Investment Banking vs Big Law Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
Lawdood

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 11:54 am

Investment Banking vs Big Law

Post by Lawdood » Thu Jul 02, 2015 7:41 pm

DON'T KILL ME PLS!

I know that this topic has been beaten to death but I wanted to get an updated response (2015).

Which is better?

If money were no option, which one would you pick? If you've worked in both, which one do you prefer and why?
Also, is the grass always greener?

I shall hide now :|

hartfordhockaloogies

New
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 3:55 pm

Re: Investment Banking vs Big Law

Post by hartfordhockaloogies » Thu Jul 02, 2015 7:50 pm

If you want money > anything, choose IB

If you enjoy time > money, choose BigLaw

If you enjoy life > money, choose neither

Lawdood

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 11:54 am

Re: Investment Banking vs Big Law

Post by Lawdood » Thu Jul 02, 2015 7:53 pm

hartfordhockaloogies wrote:If you want money > anything, choose IB

If you enjoy time > money, choose BigLaw

If you enjoy life > money, choose neither
Thanks

But does that argument still hold when the majority of Investment banking analysts leave for HF/PE/VC or corporate which work significantly less hours?

Probably less than BIGLAW.

dabigchina

Gold
Posts: 1845
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am

Re: Investment Banking vs Big Law

Post by dabigchina » Thu Jul 02, 2015 7:55 pm

who told you HF/PE/VC work fewer hours?

Lawdood

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 11:54 am

Re: Investment Banking vs Big Law

Post by Lawdood » Thu Jul 02, 2015 7:59 pm

dabigchina wrote:who told you HF/PE/VC work fewer hours?
I read on WSO that most HF/PE/VC funds work 50-60 hours per week which is less than big law and IB.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Hutz_and_Goodman

Gold
Posts: 1651
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am

Re: Investment Banking vs Big Law

Post by Hutz_and_Goodman » Thu Jul 02, 2015 8:07 pm

If money is no option then do IB or big law only if you're passionate about law or finance. If not, then do something like be an entrepreneur. I don't see why, if money is no option, you'd spend 60-85 hrs a week doing something you are not passionate about.
Last edited by Hutz_and_Goodman on Thu Jul 02, 2015 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
sims1

Bronze
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:03 am

Re: Investment Banking vs Big Law

Post by sims1 » Thu Jul 02, 2015 8:16 pm

Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:do something like be an entrepreneur.
Uh u realize many people go to law school b/c they are risk averse right?

Petrichor

Bronze
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 12:51 pm

Re: Investment Banking vs Big Law

Post by Petrichor » Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:00 pm

I would say IB is superior in almost every way.

Generally IB analysts (entry level) are picked up from prestigious UGs so that means you have already distinguished yourself, apparently law schools generally do not distinguish that much across UGs and major GPAs so it is theoretically easier to gain entry to a top tier law school than a top tier IB firm, you also gained 3 years of salary and WE while law students are in the classroom.

IB exit options are insanely diverse, many go to the MBA then associate/VP route, some go to HF or PE. Even if you don't like any of these you can do something completely unrelated that still relies on your quant/sales skills, with a M7 MBA your options are much broader than a typical t-14 grad-to-big law associate.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”