Every region has its own prestigious schools that no one else gives a shit about. Carleton and Macalaster here in MN, for example.Mike12188 wrote:I had to google both. This thread is stupid but I do enjoy when people argue about schools being "prestigious" that fall outside the widely known prestigious schools.
Edit: In terms of the William Patterson and UMass-Amherst prestige that is
Future prestige poll Forum
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
- emptyflare
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:36 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Rice for Texas, or is it more nationally known?minnbills wrote:Every region has its own prestigious schools that no one else gives a shit about. Carleton and Macalaster here in MN, for example.Mike12188 wrote:I had to google both. This thread is stupid but I do enjoy when people argue about schools being "prestigious" that fall outside the widely known prestigious schools.
Edit: In terms of the William Patterson and UMass-Amherst prestige that is
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Future prestige poll
I lol'edMike12188 wrote:I had to google both. This thread is stupid but I do enjoy when people argue about schools being "prestigious" that fall outside the widely known prestigious schools.
Edit: In terms of the William Patterson and UMass-Amherst prestige that is
-
- Posts: 1902
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Who gives a shit. See TITCRoregon000 wrote:Academic question: It seems that there is a west coast shift going on in our country ( Silicon Valley etc.) Right now I feel that Harvard still is the preeminent name in education, but I am curious if people think that this will change within a decade. Will Stanford become the new big name or is Harvard so entrenched that it will always be the place to be?
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Are you on crack?thelawguy wrote:As a prototypical New Englander I have argue that many people would put Williams or Amherst ahead of or at least equal to HYSP. For the size of theses schools they simply dominate Wall Street.
On wall street they're no better represented than any of dozens of colleges that are not Ivys
Blatant Amherst trolling....
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Harvard is no more entrenched than Oxford.oregon000 wrote:Academic question: It seems that there is a west coast shift going on in our country ( Silicon Valley etc.) Right now I feel that Harvard still is the preeminent name in education, but I am curious if people think that this will change within a decade. Will Stanford become the new big name or is Harvard so entrenched that it will always be the place to be?
Stanford has a long way to go before it can truly rival Harvard
(hell, outside of the world of legal academia, Princeton carries more prestige as a law school than Stanford does)
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Hathelawguy wrote:As a prototypical New Englander I have argue that many people would put Williams or Amherst ahead of or at least equal to HYSP. For the size of theses schools they simply dominate Wall Street.
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
I always wondered how Kofi Annan ended up there.minnbills wrote:Every region has its own prestigious schools that no one else gives a shit about. Carleton and Macalaster here in MN, for example.
- ScrabbleChamp
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:09 am
Re: Future prestige poll
Last time I went through Ulrichs, they had about 5 different styles of the "Harvard is the Michigan of the East" shirts... They are still alive and well.TLS_noobie wrote:--ImageRemoved--JoeMo wrote:Me wants.TLS_noobie wrote:
I'm guessing Ulrichs doesn't sell it anymore (it was around 6 or so years ago) but you used to be able to buy a T-Shirt that says Harvard: The Michigan of the East ...and the "legend" goes that it is in response to Harvard calling Michigan the Harvard of the West. (not sure if the tshirt still exists though)
Also, it apparently stems from JFK himself calling Harvard "The Michigan of the East" during some address on the union steps.
Maybe you can still find it somewhere on campus. Though, it saddens me that Michigan Book & Supply is no longer with us
I didn't know that was where it came from, it was one of those things that you ask the store clerk about and the story changes with the person you ask haha.
- TLS_noobie
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:17 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
ScrabbleChamp wrote:Last time I went through Ulrichs, they had about 5 different styles of the "Harvard is the Michigan of the East" shirts... They are still alive and well.TLS_noobie wrote:--ImageRemoved--JoeMo wrote:Me wants.TLS_noobie wrote:
I'm guessing Ulrichs doesn't sell it anymore (it was around 6 or so years ago) but you used to be able to buy a T-Shirt that says Harvard: The Michigan of the East ...and the "legend" goes that it is in response to Harvard calling Michigan the Harvard of the West. (not sure if the tshirt still exists though)
Also, it apparently stems from JFK himself calling Harvard "The Michigan of the East" during some address on the union steps.
Maybe you can still find it somewhere on campus. Though, it saddens me that Michigan Book & Supply is no longer with us
I didn't know that was where it came from, it was one of those things that you ask the store clerk about and the story changes with the person you ask haha.
