Admissions Potential? Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
kmj12

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:02 am

Admissions Potential?

Post by kmj12 » Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:06 am

Hey all,

I went to a great UC in California, graduated with about 19 A+s with a 3.99GPA, but got a 161 on the LSAT. I have a great story to tell on my personal statement. Do you think it's possible to still get into the top 10?

Thanks!

Hand

Gold
Posts: 3843
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by Hand » Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:17 am

Just retake already you lazy bum

User avatar
cavalier1138

Moderator
Posts: 8007
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by cavalier1138 » Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:05 am

Some schools favor reverse splitters, but a 161 is gong to take you out of the running for almost the entire T14. You certainly wouldn't get money offers.

You have a stellar GPA. Don't waste it.

User avatar
Dcc617

Gold
Posts: 2744
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by Dcc617 » Tue Jul 05, 2016 10:24 am

Yep. Retake. Trust me, I know how much it sucks to do it, but you have to.

What was your score breakdown?

kmj12

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:02 am

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by kmj12 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:50 pm

I missed 16 on LR, 5 on LG and 5 on RC. Really, re-take? I studied for the test for the entire year after graduation college - didn't work, just played soccer and studied. I just don't see value in wasting more time on this test.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
pancakes3

Platinum
Posts: 6619
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by pancakes3 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:53 pm

kmj12 wrote:I missed 16 on LR, 5 on LG and 5 on RC. Really, re-take? I studied for the test for the entire year after graduation college - didn't work, just played soccer and studied. I just don't see value in wasting more time on this test.
oh, not much... just hundreds of thousands of dollars in scholarship, the fate of your legal career, and as much prestige as you care to masturbate to...

grades??

Silver
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by grades?? » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:56 pm

You missed 16 on LR????? If you cut that number in half alone, you now have a 168/169. That might get you in the top 10. Literally if you do anything but retake you are wasting that gpa and your time.

Listen, I know retaking sucks. I did it 3 times. My first lsat score was a 158/159. After spending a full year and taking every lsat from 1-74 3 times in full testing conditions, I finally was able to break into the mid 170s club. It was a struggle, a year of pain and lsat. BUT YOU CAN DO IT TOO. Just grow a pair and get to really studying. That might mean taking every lsat ever given in full testing conditions. three times. Its what I needed. You can do it.

User avatar
mukol

Bronze
Posts: 482
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:46 pm

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by mukol » Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:03 pm

kmj12 wrote:Hey all,

I went to a great UC in California, graduated with about 19 A+s with a 3.99GPA, but got a 161 on the LSAT. I have a great story to tell on my personal statement. Do you think it's possible to still get into the top 10?

Thanks!
Retake or don't bother going.

I didn't retake, but I should have. I'll always regret it. Don't be me.

kmj12

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:02 am

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by kmj12 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:06 pm

Grades?? you definitely have a point. And you're right. But that's the thing - I started with a 135. I came up 26 points. 3 months before the LSAT I went to harvard law where my sister is and secluded myself for 3 straight months studying. It's certainly easy to say I've done enough. And i think I have. If i re take in Sept it'll be my third retake. Gonna think long and hard about it. But thanks for your insight grades??

Also, I just wanted to make it clear where I'm coming from. I failed the SAT but performed incredibly at college. Berkeley Law even says: "When evaluating LSAT scores we may consider whether similar tests have under-predicted your academic performance in the past. For example, if you can document that you have earned exceptionally high undergraduate grades but performed badly on the SAT, then this may be taken into account in evaluating your potential to succeed in law school. Be sure to document your test-taking history by including a copy of your SAT or ACT scores with your application."

I think schools want numbers, but it's not STRICTLY a numbers game.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


grades??

Silver
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by grades?? » Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:10 pm

kmj12 wrote:Grades?? you definitely have a point. And you're right. But that's the thing - I started with a 135. I came up 26 points. 3 months before the LSAT I went to harvard law where my sister is and secluded myself for 3 straight months studying. It's certainly easy to say I've done enough. And i think I have. If i re take in Sept it'll be my third retake. Gonna think long and hard about it. But thanks for your insight grades??

