
Santa Clara (Early decision)
U of Pacific McGeorge
UC Hastings (LEOP)
UC San Diego
UC Berkeley (expecting a nice rejection letter lol)
Loyola Law School
Tulane
Washington and Lee
U of Miami
Let me know where you've applied

What you need to do is withdraw all of those applications. Take a year off and study HARD to add 12 or 13 points to your LSAT. If you do that, you could be at Harvard a year from now. If you only add 6, you're still probably in at Cornell or Georgetown. That's not a lot of work to drastically change the course of the rest of your life. You sound like a very nice person, so please don't waste your GPA and minority status on any (excluding Berkeley, of course) of the schools you've applied to. I would kill for that GPA, please don't waste it.bessmarvin89 wrote:GPA 3.9/ biology LSAT: 156, Immigrant, Minority
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Why would you expect to be rejected? Plenty of people within your range have made it into Boalt with those numbers. Add on your URM bonus and you're pretty competitivebessmarvin89 wrote: UC Berkeley (expecting a nice rejection letter lol)
At least for undegrad, Asian status hurts you, according to a study by a Princeton Professor. Dings you about 50 points, if I remember correctly.apollo2015 wrote:Am I correct in assuming that the OP is not a URM-type minority? (URM being black, native american, or hispanic. Asians are pretty much considered to be white in terms of admissions.)
North,North wrote:I understand. If I knew you personally, though, I'm not sure that I'd let you off the hook even with that. As for me, I'm finishing up my senior year and taking the advice you took: I'm taking next year off to learn how to blow out the LSAT. Applications are a ways off for me. If I get my 17X, I'm shooting for lower T-14.
Why no UC Davis, Los Angeles, or USC? You have a shot at all of them.
Guys, This varies according to school, like Tulane for example has a low Asian pacific student % and they do consider Asians minority. It all depends on school. Being a female helps89vision wrote:At least for undegrad, Asian status hurts you, according to a study by a Princeton Professor. Dings you about 50 points, if I remember correctly.apollo2015 wrote:Am I correct in assuming that the OP is not a URM-type minority? (URM being black, native american, or hispanic. Asians are pretty much considered to be white in terms of admissions.)
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
You really think so? I'm not in their 25th percentiles and it worries the hell out of me. Where are you applying?picklebarrel wrote:I would also apply to USC and UCLA. USC is expensive, but pretty generous with scholarships (with no stipulations). You have a shot at both schools.
Because I'm like 12 points off their 25th percentiles and because I don't like to have expectations only to be crushed down. Berkeley is my DREAM school. I worked so hard on my personal statement for Berkeley, I idenitified a specific program at Berkeley which identifies people like me. I hope they atleast consider me. Thanks for your encouragement. My file is currently under review since Nov 10th, I'll keep you posted. Where have you applied?Worker and Parasite wrote:Why would you expect to be rejected? Plenty of people within your range have made it into Boalt with those numbers. Add on your URM bonus and you're pretty competitivebessmarvin89 wrote: UC Berkeley (expecting a nice rejection letter lol)
Your GPA kills it and UCB is big into GPA and little into LSAT. I think the Dean wrote a post regarding their dismay of the LSAT and how they didn't like how one test would be an indicator of success. I wouldn't look at simply medians, check the graphs on LSN for their trends.bessmarvin89 wrote:Because I'm like 12 points off their 25th percentiles and because I don't like to have expectations only to be crushed down. Berkeley is my DREAM school. I worked so hard on my personal statement for Berkeley, I idenitified a specific program at Berkeley which identifies people like me. I hope they atleast consider me. Thanks for your encouragement. My file is currently under review since Nov 10th, I'll keep you posted. Where have you applied?Worker and Parasite wrote:Why would you expect to be rejected? Plenty of people within your range have made it into Boalt with those numbers. Add on your URM bonus and you're pretty competitivebessmarvin89 wrote: UC Berkeley (expecting a nice rejection letter lol)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Here's a reference to the study. You can find the actual study online as well.bessmarvin89 wrote:Guys, This varies according to school, like Tulane for example has a low Asian pacific student % and they do consider Asians minority. It all depends on school. Being a female helps89vision wrote:At least for undegrad, Asian status hurts you, according to a study by a Princeton Professor. Dings you about 50 points, if I remember correctly.apollo2015 wrote:Am I correct in assuming that the OP is not a URM-type minority? (URM being black, native american, or hispanic. Asians are pretty much considered to be white in terms of admissions.)and being broke really helps !
The lowest LSAT I saw on TLS Stats was a 163. Not to be a buzzkill or anything lol, but I think OP has more reasonably assessed his odds.Worker and Parasite wrote:Why would you expect to be rejected? Plenty of people within your range have made it into Boalt with those numbers. Add on your URM bonus and you're pretty competitivebessmarvin89 wrote: UC Berkeley (expecting a nice rejection letter lol)
?bobbyh1919 wrote:The lowest LSAT I saw on TLS Stats was a 163. Not to be a buzzkill or anything lol, but I think OP has more reasonably assessed his odds.Worker and Parasite wrote:Why would you expect to be rejected? Plenty of people within your range have made it into Boalt with those numbers. Add on your URM bonus and you're pretty competitivebessmarvin89 wrote: UC Berkeley (expecting a nice rejection letter lol)
Best of luck to you.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Worker and Parasite wrote:?bobbyh1919 wrote:The lowest LSAT I saw on TLS Stats was a 163. Not to be a buzzkill or anything lol, but I think OP has more reasonably assessed his odds.Worker and Parasite wrote:Why would you expect to be rejected? Plenty of people within your range have made it into Boalt with those numbers. Add on your URM bonus and you're pretty competitivebessmarvin89 wrote: UC Berkeley (expecting a nice rejection letter lol)
Best of luck to you.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Dream2011/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/iamthewalrus/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/adidas989/jd
These are all URM folk though. I agree that it's hard but not unreasonable.
I'm a 1L who should be studying, but I definitely outperformed my numbers last year. I had a 3.9/160 and I'm not a URM, so I don't think you should let the 25th percentiles get to you. Your GPA is really good and some schools may be looking for higher GPAs.bessmarvin89 wrote:You really think so? I'm not in their 25th percentiles and it worries the hell out of me. Where are you applying?picklebarrel wrote:I would also apply to USC and UCLA. USC is expensive, but pretty generous with scholarships (with no stipulations). You have a shot at both schools.
You are a URM with a 3.9 GPA. With a little luck and a thoughtful application, UCLA or USC might bite. You look pretty good at Davis if you submit quickly. Please, send them applications while it's still early-ish in the cycle.bessmarvin89 wrote:Because I'm like 12 points off their 25th percentiles and because I don't like to have expectations only to be crushed down.
Top 15 and I graduated an year early cum laude. Not showing off since I already admitted I was stupid considering my lsat score but just saying so you can help me reassess my odds.dreakol wrote:what was your UG?
top 10? top 20? top 50? you get the point.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login