What's up with UCIrvine re: clerkships? Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
Nagster5

Silver
Posts: 764
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 11:28 am

What's up with UCIrvine re: clerkships?

Post by Nagster5 » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:35 pm

UC-Irvine seems to punch WAY outside it's weight class WRT federal clerkship numbers. #2 after Yale in 2012 with 29%. #3 behind Yale and Stanford with 18% in 2013. #9 in 2014, still very impressive at 11%.

I realize these probably aren't the most preftigious of federal clerkships, but is there some explanation as to why they consistently beat out "better" schools? How does a school whose grads are unemployed 1/4 to 1/3 of the time pull this off consistently? Even accounting for it's higher admissions requirements WRT its ranking due to the new school weirdness, it beats out schools like UT (comparable entrance stats) that have huge alumni bases and a stranglehold on large markets. Is it the quality/connections of the faculty? Am I missing something?

User avatar
WinterComing

Silver
Posts: 729
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:10 am

Re: What's up with UCIrvine re: clerkships?

Post by WinterComing » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:39 pm

From what I've heard, it's all about Erwin Chemerinsky using his personal connections.

User avatar
fliptrip

Gold
Posts: 1879
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 9:10 pm

Re: What's up with UCIrvine re: clerkships?

Post by fliptrip » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:41 pm

WinterComing wrote:From what I've heard, it's all about Erwin Chemerinsky using his personal connections.
This.

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: What's up with UCIrvine re: clerkships?

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:46 pm

Yup. Also I don't think the classes are very large, and for the first few years, students who enrolled got full scholarships (it tapered down from full to less to less with each year), so the school was able to attract very competitive applicants (not knocking current students or anything, that was just how the school got people with good stats to go to a brand new law school). And a lot of competitive clerkship applicants bring a lot of pre-law school accomplishments to the table.

But mostly Chemerinsky.

User avatar
zot1

Gold
Posts: 4476
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:53 am

Re: What's up with UCIrvine re: clerkships?

Post by zot1 » Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:28 pm

Hey, now.

Student quality in general has a lot to do with it.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


vcap180

Bronze
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 12:48 am

Re: What's up with UCIrvine re: clerkships?

Post by vcap180 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:53 pm

i was about to make a thread about this topic, but i just came across this one. the fed clerkship number i see on LST for Irvine is about 13%. is this not astronomically high for a school outside of the top 20? is it really because of the founding dean?

kingwhereofis

New
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2016 2:59 pm

Re: What's up with UCIrvine re: clerkships?

Post by kingwhereofis » Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:38 pm

vcap180 wrote:i was about to make a thread about this topic, but i just came across this one. the fed clerkship number i see on LST for Irvine is about 13%. is this not astronomically high for a school outside of the top 20? is it really because of the founding dean?
At the end of the day a recommendation only goes so far, even if it's from Chemerinsky. Realistically it's some combination of judges' interest in the program at UCI, the career office's focus on getting students clerkships, the connections of the faculty (not just Chemerinsky), and probably the students themselves.

User avatar
pancakes3

Platinum
Posts: 6619
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm

Re: What's up with UCIrvine re: clerkships?

Post by pancakes3 » Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:49 pm

kingwhereofis wrote:
vcap180 wrote:i was about to make a thread about this topic, but i just came across this one. the fed clerkship number i see on LST for Irvine is about 13%. is this not astronomically high for a school outside of the top 20? is it really because of the founding dean?
At the end of the day a recommendation only goes so far, even if it's from Chemerinsky. Realistically it's some combination of judges' interest in the program at UCI, the career office's focus on getting students clerkships, the connections of the faculty (not just Chemerinsky), and probably the students themselves.
I mean... why do you think judges are interested in a program that only received full ABA accreditation in 2014?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”