Just for shits n gigs: assuming 8 hours sleep (probably a dubious assumption here), that works out to once every 48 seconds. Sounds like this person would be perfect for law school.MikeSpivey wrote:Of similar relevance and FYI, and I'm not kidding, law schools can tell how many times a day you check their status checkers. I think someone at GULC last year checked over 1,200 one day.
How to stop clicking refresh on LSAT status page? Forum
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: How to stop clicking refresh on LSAT status page?
- el madrileno
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 8:12 pm
Re: How to stop clicking refresh on LSAT status page?
f5 can be addicting
- ms9
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: How to stop clicking refresh on LSAT status page?
I was wondering if someone would do the math. I suspect, as I think you do, that said poor applicant was up all night though.beachbum wrote:Just for shits n gigs: assuming 8 hours sleep (probably a dubious assumption here), that works out to once every 48 seconds. Sounds like this person would be perfect for law school.MikeSpivey wrote:Of similar relevance and FYI, and I'm not kidding, law schools can tell how many times a day you check their status checkers. I think someone at GULC last year checked over 1,200 one day.
-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: How to stop clicking refresh on LSAT status page?
Last edited by rebexness on Thu Jan 29, 2015 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- McAvoy
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: How to stop clicking refresh on LSAT status page?
I think this is what happened.rebexness wrote:Couldn't they have also created themselves some kind of auto check program? Otherwise that # is baffling.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ms9
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: How to stop clicking refresh on LSAT status page?
Here is a video of how I think that went downMcAvoy wrote:I think this is what happened.rebexness wrote:Couldn't they have also created themselves some kind of auto check program? Otherwise that # is baffling.
http://www.coolthings.com.au/duncan-the ... -bird.html