Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT? Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply

User avatar
Ricky-Bobby

Silver
Posts: 1151
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by Ricky-Bobby » Wed Jun 11, 2014 7:19 pm

Knowing this forum, I predict a flood of choosing threads that contain the words "I'm not taking the LSAT. It's not even an option, so please don't even say 'take.' I want to go to this year. I really just need to start my life, and studying for the LSAT just doesn't work for me."

User avatar
McAvoy

Gold
Posts: 1584
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by McAvoy » Wed Jun 11, 2014 7:37 pm

Probably not going to get a merit scholarship though if you go this route. It might make sense for who have extremely pristine resumes and UG credentials who could get to HYS and not need a merit scholarship (because of need-based aid).

But yeah, I agree Ricky, this will spawn a big group of pseudo reverse-splitters who won't do a "take."

Is this the beginning of them phasing out the test?

User avatar
bombaysippin

Gold
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:11 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by bombaysippin » Wed Jun 11, 2014 9:21 pm

Of course they shouldn't. They're way too smart to take the test. duhhhh

notalobbyist

Bronze
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by notalobbyist » Thu Jun 12, 2014 1:06 am

Will T-14 seriously utilize this? Are they that shameless?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Nova

Platinum
Posts: 9102
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by Nova » Thu Jun 12, 2014 1:46 am

notalobbyist wrote:Will T-14 seriously utilize this? Are they that shameless?
Why wouldn't they?

User avatar
ScottRiqui

Gold
Posts: 3633
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by ScottRiqui » Thu Jun 12, 2014 1:59 am

I'm confused/clueless - what would even make a school want to fill up to 10% of its incoming class with students who didn't take the LSAT? And what could make an applicant so attractive even without an LSAT that a school would take them (other than my cynical first instinct of "Donor Dollars from Daddy"?)

09042014

Diamond
Posts: 18203
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by 09042014 » Thu Jun 12, 2014 2:00 am

ScottRiqui wrote:I'm confused/clueless - what would even make a school want to fill up to 10% of its incoming class with students who didn't take the LSAT? And what could make an applicant so attractive even without an LSAT that a school would take them (other than my cynical first instinct of "Donor Dollars from Daddy"?)
URMS

User avatar
Yea All Right

Silver
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:27 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by Yea All Right » Thu Jun 12, 2014 2:41 am

A school would want to use 10% of its class on people with no LSATs if those individuals can provide them with exceptionally high GPAs. Even the T14 schools need to have GPA medians as high as possible for USNWR.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Clearly

Gold
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by Clearly » Thu Jun 12, 2014 3:05 am

This is going to be used almost exclusively for urns, watch.

User avatar
McAvoy

Gold
Posts: 1584
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by McAvoy » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:59 am

This could be really good news for splitters though. If, by default, 10% of every class starts with 4.0s who have effectively 120 LSATs, you'd think that creates some extra wiggle room in that bottom 25% GPA percentile.

ETA: On a more cynical note, this could be a maneuver to increase class sizes.

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by Johann » Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:30 am

Will_McAvoy wrote:This could be really good news for splitters though. If, by default, 10% of every class starts with 4.0s who have effectively 120 LSATs, you'd think that creates some extra wiggle room in that bottom 25% GPA percentile.

ETA: On a more cynical note, this could be a maneuver to increase class sizes.
This is def to increase class sizes. What other reason could it be? Time to sucker more people into law who never considered the career long term enough to plan for LSAT and just want to apply on a whim.

User avatar
rahulg91

Bronze
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:30 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by rahulg91 » Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:33 am

Will_McAvoy wrote:This could be really good news for splitters though. If, by default, 10% of every class starts with 4.0s who have effectively 120 LSATs, you'd think that creates some extra wiggle room in that bottom 25% GPA percentile.

ETA: On a more cynical note, this could be a maneuver to increase class sizes.
For averaging purposes though, will those without an LSAT count towards the incoming class LSAT medians? How would this work?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Yea All Right

Silver
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:27 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by Yea All Right » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:51 pm

rahulg91 wrote:
For averaging purposes though, will those without an LSAT count towards the incoming class LSAT medians? How would this work?
Averaging, by definition, is completely separate from medians. Furthermore, most law schools release only their medians and not their averages.

I would guess that students without LSATs would 1) affect GPA medians only, or 2) not be counted toward any medians at all.

HaroldLee1982

New
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 6:18 am

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by HaroldLee1982 » Fri Jun 13, 2014 5:25 am

Is this good for splitters?

User avatar
Bildungsroman

Platinum
Posts: 5529
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by Bildungsroman » Fri Jun 13, 2014 6:19 am

That's a funny article. It's pretty bold for a Hamline Law professor to turn his nose up at the prospect of students getting legal jobs.

kcdc1

Silver
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am

Re: Should potential high GPA splitters not take the LSAT?

Post by kcdc1 » Fri Jun 13, 2014 7:32 am

Bildungsroman wrote:That's a funny article. It's pretty bold for a Hamline Law professor to turn his nose up at the prospect of students getting legal jobs.
It's more akin to the NCAA preventing players from getting paid.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”