Also, I just wanted to make it clear where I'm coming from. I failed the SAT but performed incredibly at college. Berkeley Law even says: "When evaluating LSAT scores we may consider whether similar tests have under-predicted your academic performance in the past. For example, if you can document that you have earned exceptionally high undergraduate grades but performed badly on the SAT, then this may be taken into account in evaluating your potential to succeed in law school. Be sure to document your test-taking history by including a copy of your SAT or ACT scores with your application."

I think schools want numbers, but it's not STRICTLY a numbers game.
Actually it pretty much is. It is 99.5% grades, lsat, and URM status. the .5% being for olympic athletes, rhodes scholars, etc. Listen I feel you. I started at 142. Not much different from you. I went to grad school full time. Went home, made dinner, then went back to the library and worked from 7-10ish every night and then at least 1 full day on the weekends. Listen to yourself. "It's certainly easy to say I've done enough." Says who? You are acting like a child. Man up and work harder if you want a top 10 school. Because you aren't getting in to a top ten school with your current score and combo. I appreciate you have had trouble taking tests previously, but no school is actually going to care about that story. Go download every lsat. Take each one. Then do it again. If you want something bad enough, you will work hard for it. Dont cop out like you are now.

User avatar
Dcc617

Gold
Posts: 2744
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by Dcc617 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:11 pm

kmj12 wrote:Grades?? you definitely have a point. And you're right. But that's the thing - I started with a 135. I came up 26 points. 3 months before the LSAT I went to harvard law where my sister is and secluded myself for 3 straight months studying. It's certainly easy to say I've done enough. And i think I have. If i re take in Sept it'll be my third retake. Gonna think long and hard about it. But thanks for your insight grades??

Also, I just wanted to make it clear where I'm coming from. I failed the SAT but performed incredibly at college. Berkeley Law even says: "When evaluating LSAT scores we may consider whether similar tests have under-predicted your academic performance in the past. For example, if you can document that you have earned exceptionally high undergraduate grades but performed badly on the SAT, then this may be taken into account in evaluating your potential to succeed in law school. Be sure to document your test-taking history by including a copy of your SAT or ACT scores with your application."

I think schools want numbers, but it's not STRICTLY a numbers game.
Please report back after your cycle. But even a couple points could be a super big deal for you.

Good luck.

User avatar
cavalier1138

Moderator
Posts: 8007
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by cavalier1138 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:14 pm

kmj12 wrote:I think schools want numbers, but it's not STRICTLY a numbers game.
I think that's a delightfully naive point of view.

As you spotted, Berkeley is the least likely to weight your LSAT score higher than your GPA. And you still fall below their 25th percentile for LSAT score. That said, they are literally the only school in the T14 that would even be plausible for you. Every other T14 (except Yale, and you aren't even in the ballpark for the LSAT) places far more weight on your LSAT score.

There are always other factors that make admissions less of a strict numbers game, but the fact is that you need to have adequate numbers for those factors to even come into play.

kmj12

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:02 am

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by kmj12 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:14 pm

gradess?? you're right you're right. few months of pain, lifetime of gain. thank you for your insight. i really appreciate it

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


kmj12

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:02 am

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by kmj12 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:15 pm

thanks everyone, i'm gonna get back to studying

HonestAdvice

Bronze
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 12:33 pm

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by HonestAdvice » Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:17 pm

A -5 on RC and -8 on LR means you weren't prepared for some question types. My guess is there's one or two question types you could learn in a day that sunk your score by 5 points so even without any other progress you should get a 166, which get you a full ride at any school with a <166 median. .

grades??

Silver
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by grades?? » Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:17 pm

kmj12 wrote:gradess?? you're right you're right. few months of pain, lifetime of gain. thank you for your insight. i really appreciate it
No problem. Ive been there. Studied for a year to get a 158/159. The effort, feeling like it was enough. But I wanted to go to a top 14 school like yourself with some of it being paid for. Someone on this site advised me to take every lsat. So I did. It took me 3 times of doing that before I was able to feel comfortable enough to register for that final 3rd try. I crushed it having experienced every question ever asked over and over again. Now my story is a more extreme one but its a truthful one. Now I'm at UVA/DUKE on a huge scholarship and don't regret a second of the pain. Dont settle.

pittsburghpirates

Silver
Posts: 1138
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 11:38 am

Re: Admissions Potential?

Post by pittsburghpirates » Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:19 pm

kmj12 wrote:thanks everyone, i'm gonna get back to studying
Good choice OP, best of luck in your continued studying!

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”