Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride Forum
- Marlin88
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:03 pm
Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
If I'm wanting to live in the Dallas area following law school (hopefully doing business/corporate law) what do you think would be the better choice? I haven't heard back from either school yet so the "~sticker vs. full ride" isn't absolute, just a guess based on last year's LSN applicants. My numbers: 168, 4.0, White Male, Non-TX Resident
My dilemma is that I really want to go to a top school, but I don't want to be saddled down with debt for 10+ years after law school. I have no debt from undergrad so I don't really know what it is like to have loads of debt after graduation, but I have heard horror stories about how awful it is paying off student loans. I've talked to some people who have taken out huge loans to go to top schools who say that it was worth it, and others who say that it wasn't worth the money. Can anyone speak to this, maybe from experience paying for undergrad or if there are some post-law school lurkers on here that have experience paying back loans from law school, in hindsight do you think it was a good or bad decision?
Right now I'm leaning towards UT if I'm accepted. Last year most people with 168, 3.8+'s got $21,000 from UT, but that would still mean I'd have to pay $130,000 to go there and because of the budget crisis they are having this year I might not even get any money at all.
Any advice is appreciated. Thanks.
My dilemma is that I really want to go to a top school, but I don't want to be saddled down with debt for 10+ years after law school. I have no debt from undergrad so I don't really know what it is like to have loads of debt after graduation, but I have heard horror stories about how awful it is paying off student loans. I've talked to some people who have taken out huge loans to go to top schools who say that it was worth it, and others who say that it wasn't worth the money. Can anyone speak to this, maybe from experience paying for undergrad or if there are some post-law school lurkers on here that have experience paying back loans from law school, in hindsight do you think it was a good or bad decision?
Right now I'm leaning towards UT if I'm accepted. Last year most people with 168, 3.8+'s got $21,000 from UT, but that would still mean I'd have to pay $130,000 to go there and because of the budget crisis they are having this year I might not even get any money at all.
Any advice is appreciated. Thanks.
- emkay625
- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
I would choose Texas if it were me.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
If you don't do well at SMU and miss a six figure job, cost of attendance loans alone may well take 10 years to pay off anyway.
-
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:40 am
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
I hate to ask this, but possibility of a retake?
- Marlin88
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:03 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
No possibility of a retake, I'm out of the country until after the December LSAT and I have too much going on before the February test and I definitely want to start law school next fall.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- holdencaulfield
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:12 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
I had almost this exact choice. Went to SMU and loved it.
- johansantana21
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
emkay625 wrote:I would choose Texas if it were me.
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
johansantana21 wrote:emkay625 wrote:I would choose Texas if it were me.
- Gail
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:11 am
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
[waits for people to jump in and tell you to retake]
Anyways. You won't be getting a full-ride to SMU, I don't think that SMU really does full-rides. You're a shoe in for $76k though. That's still going to put you in the hole at over 30k a year, however.
And you won't be paying sticker at Texas either. You'll get $7k a year at UT.
Overrall. I say that you can go to UT and feel confident about it.
Anyways. You won't be getting a full-ride to SMU, I don't think that SMU really does full-rides. You're a shoe in for $76k though. That's still going to put you in the hole at over 30k a year, however.
And you won't be paying sticker at Texas either. You'll get $7k a year at UT.
Overrall. I say that you can go to UT and feel confident about it.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:39 am
- top30man
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:11 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
johansantana21 wrote:emkay625 wrote:I would choose Texas if it were me.
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
Could one get in-state tuition at TX after the first year?
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
People seem to think you cannot, but yes you can after one year if you go about it correctly.DoubleChecks wrote:Could one get in-state tuition at TX after the first year?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Richie Tenenbaum
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
Really? Legislature closed the "buy land" loophole. I'm really not sure if there is another loophole available. (And I say loophole, bc Texas doesn't treat oos students who come to Texas to study as being eligible for later instate rates.)AssumptionRequired wrote:People seem to think you cannot, but yes you can after one year if you go about it correctly.DoubleChecks wrote:Could one get in-state tuition at TX after the first year?
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
haha yea there are multiple things that need to be done. Unless something has changed in the last 6 months. If you are interested in knowing PM me. But I would rather not get into detail unless it was for someone oos at TexasRichie Tenenbaum wrote:Really? Legislature closed the "buy land" loophole. I'm really not sure if there is another loophole available. (And I say loophole, bc Texas doesn't treat oos students who come to Texas to study as being eligible for later instate rates.)AssumptionRequired wrote:People seem to think you cannot, but yes you can after one year if you go about it correctly.DoubleChecks wrote:Could one get in-state tuition at TX after the first year?
I went to UT as oos (UG) and got in state after 1 year. Also assisted a friend in gaining in state before his 2L (he obtained it, given in state over the summer after his 1L). It took some work and money but he got it
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
UT typically couples their scholarship with an in-state waiver, so 21K is really 66K+
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride
Current SMU student. Happy to provide more in-depth thoughts if desired, but go to Texas.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login