- Perdevise
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:45 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Wikipedia says:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/9109/harvard ... ublic.aspx
It is a nine year old poll. Stanford actually ties with Yale amongst all Americans. 2 points separate Stanford from Harvard amongst post-graduates. Grain of salt, etc.
Source:A 2003 Gallup poll, which asked about the best colleges in the U.S., found that Stanford is the second-most prestigious university (behind Harvard) in the eyes of the general American public and roughly equal in prestige to Harvard among college-educated people.[97]
http://www.gallup.com/poll/9109/harvard ... ublic.aspx
It is a nine year old poll. Stanford actually ties with Yale amongst all Americans. 2 points separate Stanford from Harvard amongst post-graduates. Grain of salt, etc.
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Gallup poll= shameless Stanford trolling.
- Perdevise
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:45 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Poll seems to confirm that most people place Harvard above Stanford (even in the Western US).stillwater wrote:Gallup poll= shameless Stanford trolling.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
I live on the East coast and many people out here don't think of Stanford as being anywhere close to the same level as the Ivy League schools (since we hear next to nothing about the school or its grads). I would say people don't think of it any different than something like Notre Dame (i.e. a solid school with a name that people recognize, but don't know all that much about aside from a few face-value things). Whereas Harvard is so synonymous with excellence that its almost colloquial.
- TLS_noobie
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:17 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Credited. Same in the Midwest. But, we need to define colloquial/layperson if we are to talk about lay-prestige obviously. Different regions have different cultures, whereas among the blue-collar, industrial worker in the Midwest, Harvard is the be all end all of snobbery, but among engineers across the globe Stanford is obviously up there.kaiser wrote:I live on the East coast and many people out here don't think of Stanford as being anywhere close to the same level as the Ivy League schools (since we hear next to nothing about the school or its grads). I would say people don't think of it any different than something like Notre Dame (i.e. a solid school with a name that people recognize, but don't know all that much about aside from a few face-value things). Whereas Harvard is so synonymous with excellence that its almost colloquial.
- AntipodeanPhil
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:02 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
What's most interesting about that poll, imo, is how well the large state schools do. I guess people in Ohio / alumni of OSU vote for OSU; people in Texas / alumni of UT vote for UT; et cetera. Of course, whether they do that because they actually believe it or because they just want to see their local school / alma mater ranked higher is another question.Perdevise wrote:http://www.gallup.com/poll/9109/harvard ... ublic.aspx
It is a nine year old poll. Stanford actually ties with Yale amongst all Americans. 2 points separate Stanford from Harvard amongst post-graduates. Grain of salt, etc.
I'm surprised that Dartmouth is not on the list, but not at all surprised to see Caltech and WUSTL missing.
-
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:44 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
I'm at rice now. Also Im asianemptyflare wrote:Rice for Texas, or is it more nationally known?minnbills wrote:Every region has its own prestigious schools that no one else gives a shit about. Carleton and Macalaster here in MN, for example.Mike12188 wrote:I had to google both. This thread is stupid but I do enjoy when people argue about schools being "prestigious" that fall outside the widely known prestigious schools.
Edit: In terms of the William Patterson and UMass-Amherst prestige that is
From FL originally, when i told my friends i was going there they stared at me and said "is that some type of asian school"
...Rice is a great academic school, I would argue on par or surpassing the lower ivies, unfortunately we are too freaking small and young to get our name out. So basically I think you are kinda right in that we lack lay prestige as compared to our ranking, although I would note that Rice is far better than Carleton, Macalaster and that it doesnt quite fall into the "Every region has its own prestigious schools that no one else gives a shit about"
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
The straitjacket of perspective.thederangedwang wrote:I'm at rice now. Also Im asianemptyflare wrote:Rice for Texas, or is it more nationally known?minnbills wrote:Every region has its own prestigious schools that no one else gives a shit about. Carleton and Macalaster here in MN, for example.Mike12188 wrote:I had to google both. This thread is stupid but I do enjoy when people argue about schools being "prestigious" that fall outside the widely known prestigious schools.
