Mr. T6 wrote:What time do you suggest?
Reading supplements? Usually irrelevant. (plus/minus Senor Helmholz)
Reading the cases again? I'm not sure how that would help you. You already know the legal issue and how the court reasoned through it.
Outline? It's better to do that toward the end, so you understand the big picture.
Take practice exams? I always did all of them, fully-timed.
One hits diminishing marginal returns quickly in Law School. Worse, you can detract from your test day performance by learning irrelevant material that the professor neither wants nor expects to see on the exam.
But . . . whatever works for you. I think that all of our class gunners would have performed equally well with less prep. You reach a point at which you know 1) the law 2) how to apply the law, and then it's whoever best unpacks a few fact patterns within three or four hours.
I'm not saying, "Don't study." I'm saying, "Read the cases, outline, take practice exams, and then give it a rest." The aforementioned should not cut into your weekends.
It depends on the class, of course, but in many classes rereading the notes again and again was helpful. Cases, not so much except for big ones where understanding analysis was important. And supplements help to clarify the course in general, or specific issues where the prof wasn't clear.
You can't save outlining until the end, though. There's not enough time to make a comprehensive outline if you wait. I made a comprehensive outline for every course containing everything important, and outlined this to create a sleeker model towards the end. This takes substantial effort, but it puts the entire course to memory. I wouldn't have been able to do this had I waited even until the middle of the quarter to begin outlining.