Re-take...again? Forum
-
ravel
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:07 am
-
Ti Malice
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Re: Re-take...again?
You're actually in great shape for H. How badly do you want Y?
A third retake with a 173+ would look better than what you have now, even if your reviewers at Y disfavor retakers to some degree.
A third retake with a 173+ would look better than what you have now, even if your reviewers at Y disfavor retakers to some degree.
-
ravel
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:07 am
-
Ti Malice
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Re: Re-take...again?
Well, if you're consistently testing at 175+ under realistic conditions, I'd say go for it.
Like I said, even if one or more of your reviewers isn't crazy about retakers, that ship has already sailed. Adding a >172 to your list would be better than what you have now, both because it would give you a better highest score, and because it would dispell concerns that the scores in the 160s were more representative and the 172 anomalous.
Like I said, even if one or more of your reviewers isn't crazy about retakers, that ship has already sailed. Adding a >172 to your list would be better than what you have now, both because it would give you a better highest score, and because it would dispell concerns that the scores in the 160s were more representative and the 172 anomalous.
-
Cradle6
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:02 pm
Re: Re-take...again?
Be forewarned that Yale dislikes retailers, and the admission process can be seemingly random.
Since you've already retaken, I don't see why not.
Maybe there's a way to mitigate retakes for Yale. I'm not sure.
Since you've already retaken, I don't see why not.
Maybe there's a way to mitigate retakes for Yale. I'm not sure.
