I'd be interested in seeing that.Guchster wrote:guys i can post the V10 on here. those numbers shouldn't be too hard.
Also, anyone have U of C data yet?
I'd be interested in seeing that.Guchster wrote:guys i can post the V10 on here. those numbers shouldn't be too hard.
why are you anonymous?Anonymous User wrote:For CLS:
based on this spreadsheet we all got at Monday's meeting, 323 students from the class of 2013 accepted summer associate offers from biglaw firms at EIP
however, a bunch of firms didn't report data, so there are probably a couple more than that. also, im guessing a handful also found biglaw jobs outside of EIP.
for reference, there are 439 students in the class of 2013, so according to OCS approximately 404 (92%) participated at EIP.
well since im not entirely sure we are supposed to share this, until someone convinces me otherwise i'd rather just play it safe.Guchster wrote:why are you anonymous?Anonymous User wrote:For CLS:
based on this spreadsheet we all got at Monday's meeting, 323 students from the class of 2013 accepted summer associate offers from biglaw firms at EIP
however, a bunch of firms didn't report data, so there are probably a couple more than that. also, im guessing a handful also found biglaw jobs outside of EIP.
for reference, there are 439 students in the class of 2013, so according to OCS approximately 404 (92%) participated at EIP.
How many CLS students at those 3 firms(munger, susman, W&C)? Could you give a breakdown in terms of callbacks/offer ratio?Anonymous User wrote:For CLS:
based on this spreadsheet we all got at Monday's meeting, 323 students from the class of 2013 accepted summer associate offers from biglaw firms at EIP
however, a bunch of firms didn't report data, so there are probably a couple more than that. also, im guessing a handful also found biglaw jobs outside of EIP.
for reference, there are 439 students in the class of 2013, so according to OCS approximately 404 (92%) participated at EIP.
For v10: 111 total
IMO v10 leaves out a handful of pretty well-regarded firms, so looping in boies, debevoise, gdc, irell, latham, munger, paul weiss, quinn, sidley, susman, w&c, and wilmer (dc) brings the total to 161.
not trying to troll for any firms in particular, so if you want to see others added to the list I can do that fairly quickly, but dont have time right now to compile a list of v10, v25, v50, etc. though i'm sure someone will after exams.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
If those numbers are accurate then 40% (161/404) of the class got ~V20 firm jobs. Either things have gotten alot better or CLS crushed it this year.drbarry987 wrote:Wow. CLS absolutely killed it with top firms. Did NYU do anywhere near as well?
That puts them at 78.2% versus 76.7% for C/O 2012.Guchster wrote:Numbers from CLS. We don't have access to all the informational digitally, and I'm too lazy to type up stuff.
But they said 92% of our class did EIP at CLS, and 85% of those 92% got at least 1 offer.
Man you poor ITE-addled kids. 23% V10 placement is good, but Columbia had 38% V10 placement during summer '06. Columbia has always sent a ton of people into the V10, which hires ~1,000 summer associates each year. Something like 15% of all summer associate positions in the country are at a V10 firm.Bronck wrote:Holy crap those are insane numbers for the v10
Not to mention it doesn't seem out of the question considering a lot of the V10 have some of the larger summer classes, and being based out of NYC, Columbia is really the home market school for most of them.rayiner wrote:Man you poor ITE-addled kids. 23% V10 placement is good, but Columbia had 38% V10 placement during summer '06.Bronck wrote:Holy crap those are insane numbers for the v10
Haha I know I was looking at the 2006 stats just a moment ago. But still that's very encouraging stats.rayiner wrote:Man you poor ITE-addled kids. 23% V10 placement is good, but Columbia had 38% V10 placement during summer '06.Bronck wrote:Holy crap those are insane numbers for the v10
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
I mean it's not discouraging, but for context Columbia is down from 91%* for summer 2009 to 78% for summer 2013. New York is the market that has recovered the most and Columbia is the best school in New York. That's telling about how soft the market still is.Bronck wrote:Haha I know I was looking at the 2006 stats just a moment ago. But still that's very encouraging stats.rayiner wrote:Man you poor ITE-addled kids. 23% V10 placement is good, but Columbia had 38% V10 placement during summer '06.Bronck wrote:Holy crap those are insane numbers for the v10
+1Anonymous User wrote:Can someone post UChi's and NYU's v10-v20 stats?