Edit: In terms of the William Patterson and UMass-Amherst prestige that is
From FL originally, when i told my friends i was going there they stared at me and said "is that some type of asian school"
...Rice is a great academic school, I would argue on par or surpassing the lower ivies, unfortunately we are too freaking small and young to get our name out. So basically I think you are kinda right in that we lack lay prestige as compared to our ranking, although I would note that Rice is far better than Carleton, Macalaster and that it doesnt quite fall into the "Every region has its own prestigious schools that no one else gives a shit about"
-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Even among the "academics" and "elites" that I know on the east coast, Harvard is still the gold standard. I mean, they of course know that Stanford is an excellent school, just as they are the select few out here who don't think U. Chicago is a state school in Illinois. But that doesn't mean they would ever equate it with the truly elite few schools out here on the east cast. We just don't have the day to day exposure to the school or its graduates to ever think of it like we think of Harvard, Princeton, Yale, etc.TLS_noobie wrote:Credited. Same in the Midwest. But, we need to define colloquial/layperson if we are to talk about lay-prestige obviously. Different regions have different cultures, whereas among the blue-collar, industrial worker in the Midwest, Harvard is the be all end all of snobbery, but among engineers across the globe Stanford is obviously up there.kaiser wrote:I live on the East coast and many people out here don't think of Stanford as being anywhere close to the same level as the Ivy League schools (since we hear next to nothing about the school or its grads). I would say people don't think of it any different than something like Notre Dame (i.e. a solid school with a name that people recognize, but don't know all that much about aside from a few face-value things). Whereas Harvard is so synonymous with excellence that its almost colloquial.
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Future prestige poll
I came on here to say that it was because they actually believed that, but after looking at it I think its just people wanting to see their local school / alma mater highly ranked.AntipodeanPhil wrote:What's most interesting about that poll, imo, is how well the large state schools do. I guess people in Ohio / alumni of OSU vote for OSU; people in Texas / alumni of UT vote for UT; et cetera. Of course, whether they do that because they actually believe it or because they just want to see their local school / alma mater ranked higher is another question.Perdevise wrote:http://www.gallup.com/poll/9109/harvard ... ublic.aspx
It is a nine year old poll. Stanford actually ties with Yale amongst all Americans. 2 points separate Stanford from Harvard amongst post-graduates. Grain of salt, etc.
I'm surprised that Dartmouth is not on the list, but not at all surprised to see Caltech and WUSTL missing.
The reason for this change of opinion was originally I thought it had people rank their "top 10" or "top 5" schools, and yea.. people really do vastly over-rank their big state schools
But seeing that they only had to say their top 2, I'm guessing most people realistically know that Ohio State isn't 1 of the 2 best schools in the nation
- AntipodeanPhil
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:02 pm
Re: Future prestige poll
Yeah, I think the ranking is a little distorted by the fact that they only asked each person to name the best school. I think a lot of schools that are second or third ranked in their region (MIT, Columbia, et cetera) would do a lot better if the respondents were asked to list a top 10.ThreeRivers wrote:I came on here to say that it was because they actually believed that, but after looking at it I think its just people wanting to see their local school / alma mater highly ranked.
The reason for this change of opinion was originally I thought it had people rank their "top 10" or "top 5" schools, and yea.. people really do vastly over-rank their big state schools
But seeing that they only had to say their top 2, I'm guessing most people realistically know that Ohio State isn't 1 of the 2 best schools in the nation
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Future prestige poll
Anyways, lay prestige (even among the educated) is completely pointless other than to give your mom something to brag about / to impress some girl in a bar.
If I went to duquesne (a local TTTT with SHIT employment), I'd be more impressive to these individuals... o well
Lay prestige is a weird thing that either develops through:
1. Sports (I originally knew as a young sports obsessed lad that Texas, Duke, USC, Vandy, ND were pretty good institutions just through talking about / watching sports).
Convos such as "yea, Vanderbilt has it tougher in the SEC cause they care about academics make me think "oooo, Vandy's a good school!"
It can have the opposite effect (I originally though Mia and pretty much every school in the SEC sucked).
2. Media / ingrained in our culture. Wheres the smart kid from, where do presidents come from, what does your gram say when she brags that you're so bright 1 day you can go to "_______."
