Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless... Forum
- Tennis Dude
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:00 am
Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
.
Last edited by Tennis Dude on Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Tennis Dude
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:00 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
.
Last edited by Tennis Dude on Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:24 am
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
Keep studying. Improving your score is largely based on how much time/work you put into studying. I'm about to retake the LSAT for a 3rd time. First PT score: 150. First LSAT score: 163. Second LSAT score: 165. Most people on these boards will tell you that it's possible to improve your score to the high 160's with enough work and smart study habits. I agree with them.
You already got a 162 on the LSAT, which shows that you are smart. Plenty of people take the LSAT 3 times. Buckle down, study smarter and retake.
You already got a 162 on the LSAT, which shows that you are smart. Plenty of people take the LSAT 3 times. Buckle down, study smarter and retake.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
The fact that you got a 162 on the real thing is a good sign, especially given that you have room to improve on games. Another 6-8 points should really be no problem if you put in the time.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- R. Jeeves
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
Don't treat the thing like an IQ test or something. The diag doesn't mean much. Plenty of people in the most selective law schools are there because they studied their asses off for the LSAT after a low diag.Tennis Dude wrote:Basically, my situation is this:
"Did anyone else start out with a really low diag and eventually get in the high 160s/170s and go to a good law school and become a lawyer?"
- malleus discentium
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:30 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
The LSAT is designed to predict exactly one thing: 1L grades. It does not reflect whether you'll be a good lawyer.
- mephistopheles
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:43 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
malleus discentium wrote:The LSAT is designed to predict exactly one thing: 1L grades. It does not reflect whether you'll be a good lawyer.
alright, bitter recipient of poor lsat score and poor grades and bad career prospects
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:02 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
I knew someone with a Diagnostic in the 140's who ended with a high 170's.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
What are you doing now? Law school all depends on what you are doing now and your alternative careers...
- Tennis Dude
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:00 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
.Moneytrees wrote:Keep studying. Improving your score is largely based on how much time/work you put into studying. I'm about to retake the LSAT for a 3rd time. First PT score: 150. First LSAT score: 163. Second LSAT score: 165. Most people on these boards will tell you that it's possible to improve your score to the high 160's with enough work and smart study habits. I agree with them.
You already got a 162 on the LSAT, which shows that you are smart. Plenty of people take the LSAT 3 times. Buckle down, study smarter and retake.
Last edited by Tennis Dude on Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Tennis Dude
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:00 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
.JohannDeMann wrote:What are you doing now? Law school all depends on what you are doing now and your alternative careers...
Last edited by Tennis Dude on Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- malleus discentium
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:30 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
Even a cursory glance at my profile would've been useful before saying such nasty and stupid things. Especially because I am, despite your attitude, correct. The LSAC says the test is designed is designed to measure skills that are considered essential for success in law school (not skills essential for being a good lawyer) and does studies to determine how the LSAT (and UGPA) predict 1L grades.mephistopheles wrote:alright, bitter recipient of poor lsat score and poor grades and bad career prospectsmalleus discentium wrote:The LSAT is designed to predict exactly one thing: 1L grades. It does not reflect whether you'll be a good lawyer.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
Definitely study up on the LSAT and get a couple more points. Law isn't glorious, but I'd roll the dice at UF/FSU before I continued down your path. I'm assuming you make less than $35k/yr.Tennis Dude wrote:Temping and substitute teaching.JohannDeMann wrote:What are you doing now? Law school all depends on what you are doing now and your alternative careers...
- mephistopheles
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:43 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
malleus discentium wrote:Even a cursory glance at my profile would've been useful before saying such nasty and stupid things. Especially because I am, despite your attitude, correct. The LSAC says the test is designed is designed to measure skills that are considered essential for success in law school (not skills essential for being a good lawyer) and does studies to determine how the LSAT (and UGPA) predict 1L grades.mephistopheles wrote:alright, bitter recipient of poor lsat score and poor grades and bad career prospectsmalleus discentium wrote:The LSAT is designed to predict exactly one thing: 1L grades. It does not reflect whether you'll be a good lawyer.
i'll put it like this, anyone who can't up their score in time for law school admissions is someone i would not want to be my attorney
- mephistopheles
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:43 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
and lol at being like, my profile says it so it must be true
- hillz
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:41 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
Not sure if you tried this when you studied previously, but perhaps studying with someone else (whether in person or virtually) would help calm your studying nerves. Sometimes shared experiences are easier. Just something to think about...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
Logic Games- Buy the Logic Game Bible. It's a great resource and will teach you how to nail the games. Keep drilling every chapter. I went from being pretty clueless on the games and only getting 14 points right on my first LSAT, to getting 18/23 on my second LSAT. I'm still improving and would like to get a perfect score on my 3rd try. Also, use 7Sage.com to get detailed explanations for every logic game.Tennis Dude wrote:Thank you for advice. What did you do to go from 150 to 165Moneytrees wrote:Keep studying. Improving your score is largely based on how much time/work you put into studying. I'm about to retake the LSAT for a 3rd time. First PT score: 150. First LSAT score: 163. Second LSAT score: 165. Most people on these boards will tell you that it's possible to improve your score to the high 160's with enough work and smart study habits. I agree with them.
