SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
OperaSoprano

Gold
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:54 am

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by OperaSoprano » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:04 am

Helmholtz wrote:Mine was about ten points off.


I think I'll just /self now. I got a 740 on the writing section of the SAT II. 700 US History, 640 Math. I sometimes think of this as an indicator of what might have happened on a retake, since I was a lot more relaxed that day, though I didn't study very much more.

Maybe it just means I suck less at writing (unscored) than at the sections that actually mattered. FML.

User avatar
irie

Bronze
Posts: 323
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:50 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by irie » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:21 am

predicted 167, actual 175

i blame the kaplan SAT course i took in high school.

0L Hoping for 1

Silver
Posts: 1322
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by 0L Hoping for 1 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:24 am

Not even close for me. (I sucked on the SAT). I think it was because I actually cared about the LSAT?

User avatar
Tangerine Gleam

Silver
Posts: 1280
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by Tangerine Gleam » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:38 am

Wow. Pretty impressive.

1520 on my SAT predicts 173 on my LSAT. That's my exact goal, and I've been averaging low 170's on practice tests.

User avatar
lawlover829

Bronze
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 9:40 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by lawlover829 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:43 am

This was BS for me. I actually did study for the SAT

1140

LSAT 176

Big gap.. I think i got smarter :)

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
wackjickham

Bronze
Posts: 458
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by wackjickham » Fri Sep 04, 2009 11:08 am

Completely off for me. 1350 on the SAT (F-ing 780 on the writing section that no schools looked at because it was the first year they used it) Predicted a 165 for me. 174 actual. I prepped for the SAT but I prepped a lot harder for the LSAT.

User avatar
capitalacq

Silver
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:42 am

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by capitalacq » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:03 pm

it nailed it for me... but it won't hold up for my retake

wired

Bronze
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by wired » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:33 pm

OldBlue wrote:Someone posted this on that "other" forum.

I found it interesting and thought I'd relay it. It was EXACTLY on for me.

LSAT = (SAT*/21) + 101 (m.o.e +/-5)


*old 1600 based SAT



Converting from an ACT to an SAT....

1255/21 + 101 = 161

I scored a 169.

Fail.

Pearalegal

Silver
Posts: 1433
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:50 am

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by Pearalegal » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:34 pm

Predicted a 160, got a 168. Not sure what to think of that.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
KimmyGibbler

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:46 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by KimmyGibbler » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:36 pm

Said I should have gotten a 167 and I did. I am relieved because I thought I should have done better on the LSAT

User avatar
SamSeaborn2016

Bronze
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:07 pm

Re:

Post by SamSeaborn2016 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:39 pm

I scored almsot 7 points higher than I was supposed to on the LSAT. Well, either that or I really sucked it up on the SAT.

astro1819

Bronze
Posts: 302
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:18 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by astro1819 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:40 pm

Anyone do WORSE than this would predict? Majority seems to have scored same or better than predicted.

User avatar
Helmholtz

Gold
Posts: 4128
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by Helmholtz » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:41 pm

I took the ACT when I was 16 and didn't even study for it. ftl
Never took the SAT.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Lmao Zedong

Bronze
Posts: 381
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by Lmao Zedong » Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:38 pm

1600 on math + reasoning (780 on the new verbal, but i assume that shouldn't be part of the equation for this).

still outperformed my LSAT prediction

User avatar
JCougar

Gold
Posts: 3208
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by JCougar » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:11 pm

It predicted a 162, and I got a 161 on my initial LSAT diagnostic.

I took the SAT cold and didn't study for it at all, so I guess that makes this formula pretty accurate.

Hopefully, studying this time will get me better than a 162. I haven't scored that low on any PT since, and I've scored as high as 178. I think anything 168 and above will make me very happy, but I want to get a 170 to give me a shot at Cornell.

User avatar
Lyov Myshkin

Bronze
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by Lyov Myshkin » Fri Sep 04, 2009 11:57 pm

Kohinoor wrote:
awesomerossum wrote:"RE: awesome's drop-the-zero-add-a-one conversion. The LSAT's overlap with the Verbal section is pretty clear. But I think the Math section could be an important indicator, as the logic games rely on similar skills.
"

I dunno. The SAT I math is ridiculously easy. In fact, an 800 is around the 86th percentile!

That couldn't possibly be right.

::edit::Yeah, that's wrong. If you think about it, it makes no sense for them to design a test that is unable to distinguish among the top 14% of student. If an 800 was at the 86th percentile, they'd redesign the test.

http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downlo ... Groups.pdf


i have a feeling that awesomerossum is actually talking about the sat ii subject test in math. prolly iic, where the 800 is like 90% or lower.

User avatar
bostonian

Bronze
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:08 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by bostonian » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:33 am

Predicted 175, got 176. I think this formula gets a little less accurate above 1500 though, since 1600 translates to 177, meaning no one would be predicted to get a 180.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Lmao Zedong

Bronze
Posts: 381
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by Lmao Zedong » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:01 am

bostonian wrote:Predicted 175, got 176. I think this formula gets a little less accurate above 1500 though, since 1600 translates to 177, meaning no one would be predicted to get a 180.


i don't think this is completely unreasonable though. a 180 is definitely tougher to get than a 1600. the LSAT has a higher ceiling than the SAT so i think it kinda makes sense that the formula's "input" ceiling can't give you the highest possible LSAT score

astro1819

Bronze
Posts: 302
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:18 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by astro1819 » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:25 am

Predicted 169, actual 168. Slightly lower than PT average, so a bit disappointing, but it is amazing how close the SAT-->LSAT prediction was.

User avatar
Tangerine Gleam

Silver
Posts: 1280
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by Tangerine Gleam » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:36 am

Predicts a 173.

Got a 172.

Dammit!

User avatar
missvik218

Silver
Posts: 1103
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:45 am

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by missvik218 » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:40 am

I used to think that I was bad a standardized tests and there was nothing I could do about it ... prediction 159 (based on mediocre SAT) actual 169, I'm glad the predictor and myself were wrong!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


inmans

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:12 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by inmans » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:43 am

..
Last edited by inmans on Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

jrgong

New
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:10 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by jrgong » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:50 am

Predicted: 168
Actual: 173

i didn't study for the SAT, i studied intensely for the LSAT.

showNprove

Silver
Posts: 968
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:52 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by showNprove » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:59 am

This formula was dead on my practice average. Test day fail.


Edit: WTF. I took the SAT twice. When I plug in my first SAT score, I get my LSAT score (off by less than 3/4 a point). This formula is buggin' me out.

I should have taken the LSAT again. Goddamn it.

User avatar
nahgems

Bronze
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by nahgems » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:03 pm

predicted 173. actual 163. sigh.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”