LSAT addendum critique? Forum

[87mm]

I took the LSAT 3 times (June 155, Oct 160, Dec 167). I will need to explain the score discrepancy or at least explain if I believe my score is indicative of my performance/potential.

"I am a full time employee in a rotational development program. Although I sacrifice my weekends and rearrange my schedule
to prepare for the LSAT, my early performance on the exam is not indicative of my ability to be a successful law student. My strong
performance in the Georgia Tech aerospace engineering program (ranked 2nd nationally), graduate studies at one of Japan's premier robotics laboratories, and upward trending LSAT test scores best reflect my potential to be an exceptional law student at _______."

I am sure I can score higher if given a few more months. Most of it was translating my technical/analytical skill to the LSAT and argumentative skills used in law school. I have no major excuse other than time.

[chickensoup1234]

I'm not sure what other's would say in this instance, but my feeling is that the incremental score increases speak for themselves. Admissions will know the rigor of your undergrad and will see your performance. If you are sure you can score higher then maybe you want to give it another shot if possible given the time? Your call, but if there was a vote to submit an addendum or not, I would vote for "no."

[87mm]

I'm not sure what other's would say in this instance, but my feeling is that the incremental score increases speak for themselves. Admissions will know the rigor of your undergrad and will see your performance. If you are sure you can score higher then maybe you want to give it another shot if possible given the time? Your call, but if there was a vote to submit an addendum or not, I would vote for "no."

Thank you. Yeah, it may be grasping at straws by submitting an addendum. Plus they know I work full time from my PS. I will not submit one.