3. Your personal ties / legacy. This is where state schools come in. Your aunt, uncle, and mother all went to ____ and are very proud of it... what a great school! The rich lawyer across the street went to, _____ what a great school. Where do most of the smarter kids in your grade go to? Etc
None of it matters much though
If I went to duquesne (a local TTTT with SHIT employment), I'd be more impressive to these individuals... o well
Lay prestige is a weird thing that either develops through:
1. Sports (I originally knew as a young sports obsessed lad that Texas, Duke, USC, Vandy, ND were pretty good institutions just through talking about / watching sports).
Convos such as "yea, Vanderbilt has it tougher in the SEC cause they care about academics make me think "oooo, Vandy's a good school!"
It can have the opposite effect (I originally though Mia and pretty much every school in the SEC sucked).
2. Media / ingrained in our culture. Wheres the smart kid from, where do presidents come from, what does your gram say when she brags that you're so bright 1 day you can go to "_______."
3. Your personal ties / legacy. This is where state schools come in. Your aunt, uncle, and mother all went to ____ and are very proud of it... what a great school! The rich lawyer across the street went to, _____ what a great school. Where do most of the smarter kids in your grade go to? Etc
None of it matters much though
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Future prestige poll
agreeAntipodeanPhil wrote:Yeah, I think the ranking is a little distorted by the fact that they only asked each person to name the best school. I think a lot of schools that are second or third ranked in their region (MIT, Columbia, et cetera) would do a lot better if the respondents were asked to list a top 10.ThreeRivers wrote:I came on here to say that it was because they actually believed that, but after looking at it I think its just people wanting to see their local school / alma mater highly ranked.
The reason for this change of opinion was originally I thought it had people rank their "top 10" or "top 5" schools, and yea.. people really do vastly over-rank their big state schools
But seeing that they only had to say their top 2, I'm guessing most people realistically know that Ohio State isn't 1 of the 2 best schools in the nation
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Future prestige poll
Did you post this in some other thread previously? The part about lay prestige develops through Sports, Media, Ties. Because if you didn't, I swear I've read this before and I don't like deja vu.ThreeRivers wrote:Anyways, lay prestige (even among the educated) is completely pointless other than to give your mom something to brag about / to impress some girl in a bar.
If I went to duquesne (a local TTTT with SHIT employment), I'd be more impressive to these individuals... o well
Lay prestige is a weird thing that either develops through:
1. Sports (I originally knew as a young sports obsessed lad that Texas, Duke, USC, Vandy, ND were pretty good institutions just through talking about / watching sports).
Convos such as "yea, Vanderbilt has it tougher in the SEC cause they care about academics make me think "oooo, Vandy's a good school!"
It can have the opposite effect (I originally though Mia and pretty much every school in the SEC sucked).
2. Media / ingrained in our culture. Wheres the smart kid from, where do presidents come from, what does your gram say when she brags that you're so bright 1 day you can go to "_______."
3. Your personal ties / legacy. This is where state schools come in. Your aunt, uncle, and mother all went to ____ and are very proud of it... what a great school! The rich lawyer across the street went to, _____ what a great school. Where do most of the smarter kids in your grade go to? Etc
None of it matters much though
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Future prestige poll
Lol, nopeJoeMo wrote:Did you post this in some other thread previously? The part about lay prestige develops through Sports, Media, Ties. Because if you didn't, I swear I've read this before and I don't like deja vu.ThreeRivers wrote:Anyways, lay prestige (even among the educated) is completely pointless other than to give your mom something to brag about / to impress some girl in a bar.
If I went to duquesne (a local TTTT with SHIT employment), I'd be more impressive to these individuals... o well
Lay prestige is a weird thing that either develops through:
1. Sports (I originally knew as a young sports obsessed lad that Texas, Duke, USC, Vandy, ND were pretty good institutions just through talking about / watching sports).
Convos such as "yea, Vanderbilt has it tougher in the SEC cause they care about academics make me think "oooo, Vandy's a good school!"
It can have the opposite effect (I originally though Mia and pretty much every school in the SEC sucked).
2. Media / ingrained in our culture. Wheres the smart kid from, where do presidents come from, what does your gram say when she brags that you're so bright 1 day you can go to "_______."
3. Your personal ties / legacy. This is where state schools come in. Your aunt, uncle, and mother all went to ____ and are very proud of it... what a great school! The rich lawyer across the street went to, _____ what a great school. Where do most of the smarter kids in your grade go to? Etc
None of it matters much though
(I actually just used search function on my self to make sure I haven't become an old man who just repeats certain phrases retake UVA)
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login