2011 GW OCI Thread Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 11:59 am

Anonymous User wrote:Anyone hear back from WSGR?
Same poster as quoted below, and yes.
Anonymous User wrote:I got a CB last night from a large California office of a firm that interviewed on Tuesday.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:06 pm

Email ding from Chadbourne today. Given that I'm into litigation and they're only hiring for transactional, and that I called them by another firm's name near the end, not hugely surprised. C'est la vie.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:20 pm

Still no response from Latham, Paul Hastings, or Akin Gump?
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:47 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Anyone hear back from WSGR?
Same poster as quoted below, and yes.
Anonymous User wrote:I got a CB last night from a large California office of a firm that interviewed on Tuesday.
hmmmm....why does it seem like DC offices of all the firms are taking longer than their CA and NY offices...go figure.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:54 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Still no response from Latham, Paul Hastings, or Akin Gump?
Nothing here from the first two (for DC and NY, respectively).
Top

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!

Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:55 pm

I thought somebody else posted this ITT: WilmerHale DC ding yesterday via e-mail.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 2:05 pm

Anonymous User wrote:hmmmm....why does it seem like DC offices of all the firms are taking longer than their CA and NY offices...go figure.
What other CA offices have come out?
Top
User avatar
dood

Gold
Posts: 1639
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:59 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by dood » Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:22 pm

dudders wrote:the most remarkable part of my day was someone wearing a skirt that was HILARIOUSLY too short.
nice. pics please.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:18 pm

chirp chirp chirp
Top

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:20 pm

Anonymous User wrote:chirp chirp chirp
QFT
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:50 pm

Kirkland DC CB
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 7:34 pm

Kirkland DC CB, PH NY CB
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:04 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Kirkland DC CB, PH NY CB
I was really hoping for PH NY. Oh well. Congrats.
Top

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!

Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:10 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Kirkland DC CB, PH NY CB
Phone or email?
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:17 pm

Anyone hear from PH DC? Any chance NY went tonight while DC won't go until next week, or is that just wishful thinking?
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:33 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Kirkland DC CB, PH NY CB
Congrats. How and when did you hear from PH NY? Did the interviewer contact you or the recruiter?
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Aug 20, 2011 1:00 am

Anonymous User wrote:Same poster as quoted -- I have heard nothing from Baker Botts, Paul Hastings or McKenna. I think we just have to cross our fingers and hope Friday is a big day.
McKenna CB on Friday; Bingham email ding.
Top

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...

Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Aug 20, 2011 1:06 am

Anonymous User wrote:McKenna CB on Friday; Bingham email ding.
Which McKenna schedule, litigation or gov't contracts (if you're willing to say)? Probably no difference, but just curious.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Aug 20, 2011 1:14 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:McKenna CB on Friday; Bingham email ding.
Which McKenna schedule, litigation or gov't contracts (if you're willing to say)? Probably no difference, but just curious.
gov't contracts.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:16 am

Anyone hear from Wilson Sonsini's DC office yet?
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:52 am

.
Top

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!

Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:58 am

Anyone hear from K&L Gates?
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:39 am

At this point I think it's fair to say that the vast majority of firms that interviewed last week haven't gotten callbacks out yet. The only other two explanations are: GW students don't really post on TLS (for shame! don't lurk!), or GW is getting murdered by OCI this year and practically none of us are getting callbacks. I think probably we should all just relax until next weekend, and then we can start assuming we didn't get callbacks if firms haven't gotten back to us.

While we wait, a PSA for when classes start in September: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gMtSf2vbZs
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:49 am

PH NY CB on Friday from the interviewer.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2011 GW OCI Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 21, 2011 12:40 pm

Anonymous User wrote:PH NY CB on Friday from the interviewer.
Would you mind reporting what firms?
Top

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”