least useful rankings ever? Forum
- KMart

- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:25 am
Re: least useful rankings ever?
Any rankings with Fordham at the top of it is a bad list.
- ReasonableNprudent

- Posts: 161
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 10:12 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
Wasn't there a ranking a few years ago published by Cooley that had themselves as #1, for having the largest collective library?
I'm not sure if it still exists or not. But, yeah, that one.
I'm not sure if it still exists or not. But, yeah, that one.
- buckiguy_sucks

- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
.
Last edited by buckiguy_sucks on Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- TLSModBot

- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: least useful rankings ever?
Lol. At 19% NY placement, GULC just edges out 'driving nails into your testicles'.buckiguy_sucks wrote:the TLS debate is finally over GULC>Cornell for NY
-
butlerraider1

- Posts: 349
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:53 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
Also, Touro > Yalebuckiguy_sucks wrote:the TLS debate is finally over GULC>Cornell for NY
- MKC

- Posts: 16246
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am
Re: least useful rankings ever?
University of Miami just edging out Stanford for 38th, neither of which holds a candle to New York Law School at second.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
WUSTL also conspicuously missing...MarkinKansasCity wrote:University of Miami just edging out Stanford for 38th, neither of which holds a candle to New York Law School at second.
- Winston1984

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
Even worse is having NYLS as number 2.KMart wrote:Any rankings with Fordham at the top of it is a bad list.
- ballcaps

- Posts: 527
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:20 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
ranking based on sheer number of grads placed in particular market, without regard for literally anything else?
yes i love it.
yes i love it.
- Gooner91

- Posts: 1377
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:34 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
I think they were second behind Harvard.ReasonableNprudent wrote:Wasn't there a ranking a few years ago published by Cooley that had themselves as #1, for having the largest collective library?
I'm not sure if it still exists or not. But, yeah, that one.
- ballcaps

- Posts: 527
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:20 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
http://abovethelaw.com/2011/02/latest-c ... ishonesty/Gooner91 wrote:I think they were second behind Harvard.ReasonableNprudent wrote:Wasn't there a ranking a few years ago published by Cooley that had themselves as #1, for having the largest collective library?
I'm not sure if it still exists or not. But, yeah, that one.
looks like they took down the original list
- reasonable person

- Posts: 130
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:06 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
This ranking was brought to you by John Spencer Treu, Esq., LL.M., C.P.A.
- reasonable person

- Posts: 130
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:06 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
Thanks to:scottidsntknow wrote:WUSTL also conspicuously missing...MarkinKansasCity wrote:University of Miami just edging out Stanford for 38th, neither of which holds a candle to New York Law School at second.
"This ranking takes the data provided by the law schools to the ABA and is limited to on the top 3 jurisdictions for employment per school and so a school that placed more students in each of three other jurisdictions than New York would not be included on this list, even if the school placed more students in New York than the law schools here listed. ↵"
That year, MO, IL, and DC probably surpassed NY for WUSTL, ND, and probably others.
- antiworldly

- Posts: 388
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:18 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
Although this list is laughable, it does have an underlying point. If you're looking at law school fully committed to working in a specific city/region a strong regional isn't the end of the world. There's a lot of T14 or bust logic on this site, but depending on your career goals and the money you're offered, a regional may work for you; it's a more complicated picture than just the US news ranking.
- Winston1984

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
There's very little T14 or bust logic on this site.antiworldly wrote:Although this list is laughable, it does have an underlying point. If you're looking at law school fully committed to working in a specific city/region a strong regional isn't the end of the world. There's a lot of T14 or bust logic on this site, but depending on your career goals and the money you're offered, a regional may work for you; it's a more complicated picture than just the US news ranking.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
And it does nothing to support the notion of going to a strong regional. It doesn't distinguish between any kinds of jobs, so in reality it's showing that if you go to NYLS you can get a job at Starbucks in Times Square.Winston1984 wrote:There's very little T14 or bust logic on this site.antiworldly wrote:Although this list is laughable, it does have an underlying point. If you're looking at law school fully committed to working in a specific city/region a strong regional isn't the end of the world. There's a lot of T14 or bust logic on this site, but depending on your career goals and the money you're offered, a regional may work for you; it's a more complicated picture than just the US news ranking.
- antiworldly

