NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Who will join the CovingTTTon list next?

WilmerHale
15
6%
Arnold & Porter
23
10%
Hogan Lovells
12
5%
Akin Gump
7
3%
Jones Day
114
47%
Jenner & Block
8
3%
Paul Hastings
7
3%
WachTTTell
23
10%
Other
7
3%
No one! YAY!
25
10%
 
Total votes: 241

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:21 pm

instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote: Don't mock me, bro. You're the one twisting yourself into logical contortions in order to rationalize your denial about LA's imminent secondary-market status. Silicon Beach? Really? And look at your list of law firms:

Latham: headquartered in NYC
O'Melveny: years of steady decline
MTO: not even V25
Irell: just lost all of its prestigious white collar attorneys
Gibson Dunn: flirts with V10 for years but keeps falling short; it's like UT with the T14.
Quinn Emanuel: LJL
I can't even... Until you have a shred of actual evidence that LA is "imminently" headed to "secondary-market status" (beyond your admittedly impressive ability to count T14 schools), I think I'll stick to "rationalizing my denial."
:cry:

Traynor Brah

Silver
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Traynor Brah » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:25 pm

instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote: LOL again. That's like saying no one wants to attend SLS or YLS because those schools have small class sizes.
Solid reasoning man...
Don't mock me, bro. You're the one twisting yourself into logical contortions in order to rationalize your denial about LA's imminent secondary-market status. Silicon Beach? Really? And look at your list of law firms:

Latham: headquartered in NYC
O'Melveny: years of steady decline
MTO: not even V25
Irell: just lost all of its prestigious white collar attorneys
Gibson Dunn: flirts with V10 for years but keeps falling short; it's like UT with the T14.
Quinn Emanuel: LJL
I can't even... Until you have a shred of actual evidence that LA is "imminently" headed to "secondary-market status" (beyond your admittedly impressive ability to count T14 schools), I think I'll stick to "rationalizing my denial."
Flame?

User avatar
052220152

Gold
Posts: 4798
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:24 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by 052220152 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:28 pm

guys i think we are getting a bit ahead of ourselves here. while LA is definitely sliding into secondary status due to their lack of t14s, i hardly doubt that ann arbor, durham, and new haven markets are going to bump up to 190 to match the other primaries. i could see them going to 160 with matching bonuses though.

Nekrowizard

Bronze
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:53 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Nekrowizard » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:29 pm

instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote: LOL again. That's like saying no one wants to attend SLS or YLS because those schools have small class sizes.
Solid reasoning man...
Don't mock me, bro. You're the one twisting yourself into logical contortions in order to rationalize your denial about LA's imminent secondary-market status. Silicon Beach? Really? And look at your list of law firms:

Latham: headquartered in NYC
O'Melveny: years of steady decline
MTO: not even V25
Irell: just lost all of its prestigious white collar attorneys
Gibson Dunn: flirts with V10 for years but keeps falling short; it's like UT with the T14.
Quinn Emanuel: LJL
I can't even... Until you have a shred of actual evidence that LA is "imminently" headed to "secondary-market status" (beyond your admittedly impressive ability to count T14 schools), I think I'll stick to "rationalizing my denial."
Please stop this egregious trolling.
Jim Jones wrote:guys i think we are getting a bit ahead of ourselves here. while LA is definitely sliding into secondary status due to their lack of t14s, i hardly doubt that ann arbor, durham, and new haven markets are going to bump up to 190 to match the other primaries. i could see them going to 160 with matching bonuses though.
Ah, but you see, there's only ONE (1) T14 school in those places. Of course they won't match.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by BigZuck » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:30 pm

I think this thread is really good and I like it very much

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:35 pm

horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
Proskauer.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432834
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:36 pm

Whoops

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:36 pm

after having spent the last 4 years in BIGLAW, i couldnt give a FUCK about law schools/rankings

accordingly, im going 2 use my EMERITUS status to request kindly an end to this stupid debate

hoos89

Gold
Posts: 2166
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by hoos89 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:36 pm

rpupkin wrote:
instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20.
LOL. Yes, both schools have solid regional reputations, like fellow T20 also-rans WUSTL and Minnesota. Have you checked out market salary in St. Louis and Minneapolis lately? That's where the LA market is heading, my friend.
LA to $115k

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:37 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
Proskauer.

