. I can't remember the exact statistic, but I read some random article or survey (on Yahoo or something) that said people wear a pretty low percentage of their wardrobe each month, like under 50%.Waterman47 wrote:If for no other reason, I would never wear a shoe that is called "tasseled and kiltied."
And I'm the complete opposite in terms of clothes hording; having too much makes me feel weighed down. Every 6 months or so I go through my closet and give anything I haven't worn in the previous half-year to Goodwill (other than seasonal stuff or situational clothing like a tux). I've never went back to my closet and felt that I was missing something I needed.
A dozen shits and a dozen ties is plenty (maybe even overkill), and you can pair them all in different combinations to make it look like you have a pretty diverse wardrobe.
- GodSpeed
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:05 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
i prob have 12 shirts I wear rgularly and 25 tires. I wish I had 3 or 4 more shirts. I have 6 suits I wear regularly, wish I had 2 or 3 more.romothesavior wrote:I'm with you on that. I own like 25 polos and I only wear about 12, so I think I'm going to drop off a bunch at the Goodwill before I move to STL. I can't remember the exact statistic, but I read some random article or survey (on Yahoo or something) that said people wear a pretty low percentage of their wardrobe each month, like under 50%.Waterman47 wrote:If for no other reason, I would never wear a shoe that is called "tasseled and kiltied."
And I'm the complete opposite in terms of clothes hording; having too much makes me feel weighed down. Every 6 months or so I go through my closet and give anything I haven't worn in the previous half-year to Goodwill (other than seasonal stuff or situational clothing like a tux). I've never went back to my closet and felt that I was missing something I needed.
A dozen shits and a dozen ties is plenty (maybe even overkill), and you can pair them all in different combinations to make it look like you have a pretty diverse wardrobe.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login