- Posts: 388
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:18 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
Certainly, and that's what makes this list laughable. I think there is a place, however, to look at where you want to end up and find a school that fits your needs for that market. If you go through the 'what are my chances' responses, the most parroted response is retake until you can get $ from a T14 and go there, which I feel is an ill-fitting solution to most people's goals.scottidsntknow wrote:And it does nothing to support the notion of going to a strong regional. It doesn't distinguish between any kinds of jobs, so in reality it's showing that if you go to NYLS you can get a job at Starbucks in Times Square.Winston1984 wrote:There's very little T14 or bust logic on this site.antiworldly wrote:Although this list is laughable, it does have an underlying point. If you're looking at law school fully committed to working in a specific city/region a strong regional isn't the end of the world. There's a lot of T14 or bust logic on this site, but depending on your career goals and the money you're offered, a regional may work for you; it's a more complicated picture than just the US news ranking.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: least useful rankings ever?
I question your reading comprehension skillz if this is your takeaway from reading chances/choices threadsantiworldly wrote:Certainly, and that's what makes this list laughable. I think there is a place, however, to look at where you want to end up and find a school that fits your needs for that market. If you go through the 'what are my chances' responses, the most parroted response is retake until you can get $ from a T14 and go there, which I feel is an ill-fitting solution to most people's goals.scottidsntknow wrote:And it does nothing to support the notion of going to a strong regional. It doesn't distinguish between any kinds of jobs, so in reality it's showing that if you go to NYLS you can get a job at Starbucks in Times Square.Winston1984 wrote:There's very little T14 or bust logic on this site.antiworldly wrote:Although this list is laughable, it does have an underlying point. If you're looking at law school fully committed to working in a specific city/region a strong regional isn't the end of the world. There's a lot of T14 or bust logic on this site, but depending on your career goals and the money you're offered, a regional may work for you; it's a more complicated picture than just the US news ranking.
- antiworldly

- Posts: 388
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:18 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
We seem to be agreeing on my main point of contention, and I'd encourage you to post more often in the chances/choices thread because at least this past year in most threads it has been a drumbeat ofBigZuck wrote: I question your reading comprehension skillz if this is your takeaway from reading chances/choices threads
middlebear wrote:Sit out and retake, and go to a T14.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: least useful rankings ever?
antiworldly wrote:I'd encourage you to post more often in the chances/choices thread
Ok, now I see that you're just trolling. Carry on.
- Winston1984

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
A lot of posters come in with lofty goals/want biglaw. Whenever a poster says they want to work at a small firm in their hometown, folks are fine endorsing the state flagship for a low cost.antiworldly wrote:Certainly, and that's what makes this list laughable. I think there is a place, however, to look at where you want to end up and find a school that fits your needs for that market. If you go through the 'what are my chances' responses, the most parroted response is retake until you can get $ from a T14 and go there, which I feel is an ill-fitting solution to most people's goals.scottidsntknow wrote:And it does nothing to support the notion of going to a strong regional. It doesn't distinguish between any kinds of jobs, so in reality it's showing that if you go to NYLS you can get a job at Starbucks in Times Square.Winston1984 wrote:There's very little T14 or bust logic on this site.antiworldly wrote:Although this list is laughable, it does have an underlying point. If you're looking at law school fully committed to working in a specific city/region a strong regional isn't the end of the world. There's a lot of T14 or bust logic on this site, but depending on your career goals and the money you're offered, a regional may work for you; it's a more complicated picture than just the US news ranking.
- antiworldly

- Posts: 388
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:18 pm
Re: least useful rankings ever?
Got to poke fun every once in a while! I am amazed though at the number of people with the T14 or bust mentality; with people going to law school without asking what/where next and choosing just on USNWR numbers.BigZuck wrote:antiworldly wrote:I'd encourage you to post more often in the chances/choices thread![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ok, now I see that you're just trolling. Carry on.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: least useful rankings ever?
As Winston said, there is no T14 or bust mentality, just a "Go where you can get the job you want" mentality. It's not TLS' fault if what a lot of posters want necessitates going to a T14. Just cuz you like to try and stick square pegs into round holes doesn't mean other people think that's a good idea.antiworldly wrote:Got to poke fun every once in a while! I am amazed though at the number of people with the T14 or bust mentality; with people going to law school without asking what/where next and choosing just on USNWR numbers.BigZuck wrote:antiworldly wrote:I'd encourage you to post more often in the chances/choices thread![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ok, now I see that you're just trolling. Carry on.
But this looks like a low-IQ contrarian schtick on your part so I'll stop harping on it