I know this topic has been addressed in several topics, but I haven't seen anyone address my particular situation. I have a small LSAT increase from taking it in Oct. 2010 and then in June 2012 (166-169 with a cancel in between in Dec. 2010). A 169 is on the far end of the band that LSAC gives out with every score, and I'm wondering if it's more likely that schools will average my score especially at HYSCCN since it's not exactly a big jump. I know a lot of this will be sepeculative, but I'd love to hear more thoughts.
I'm also not keen on writing an addendum for these scores.
Averaging small LSAT gains Forum
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Averaging small LSAT gains
Nah. And the score bands are irrelevant.
- TopHatToad
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:09 pm
Re: Averaging small LSAT gains
The general consensus is that almost no schools average anymore, exceptions being to Y, S and B who do the holistic thing. That being said, unless you're URM, crazy high gpa or a nobel laureate, HYSCCN is not going to bite even on a 169. Several T14s will, though.
- RSterling
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Averaging small LSAT gains
I guess the only reason I brought up the bands is because I think it's Berkeley that says something on their site about how there is no statistical significance of a gain or loss of a few points. I wasn't sure if that was something other schools considered as well when looking at scores.soj wrote:Nah. And the score bands are irrelevant.
My GPA is 4.0+, so I'm applying to HS down and I'm hoping that I can nab at least a bite from one of CCN. S is a long shot, but I have some pretty strong targeted recs and I think an above average PS, so who knows. But I agree with you that a 169 is not exactly ideal.TopHatToad wrote:The general consensus is that almost no schools average anymore, exceptions being to Y, S and B who do the holistic thing. That being said, unless you're URM, crazy high gpa or a nobel laureate, HYSCCN is not going to bite even on a 169. Several T14s will, though.
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Averaging small LSAT gains
Stanford, Chicago, and NYU aren't out of the picture.
They say this because a big chunk of Berkeley's target students are students with mid- to high-160s who might have better options if they retook and broke the 170s.RSterling wrote:I guess the only reason I brought up the bands is because I think it's Berkeley that says something on their site about how there is no statistical significance of a gain or loss of a few points. I wasn't sure if that was something other schools considered as well when looking at scores.soj wrote:Nah. And the score bands are irrelevant.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:07 am
Re: Averaging small LSAT gains
Don't count yourself out, my brother didn't break 170 (169 like you) and he got into Harvard. It might not be the first round, you might get wait-listed, or
actually get denied. But I think it's dumb to count yourself out. See if you can get any sort of fee waiver, or try to get fee waivers for every other school you're applying to besides the ones that don't give them. That way, you're not having trouble paying for the applications.
As cheesy as it sound, Not applying is an instant deny. Swallow your pride and do it, but be ok with either outcome.
Also, a few of my brother's classmates managed to transfer in from regional TTs and TTTs. It's an option as well; just be sure you'd be happy enough to stay at the school you attend for 1L in case things don't go as well as planned.
Good luck!

As cheesy as it sound, Not applying is an instant deny. Swallow your pride and do it, but be ok with either outcome.
Also, a few of my brother's classmates managed to transfer in from regional TTs and TTTs. It's an option as well; just be sure you'd be happy enough to stay at the school you attend for 1L in case things don't go as well as planned.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login