GOOD 2 KNO

Traynor Brah

Silver
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Traynor Brah » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:38 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
Proskauer.
***peer firms

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:43 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:after having spent the last 4 years in BIGLAW, i couldnt give a FUCK about law schools/rankings

accordingly, im going 2 use my EMERITUS status to request kindly an end to this stupid debate
I call flame. No one with four years of experience in big law would write this:
Big Shrimpin wrote:
horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
this is actually a very interesting question

everybody stop talking about law schools (law school is sooo 3 years ago) and start talking about CREDITED places to work

Your request is denied and your emeritus status is under investigation.

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by fats provolone » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:46 pm

LA is going to 190 but the last 30 will be taxed at 100%

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Big Shrimpin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:47 pm

took the only path that presented itself, so considering whether a firm paid bonuses without billable minimums was not a an analysis that i had the luxury to undertake

last poast ITT anyway ;-)

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:55 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:took the only path that presented itself, so considering whether a firm paid bonuses without billable
Seriously, I think what DF wrote above is credited. A lack of a billable hour minimum (or a low billable hour minimum) is appealing in theory, but it makes little (if any) difference in practice.

horns12

New
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:02 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by horns12 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:04 pm

rpupkin wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:took the only path that presented itself, so considering whether a firm paid bonuses without billable
Seriously, I think what DF wrote above is credited. A lack of a billable hour minimum (or a low billable hour minimum) is appealing in theory, but it makes little (if any) difference in practice.
Let's you hang out in a chill practice group for a few years not worrying about hours, but probably doesn't affect too many people.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:09 pm

horns12 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:took the only path that presented itself, so considering whether a firm paid bonuses without billable
Seriously, I think what DF wrote above is credited. A lack of a billable hour minimum (or a low billable hour minimum) is appealing in theory, but it makes little (if any) difference in practice.
Let's you hang out in a chill practice group for a few years not worrying about hours, but probably doesn't affect too many people.
Once a firm ends up with "chill practice groups" with more than a handful of associates, the firm starts doing stuff like imposing minimum billable hour targets for bonuses. That's the thing: the firms that don't have minimums generally don't need them because almost all the associates are billing a ton anyway.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Lincoln

Silver
Posts: 1208
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:27 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Lincoln » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:15 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:
horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
this is actually a very interesting question

everybody stop talking about law schools (law school is sooo 3 years ago) and start talking about CREDITED places to work
Paul, Weiss, for one.
I feel like any place with no minimum for bonus is the sort of place where peer pressure makes you bill way over that amount anyway.
Cravath is one of them. That really tells you all you need to know about the importance of not having minimum billables.

dixiecupdrinking

Gold
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by dixiecupdrinking » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:19 pm

"No minimum billables" is to hours as "unlimited vacation days" is to time off.

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

DFTHREAD

Post by Desert Fox » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:23 pm

Image
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:41 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
UnicornHunter

Diamond
Posts: 13507
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by UnicornHunter » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:46 pm

Lincoln wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:
horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
this is actually a very interesting question

everybody stop talking about law schools (law school is sooo 3 years ago) and start talking about CREDITED places to work
Paul, Weiss, for one.
I feel like any place with no minimum for bonus is the sort of place where peer pressure makes you bill way over that amount anyway.
Cravath is one of them. That really tells you all you need to know about the importance of not having minimum billables.
Cravath is like the one place where it might be legit. If your partner doesn't have work, you don't have work. That being said, your partner has work.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
chup

Diamond
Posts: 22942
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by chup » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:48 pm

instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
instride91 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.
LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20.
LOL. Yes, both schools have solid regional reputations, like fellow T20 also-rans WUSTL and Minnesota. Have you checked out market salary in St. Louis and Minneapolis lately? That's where the LA market is heading, my friend.
Except no one wants to live in those areas...
Hey eff you buddy.

User avatar
First Offense

Platinum
Posts: 7091
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by First Offense » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:48 pm

I've always heard places with no minimum billables have no minimum billables because you're going to blow past any number they could dream up anyway.

User avatar
Glasseyes

Silver
Posts: 539
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:19 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by Glasseyes » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:18 am

Pretty sure Cadwalader has no min billables and lockstep, or they did for the DC office. NY is undoubtedly just as deadly as any other firm (or worse), though the associates in DC do seem to bill 1750-1850 pretty consistently. If they actually get the lockstep bonus, that sounds like a bearable life.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)

Post by rpupkin » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:21 am

Glasseyes wrote:Pretty sure Cadwalader has no min billables and lockstep, or they did for the DC office. NY is undoubtedly just as deadly as any other firm (or worse), though the associates in DC do seem to bill 1750-1850 pretty consistently. If they actually get the lockstep bonus, that sounds like a bearable life.
LJL. Uh, no.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”