You already got a 162 on the LSAT, which shows that you are smart. Plenty of people take the LSAT 3 times. Buckle down, study smarter and retake.
Logical Reasoning- This section is similar to the games in that you can master it by learning the basics to each question type and keep drilling until you know exactly how to approach each type. You could buy the LR Bible, which is pretty solid. I personally learned the most through my Blueprint study materials. Ultimately, it doesn't matter how you master each question type, as long as you do. This section seems daunting at first, until you realize there really aren't that many types of question types. If you study hard enough, you should be able to learn how to destroy this section.
Lastly, I personally believe that the best way to get better at Reading Comprehension is, aside from knowing the basics of the section, to read as much dense and complex material as you can. Buy the Economist and read it from front to back, trying to truly understand everything you read. Read your local newspaper every day. You will be amazed at how much easier it will be to process the information in Reading Comprehension passages once you are accustomed and comfortable with reading dense material. I practiced RC the least, and got a 24/27 on the June LSAT on this section. I mostly credit that score to all the Camus and Nietzsche I read while preparing for the LSAT.
- Tennis Dude
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:00 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
.JohannDeMann wrote:Definitely study up on the LSAT and get a couple more points. Law isn't glorious, but I'd roll the dice at UF/FSU before I continued down your path. I'm assuming you make less than $35k/yr.Tennis Dude wrote:Temping and substitute teaching.JohannDeMann wrote:What are you doing now? Law school all depends on what you are doing now and your alternative careers...
Last edited by Tennis Dude on Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- PotenC
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:13 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
Sounds like you didn't get into Harvard bro.mephistopheles wrote:and lol at being like, my profile says it so it must be true

- Tennis Dude
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:00 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
.
Last edited by Tennis Dude on Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
Apply to all and come back when you have money offers. I'd lean uf or fsu though. I mean really given your current situation, both of those schools even at sticker are better than your current sitch
Law school practice programs are largely shit. Uf and fsu lead to better outcomes.
Law school practice programs are largely shit. Uf and fsu lead to better outcomes.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
law school doesnt teach u how to b a lawyerTennis Dude wrote:no one has answered my question regarding going to Nova for the law school practice programs specifically. Any insight?
don't b swayed by any specific programs
go by job prospects, cost of attendance, and location
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
Yeah, don't go to Nova under any conditions.
Considering you're an in-state student, tuition at either FSU or UF is going to be fairly cheap. On top of that, even with your numbers, you'll probably get some scholarship money thrown in. If your parents/other family live near Tallahassee or Gainesville (and you can move back in with them) that makes the choice a lot easier. It's basically a coin flip between the two otherwise.
If you're absolutely sure you want to do PD, I don't see why you should go out of state to a better school. Retake the LSAT for increased scholarship money, but you'll do well at one of UF/FSU.
Considering you're an in-state student, tuition at either FSU or UF is going to be fairly cheap. On top of that, even with your numbers, you'll probably get some scholarship money thrown in. If your parents/other family live near Tallahassee or Gainesville (and you can move back in with them) that makes the choice a lot easier. It's basically a coin flip between the two otherwise.
If you're absolutely sure you want to do PD, I don't see why you should go out of state to a better school. Retake the LSAT for increased scholarship money, but you'll do well at one of UF/FSU.
- Tennis Dude
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:00 am
Re: Hey everybody, I am new here and somewhat clueless...
.twenty wrote:Yeah, don't go to Nova under any conditions.
Considering you're an in-state student, tuition at either FSU or UF is going to be fairly cheap. On top of that, even with your numbers, you'll probably get some scholarship money thrown in. If your parents/other family live near Tallahassee or Gainesville (and you can move back in with them) that makes the choice a lot easier. It's basically a coin flip between the two otherwise.
If you're absolutely sure you want to do PD, I don't see why you should go out of state to a better school. Retake the LSAT for increased scholarship money, but you'll do well at one of UF/FSU.
Last edited by Tennis Dude on Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login