instride91 wrote:I can't even... Until you have a shred of actual evidence that LA is "imminently" headed to "secondary-market status" (beyond your admittedly impressive ability to count T14 schools), I think I'll stick to "rationalizing my denial."rpupkin wrote: Don't mock me, bro. You're the one twisting yourself into logical contortions in order to rationalize your denial about LA's imminent secondary-market status. Silicon Beach? Really? And look at your list of law firms:
Latham: headquartered in NYC
O'Melveny: years of steady decline
MTO: not even V25
Irell: just lost all of its prestigious white collar attorneys
Gibson Dunn: flirts with V10 for years but keeps falling short; it's like UT with the T14.
Quinn Emanuel: LJL
NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
-
Traynor Brah

- Posts: 776
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Flame?instride91 wrote:I can't even... Until you have a shred of actual evidence that LA is "imminently" headed to "secondary-market status" (beyond your admittedly impressive ability to count T14 schools), I think I'll stick to "rationalizing my denial."rpupkin wrote:Don't mock me, bro. You're the one twisting yourself into logical contortions in order to rationalize your denial about LA's imminent secondary-market status. Silicon Beach? Really? And look at your list of law firms:instride91 wrote:Solid reasoning man...rpupkin wrote: LOL again. That's like saying no one wants to attend SLS or YLS because those schools have small class sizes.
Latham: headquartered in NYC
O'Melveny: years of steady decline
MTO: not even V25
Irell: just lost all of its prestigious white collar attorneys
Gibson Dunn: flirts with V10 for years but keeps falling short; it's like UT with the T14.
Quinn Emanuel: LJL
- 052220152

- Posts: 4798
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:24 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
guys i think we are getting a bit ahead of ourselves here. while LA is definitely sliding into secondary status due to their lack of t14s, i hardly doubt that ann arbor, durham, and new haven markets are going to bump up to 190 to match the other primaries. i could see them going to 160 with matching bonuses though.
-
Nekrowizard

- Posts: 367
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:53 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Please stop this egregious trolling.instride91 wrote:I can't even... Until you have a shred of actual evidence that LA is "imminently" headed to "secondary-market status" (beyond your admittedly impressive ability to count T14 schools), I think I'll stick to "rationalizing my denial."rpupkin wrote:Don't mock me, bro. You're the one twisting yourself into logical contortions in order to rationalize your denial about LA's imminent secondary-market status. Silicon Beach? Really? And look at your list of law firms:instride91 wrote:Solid reasoning man...rpupkin wrote: LOL again. That's like saying no one wants to attend SLS or YLS because those schools have small class sizes.
Latham: headquartered in NYC
O'Melveny: years of steady decline
MTO: not even V25
Irell: just lost all of its prestigious white collar attorneys
Gibson Dunn: flirts with V10 for years but keeps falling short; it's like UT with the T14.
Quinn Emanuel: LJL
Ah, but you see, there's only ONE (1) T14 school in those places. Of course they won't match.Jim Jones wrote:guys i think we are getting a bit ahead of ourselves here. while LA is definitely sliding into secondary status due to their lack of t14s, i hardly doubt that ann arbor, durham, and new haven markets are going to bump up to 190 to match the other primaries. i could see them going to 160 with matching bonuses though.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I think this thread is really good and I like it very much
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Proskauer.horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
after having spent the last 4 years in BIGLAW, i couldnt give a FUCK about law schools/rankings
accordingly, im going 2 use my EMERITUS status to request kindly an end to this stupid debate
accordingly, im going 2 use my EMERITUS status to request kindly an end to this stupid debate
-
hoos89

- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
LA to $115krpupkin wrote:LOL. Yes, both schools have solid regional reputations, like fellow T20 also-rans WUSTL and Minnesota. Have you checked out market salary in St. Louis and Minneapolis lately? That's where the LA market is heading, my friend.instride91 wrote:LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20.rpupkin wrote:I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Anonymous User wrote:Proskauer.horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
GOOD 2 KNO
-
Traynor Brah

- Posts: 776
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
***peer firmsAnonymous User wrote:Proskauer.horns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I call flame. No one with four years of experience in big law would write this:Big Shrimpin wrote:after having spent the last 4 years in BIGLAW, i couldnt give a FUCK about law schools/rankings
accordingly, im going 2 use my EMERITUS status to request kindly an end to this stupid debate
Big Shrimpin wrote:this is actually a very interesting questionhorns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
everybody stop talking about law schools (law school is sooo 3 years ago) and start talking about CREDITED places to work
Your request is denied and your emeritus status is under investigation.
- fats provolone

- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
LA is going to 190 but the last 30 will be taxed at 100%
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
took the only path that presented itself, so considering whether a firm paid bonuses without billable minimums was not a an analysis that i had the luxury to undertake
last poast ITT anyway
last poast ITT anyway
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Seriously, I think what DF wrote above is credited. A lack of a billable hour minimum (or a low billable hour minimum) is appealing in theory, but it makes little (if any) difference in practice.Big Shrimpin wrote:took the only path that presented itself, so considering whether a firm paid bonuses without billable
-
horns12

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:02 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Let's you hang out in a chill practice group for a few years not worrying about hours, but probably doesn't affect too many people.rpupkin wrote:Seriously, I think what DF wrote above is credited. A lack of a billable hour minimum (or a low billable hour minimum) is appealing in theory, but it makes little (if any) difference in practice.Big Shrimpin wrote:took the only path that presented itself, so considering whether a firm paid bonuses without billable
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Once a firm ends up with "chill practice groups" with more than a handful of associates, the firm starts doing stuff like imposing minimum billable hour targets for bonuses. That's the thing: the firms that don't have minimums generally don't need them because almost all the associates are billing a ton anyway.horns12 wrote:Let's you hang out in a chill practice group for a few years not worrying about hours, but probably doesn't affect too many people.rpupkin wrote:Seriously, I think what DF wrote above is credited. A lack of a billable hour minimum (or a low billable hour minimum) is appealing in theory, but it makes little (if any) difference in practice.Big Shrimpin wrote:took the only path that presented itself, so considering whether a firm paid bonuses without billable
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Lincoln

- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:27 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Cravath is one of them. That really tells you all you need to know about the importance of not having minimum billables.Desert Fox wrote:I feel like any place with no minimum for bonus is the sort of place where peer pressure makes you bill way over that amount anyway.Anonymous User wrote:Paul, Weiss, for one.Big Shrimpin wrote:this is actually a very interesting questionhorns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
everybody stop talking about law schools (law school is sooo 3 years ago) and start talking about CREDITED places to work
-
dixiecupdrinking

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
"No minimum billables" is to hours as "unlimited vacation days" is to time off.
- Desert Fox

- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
- UnicornHunter

- Posts: 13507
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Cravath is like the one place where it might be legit. If your partner doesn't have work, you don't have work. That being said, your partner has work.Lincoln wrote:Cravath is one of them. That really tells you all you need to know about the importance of not having minimum billables.Desert Fox wrote:I feel like any place with no minimum for bonus is the sort of place where peer pressure makes you bill way over that amount anyway.Anonymous User wrote:Paul, Weiss, for one.Big Shrimpin wrote:this is actually a very interesting questionhorns12 wrote:Which firms give lock-step bonuses with no minimum billables? Looking at past years it doesn't look like there are many.
everybody stop talking about law schools (law school is sooo 3 years ago) and start talking about CREDITED places to work
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chup

- Posts: 22942
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Hey eff you buddy.instride91 wrote:Except no one wants to live in those areas...rpupkin wrote:LOL. Yes, both schools have solid regional reputations, like fellow T20 also-rans WUSTL and Minnesota. Have you checked out market salary in St. Louis and Minneapolis lately? That's where the LA market is heading, my friend.instride91 wrote:LA has UCLA and USC. While not T14, they still have great reputations and are both T20.rpupkin wrote:I find this unsurprising. When NYC moves to 190K, I doubt that LA will be brought along for the ride. Consider: The other major legal markets--NYC, Chicago, and SF/SV--each contain two prestigious T14 law schools. How many elite law schools does LA have? Zero. Frankly, the writing has been on the wall for years that LA is destined to become a below-market city.gaddockteeg wrote:FWIW, my friend at simpson thacher (2nd year associate) LA has heard nothing about htis and said its "probably not true".
- First Offense

- Posts: 7091
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I've always heard places with no minimum billables have no minimum billables because you're going to blow past any number they could dream up anyway.
- Glasseyes

- Posts: 539
- Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:19 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Pretty sure Cadwalader has no min billables and lockstep, or they did for the DC office. NY is undoubtedly just as deadly as any other firm (or worse), though the associates in DC do seem to bill 1750-1850 pretty consistently. If they actually get the lockstep bonus, that sounds like a bearable life.
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
LJL. Uh, no.Glasseyes wrote:Pretty sure Cadwalader has no min billables and lockstep, or they did for the DC office. NY is undoubtedly just as deadly as any other firm (or worse), though the associates in DC do seem to bill 1750-1850 pretty consistently. If they actually get the lockstep bonus, that sounds like a bearable life.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
