Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
Marlin88

New
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:03 pm

Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by Marlin88 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 11:55 pm

If I'm wanting to live in the Dallas area following law school (hopefully doing business/corporate law) what do you think would be the better choice? I haven't heard back from either school yet so the "~sticker vs. full ride" isn't absolute, just a guess based on last year's LSN applicants. My numbers: 168, 4.0, White Male, Non-TX Resident

My dilemma is that I really want to go to a top school, but I don't want to be saddled down with debt for 10+ years after law school. I have no debt from undergrad so I don't really know what it is like to have loads of debt after graduation, but I have heard horror stories about how awful it is paying off student loans. I've talked to some people who have taken out huge loans to go to top schools who say that it was worth it, and others who say that it wasn't worth the money. Can anyone speak to this, maybe from experience paying for undergrad or if there are some post-law school lurkers on here that have experience paying back loans from law school, in hindsight do you think it was a good or bad decision?

Right now I'm leaning towards UT if I'm accepted. Last year most people with 168, 3.8+'s got $21,000 from UT, but that would still mean I'd have to pay $130,000 to go there and because of the budget crisis they are having this year I might not even get any money at all.

Any advice is appreciated. Thanks.

User avatar
emkay625

Gold
Posts: 1988
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by emkay625 » Mon Nov 14, 2011 12:07 am

I would choose Texas if it were me.

User avatar
IAFG

Platinum
Posts: 6641
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by IAFG » Mon Nov 14, 2011 12:13 am

If you don't do well at SMU and miss a six figure job, cost of attendance loans alone may well take 10 years to pay off anyway.

Transferthrowaway

Silver
Posts: 605
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:40 am

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by Transferthrowaway » Mon Nov 14, 2011 12:19 am

I hate to ask this, but possibility of a retake?

User avatar
Marlin88

New
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:03 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by Marlin88 » Mon Nov 14, 2011 12:27 am

No possibility of a retake, I'm out of the country until after the December LSAT and I have too much going on before the February test and I definitely want to start law school next fall.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
holdencaulfield

Bronze
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:12 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by holdencaulfield » Mon Nov 14, 2011 12:55 am

I had almost this exact choice. Went to SMU and loved it.

User avatar
johansantana21

Silver
Posts: 855
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by johansantana21 » Mon Nov 14, 2011 1:01 am

emkay625 wrote:I would choose Texas if it were me.

User avatar
FryBreadPower

Silver
Posts: 908
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by FryBreadPower » Mon Nov 14, 2011 1:02 am

johansantana21 wrote:
emkay625 wrote:I would choose Texas if it were me.

User avatar
Gail

Silver
Posts: 977
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:11 am

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by Gail » Mon Nov 14, 2011 11:25 am

[waits for people to jump in and tell you to retake]

Anyways. You won't be getting a full-ride to SMU, I don't think that SMU really does full-rides. You're a shoe in for $76k though. That's still going to put you in the hole at over 30k a year, however.


And you won't be paying sticker at Texas either. You'll get $7k a year at UT.

Overrall. I say that you can go to UT and feel confident about it.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


decaf735

New
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:39 am

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by decaf735 » Mon Nov 14, 2011 11:32 am

Texas!!

User avatar
top30man

Silver
Posts: 1224
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:11 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by top30man » Mon Nov 14, 2011 11:42 am

johansantana21 wrote:
emkay625 wrote:I would choose Texas if it were me.

User avatar
DoubleChecks

Gold
Posts: 2328
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by DoubleChecks » Mon Nov 14, 2011 12:06 pm

Could one get in-state tuition at TX after the first year?

005618502

Gold
Posts: 2577
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by 005618502 » Mon Nov 14, 2011 12:20 pm

DoubleChecks wrote:Could one get in-state tuition at TX after the first year?
People seem to think you cannot, but yes you can after one year if you go about it correctly.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Richie Tenenbaum

Gold
Posts: 2118
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by Richie Tenenbaum » Mon Nov 14, 2011 12:56 pm

AssumptionRequired wrote:
DoubleChecks wrote:Could one get in-state tuition at TX after the first year?
People seem to think you cannot, but yes you can after one year if you go about it correctly.
Really? Legislature closed the "buy land" loophole. I'm really not sure if there is another loophole available. (And I say loophole, bc Texas doesn't treat oos students who come to Texas to study as being eligible for later instate rates.)

005618502

Gold
Posts: 2577
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by 005618502 » Mon Nov 14, 2011 1:34 pm

Richie Tenenbaum wrote:
AssumptionRequired wrote:
DoubleChecks wrote:Could one get in-state tuition at TX after the first year?
People seem to think you cannot, but yes you can after one year if you go about it correctly.
Really? Legislature closed the "buy land" loophole. I'm really not sure if there is another loophole available. (And I say loophole, bc Texas doesn't treat oos students who come to Texas to study as being eligible for later instate rates.)
haha yea there are multiple things that need to be done. Unless something has changed in the last 6 months. If you are interested in knowing PM me. But I would rather not get into detail unless it was for someone oos at Texas

I went to UT as oos (UG) and got in state after 1 year. Also assisted a friend in gaining in state before his 2L (he obtained it, given in state over the summer after his 1L). It took some work and money but he got it

de5igual

Silver
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by de5igual » Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:51 pm

UT typically couples their scholarship with an in-state waiver, so 21K is really 66K+

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: Texas @ ~Sticker vs. SMU Full Ride

Post by kalvano » Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:54 pm

Current SMU student. Happy to provide more in-depth thoughts if desired, but go to Texas.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”