UT Austin (20k) UC Irvine (40k) Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply

UT Austin (20k) vs UC Irvine (40k)

UT Austin (20k)
9
82%
UC Irvine (40k)
2
18%
 
Total votes: 11

Tjerr4443

New
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 7:41 pm

UT Austin (20k) UC Irvine (40k)

Post by Tjerr4443 » Wed May 07, 2014 7:54 pm

Amounts listed are the per year scholarship awards.

URM, 161, 3.5.

These are the results of my retake.

From California, but really enjoyed my visits to Texas and wouldn't mind practicing in the area after graduation.

I'm having a difficult time coming to a decision but found this site immensely useful throughout my application cycle so I thought I might ask.

User avatar
cotiger

Gold
Posts: 1648
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: UT Austin (20k) UC Irvine (40k)

Post by cotiger » Wed May 07, 2014 7:57 pm

What are your debt levels upon graduation?

User avatar
SFrost

Bronze
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:32 pm

Re: UT Austin (20k) UC Irvine (40k)

Post by SFrost » Wed May 07, 2014 8:38 pm

For one, Texas is king of a relatively strong market. Irvine is the ugly stepchild of a saturated market.

The employment figures back that up:

http://www.lstscorereports.com/compare/texas/irvine/

Secondly, nobody cares about the scholarship size. Cost of attendance matters. You can live in Texas cheaper than California, as a general rule. Texas is also slightly cheaper on tuition such that you might be looking at the same overall scholarship.

Of course none of that really matters. They're both regional schools. If you want to work in Texas, Texas is one of the best schools for that. If you want to work in California, retake, probably.

Hrun

New
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:51 pm

Re: UT Austin (20k) UC Irvine (40k)

Post by Hrun » Wed May 07, 2014 8:50 pm

SFrost wrote:For one, Texas is king of a relatively strong market. Irvine is the ugly stepchild of a saturated market.

The employment figures back that up:

http://www.lstscorereports.com/compare/texas/irvine/

Secondly, nobody cares about the scholarship size. Cost of attendance matters. You can live in Texas cheaper than California, as a general rule. Texas is also slightly cheaper on tuition such that you might be looking at the same overall scholarship.

Of course none of that really matters. They're both regional schools. If you want to work in Texas, Texas is one of the best schools for that. If you want to work in California, retake, probably.
Since OP is from Cali, he's only paying like 5,000 a year in tuition and fees at Irvine.

OP, what is it you want to do? BigLaw, PI, etc.? How many times have you taken the LSAT? Any ties to Texas? You need to answer these types of questions before people can give you accurate advice.

User avatar
phillywc

Gold
Posts: 3448
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am

Re: UT Austin (20k) UC Irvine (40k)

Post by phillywc » Wed May 07, 2014 11:21 pm

Wrong forum, but at least answer these questions:

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=206299

User avatar
twenty

Gold
Posts: 3189
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm

Re: UT Austin (20k) UC Irvine (40k)

Post by twenty » Thu May 08, 2014 1:12 am

Invariably, you should probably retake the LSAT. An AA URM with a 3.5 and even a 164+ LSAT would be in a pretty good spot in terms of money from the T14. :)

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”