Edited: Analysis from elterrible and squeebz, stats geniuses - thanks to both of you for doing this
WL included, 2009-2010, probit+logit regression
2006-2013, WL excluded, bad LSN data points excluded, logit regressionsqueebz wrote:Schools w/ No Statistical Difference Between Retakers and Non-Retakers - Penn, GULC, Northwestern, UVA, Yale, Michigan, and Duke
Schools Where Retakers Faired Worse - Columbia, Berkeley, Cornell, NYU, Harvard, Stanford, and Chicago
Edited: Instead of listing my conclusions, I'm providing images for each of the T14 which help you to reach your own conclusions on the significances of any difference. In these graphs, red indicates that the acceptance rate for retakers is lower; yellow indicates no difference; and green indicates that retakers have a greater acceptance rate. Note that yellow in the lower part of the graph is possibly attributable to the fact that no one in that range is getting in. (data 2008-2012)elterrible78 wrote:Quick and dirty:
Controlling for LSAT, GPA, URM, ED (where applicable), and how early the app was sent in, these are the results:
Boalt - Retakers are 19% less likely to be admitted.
Cornell - Retakers are 26% less likely to be admitted.
Harvard - Retakers are 31% less likely to be admitted.
NYU - Retakers are 62% less likely to be admitted (not a typo).
Stanford - Retakers are 40% less likely to be admitted.
It doesn't matter a bit at the rest of the T14.
All the usual LSN-related caveats apply to this.
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--