What would constitute "average" softs? Forum
- carlos_danger
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 12:21 am
What would constitute "average" softs?
People always refer to their softs so confidently as strong, weak, etc. How do you know?
Is it possible to have "average" softs with no leadership? I did a summer study abroad, have one year decent work experience in a law-related field, wrote for the school newspaper, held substantial internships and jobs throughout college (including one at the White House), and graduated with pretty decent academic honors including PBK. How would those rate? Do I need to explain to law schools the reason I didn't do more leadership stuff was because I was working all the time?
Is it possible to have "average" softs with no leadership? I did a summer study abroad, have one year decent work experience in a law-related field, wrote for the school newspaper, held substantial internships and jobs throughout college (including one at the White House), and graduated with pretty decent academic honors including PBK. How would those rate? Do I need to explain to law schools the reason I didn't do more leadership stuff was because I was working all the time?
-
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:07 pm
Re: What would constitute "average" softs?
"Average" is contextual. Do you mean "average" for HYS? For a T14 school? For a T30 school? etc.carlos_danger wrote:People always refer to their softs so confidently as strong, weak, etc. How do you know?
Is it possible to have "average" softs with no leadership? I did a summer study abroad, have one year decent work experience in a law-related field, wrote for the school newspaper, held substantial internships and jobs throughout college (including one at the White House), and graduated with pretty decent academic honors including PBK. How would those rate? Do I need to explain to law schools the reason I didn't do more leadership stuff was because I was working all the time?
But yes, it's possible to have above average softs at all of these levels with no leadership positions. There's no formula to "softs." That's why people call them softs.
-
- Posts: 3592
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:55 pm
Re: What would constitute "average" softs?
I think pretty much any UG/person with 2 years work experience is gonna have the "average" softs. I think of average relative to what's above-average or unique. Fulbright, Rhodes, PhD, NYT best selling author, I think those are unique/above-average. Don't think there's much of a difference from the kid who played D-1 football to the kid who wrote a senior thesis to the kid that was on the mock trial team, all pretty much the same.
Last edited by GreenEggs on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:07 pm
Re: What would constitute "average" softs?
I disagree. I think D-1 football counts as "above average" just about everywhere. I think being on your mock trial team (assuming nothing more) counts as "below average" just about everywhere. Things like "NYT best selling author" are going to be exemplary softs even at HYS. That doesn't mean if you're a NYT bestselling author you're automatically getting into HYS. But your softs will definitely help.DCfilterDC wrote:I think pretty much any UG/person with 2 years work experience is gonna have the "average" softs. I think of average relative to what's above-average or unique. Fulbright, Rhodes, PhD, NYT best selling author, I think those are unique/above-average. Don't think there's much of a difference from the kid who played D-1 football to the kid who wrote a senior thesis to the kid that was on the mock trial team, all pretty much the same.
It's really impossible to say much more, though, without knowing what range of schools we're talking about.
-
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:07 pm
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- blerggggg
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 1:42 pm
Re: What would constitute "average" softs?
Lollll, Elizabeth Wurtzel anyone???abl wrote:DCfilterDC wrote: That doesn't mean if you're a NYT bestselling author you're automatically getting into HYS. But your softs will definitely help.
-
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:07 pm
Re: What would constitute "average" softs?
Prozac Nation isn't just any NYT bestseller. Also, she went to Harvard for undergrad and scored in the 80th percentile on her LSAT (pretty unimpressive for YLS, but also far from embarrassing). And she's pretty much the "wait, really, she got in?" extreme example for HYS.blerggggg wrote:Lollll, Elizabeth Wurtzel anyone???abl wrote:DCfilterDC wrote: That doesn't mean if you're a NYT bestselling author you're automatically getting into HYS. But your softs will definitely help.
But in any event, I think this illustrates my underlying point, which is that "NYT bestselling author" is more than an "above average" soft.
- carlos_danger
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 12:21 am
Re: What would constitute "average" softs?
I think abl's right. On LSN you see D1 athletes get in with way lower numbers than median/median.abl wrote:I disagree. I think D-1 football counts as "above average" just about everywhere. I think being on your mock trial team (assuming nothing more) counts as "below average" just about everywhere. Things like "NYT best selling author" are going to be exemplary softs even at HYS. That doesn't mean if you're a NYT bestselling author you're automatically getting into HYS. But your softs will definitely help.DCfilterDC wrote:I think pretty much any UG/person with 2 years work experience is gonna have the "average" softs. I think of average relative to what's above-average or unique. Fulbright, Rhodes, PhD, NYT best selling author, I think those are unique/above-average. Don't think there's much of a difference from the kid who played D-1 football to the kid who wrote a senior thesis to the kid that was on the mock trial team, all pretty much the same.
It's really impossible to say much more, though, without knowing what range of schools we're talking about.