For those of us making decisions between the two...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
You're misreading what I wrote earlier. We had an 85% offer rate.rayiner wrote:I mean it's not discouraging, but for context Columbia is down from 91%* for summer 2009 to 78% for summer 2013. New York is the market that has recovered the most and Columbia is the best school in New York. That's telling about how soft the market still is.Bronck wrote:Haha I know I was looking at the 2006 stats just a moment ago. But still that's very encouraging stats.rayiner wrote:Man you poor ITE-addled kids. 23% V10 placement is good, but Columbia had 38% V10 placement during summer '06.Bronck wrote:Holy crap those are insane numbers for the v10
*) And that's 91% actually working, versus 78% with offers.
Fair point. Assuming the economy continues its steady but slow trend up, I wouldn't be surprised if the number is around 80-85% by the time I OCI in 2013. Definitely not pre-ITE numbers, but I would feel safe at median at a school like CLS.rayiner wrote:I mean it's not discouraging, but for context Columbia is down from 91%* for summer 2009 to 78% for summer 2013. New York is the market that has recovered the most and Columbia is the best school in New York. That's telling about how soft the market still is.Bronck wrote:Haha I know I was looking at the 2006 stats just a moment ago. But still that's very encouraging stats.rayiner wrote:Man you poor ITE-addled kids. 23% V10 placement is good, but Columbia had 38% V10 placement during summer '06.Bronck wrote:Holy crap those are insane numbers for the v10
*) And that's 91% actually working, versus 78% with offers.
I think rayiner is just comparing the 91% doing a 2L firm job for c/o 2010 with the 78% of the total c/o 2013 who received at least 1 offer at EIW. This probably understates what the same number doing 2L firm jobs will be for c/o 2013 though, right? There will be at least a few more people that get offers through mass-mail or job fairs or 3L OCI, and maybe a few more doing non-Biglaw firm jobs by the time everything sorts itself out (along with people who turn down their offers)?Guchster wrote: You're misreading what I wrote earlier. We had an 85% offer rate.
The 78% number you're citing includes those 8% that didn't even show up to EIP at all.
The 78% figure is the %-age of the whole class who got an offer for summer 2012.Guchster wrote:You're misreading what I wrote earlier. We had an 85% offer rate.rayiner wrote:I mean it's not discouraging, but for context Columbia is down from 91%* for summer 2009 to 78% for summer 2013. New York is the market that has recovered the most and Columbia is the best school in New York. That's telling about how soft the market still is.Bronck wrote:Haha I know I was looking at the 2006 stats just a moment ago. But still that's very encouraging stats.rayiner wrote:
Man you poor ITE-addled kids. 23% V10 placement is good, but Columbia had 38% V10 placement during summer '06.
*) And that's 91% actually working, versus 78% with offers.
The 78% number you're citing includes those 8% that didn't even show up to EIP at all.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Current students have to leak it. And not everyone provides data that detailed--I think Michigan gave 3-year averaged OCI data to previous classes, although they're being more transparent now so that may change. I still think c/o 2013 summer data generally looks a lot more encouraging than the c/o 2011 employment stats, so I don't see why schools wouldn't want to push that info out there fast.Mr. Somebody wrote:Is it possible to get that kind of data for other T14's too?
srsly.kwais wrote:well, either way, when you need top %10 at many Tier 1 schools for biglaw, I'd say %78 is pretty sweet. Gives a different spin to getting median pwnd
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login