SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
00TREX00

Bronze
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 7:41 pm

Post by 00TREX00 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:42 am

...
Last edited by 00TREX00 on Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

18488

Bronze
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:57 am

Post by 18488 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:56 am

gave me 163, got 166. pretty close

phillyphanatic

New
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:26 am

Post by phillyphanatic » Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:31 am

Overestimated my LSAT score by .85. That's pretty sweet. And pithy, the formula says a 1350 should get you a 165.

riccardo426

New
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:05 pm

Post by riccardo426 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:02 am

Says my 1470 (750v, 720m) translates to a 171. I sure hope so!

But that margin of error (+/- 5) is huge.

User avatar
rhit2004

New
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:04 pm

Post by rhit2004 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:29 am

Could not have been closer
SAT: 1380 -> Predicted LSAT 166.7 -> Actual LSAT 167

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Pyke

Bronze
Posts: 147
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:28 pm

Post by Pyke » Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:35 am

I scored a 1260 on my SAT (no prep, took it for fun).

That translates to a 161 on the formulaic version, +/- 5.

(1260/21) + 101.

I scored a 166, with virtually no prep, on the LSAT. I suppose in that sense it's accurate. The retake (with prep but with misbubbling) I scored 163.

Now it's worth noting here, that this formula would likely be MORE accurate if it was based on mental ability.

The problem is, both tests are crackable with sufficient studying meaning that you throw off the curve. :)

Potential1L

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:24 am

Post by Potential1L » Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:36 am

says i shoulda gotten a 172.4 or so


to use edgarderby's phrasing:

I GOT LUCKY SON

User avatar
lizzy1280

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:41 am

Post by lizzy1280 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:10 pm

wow, says i should have gotten a 173, got a 176. since i didn't care very much about the SATs, pretty close.

User avatar
clio2007

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:38 pm

Post by clio2007 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:17 pm

...
Last edited by clio2007 on Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Go Bears

New
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:06 pm

Post by Go Bears » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:22 pm

High school slacker here.

Predicted: 161

Actual: 169

God I get pissed at myself sometimes for my youthful stubborness.

Fly

New
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:52 pm

Post by Fly » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:31 pm

This was dead on for my average practice LSAT score (171). Too bad I didn't manage that on actual test day...

User avatar
tmo

Bronze
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:55 pm

Post by tmo » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:35 pm

Wow, mine was dead on.

User avatar
nipplehead

Bronze
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:58 pm

Post by nipplehead » Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:07 pm

says i should have gotten a 175, got a 177

not bad, pretty close

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


wesleybs

New
Posts: 97
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:53 pm

Post by wesleybs » Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:48 pm

According to this formula I should have scored 12 points lower on the LSAT.

User avatar
Chanelgirl

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:06 am

Post by Chanelgirl » Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:59 pm

I don't suppose that the formula would still make sense for people who took their SAT barely knowing English at the time? It's been 5 years or so, and now I am fluent. I don't suppose it would work for people like myself?

User avatar
OldBlue

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:56 am

Post by OldBlue » Wed Nov 21, 2007 5:51 pm

^^^ I think that's a fair assumption.

To anyone who hasn't taken the test yet: I would not put ANY stock in this formula; just study your asses off like you know you should.

On the other hand, its pinpoint accuracy for a huge number of people is... well, kinda creepy.

RE: awesome's drop-the-zero-add-a-one conversion. The LSAT's overlap with the Verbal section is pretty clear. But I think the Math section could be an important indicator, as the logic games rely on similar skills.

User avatar
idrinkcoffee

New
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:12 pm

Post by idrinkcoffee » Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:13 pm

Wow. Mine was almost spot-on for my first LSAT, but ten points off for my second one.

I wouldn't use this as a "predictor," but it is kind of fun. :)

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
gravity

New
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:35 pm

Post by gravity » Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:38 pm

cool... off by 1 point for me

User avatar
awesomerossum

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:39 pm

Post by awesomerossum » Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:58 pm

"RE: awesome's drop-the-zero-add-a-one conversion. The LSAT's overlap with the Verbal section is pretty clear. But I think the Math section could be an important indicator, as the logic games rely on similar skills.
"

I dunno. The SAT I math is ridiculously easy. In fact, an 800 is around the 86th percentile!

User avatar
Kohinoor

Gold
Posts: 2641
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm

Re:

Post by Kohinoor » Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:15 am

awesomerossum wrote:"RE: awesome's drop-the-zero-add-a-one conversion. The LSAT's overlap with the Verbal section is pretty clear. But I think the Math section could be an important indicator, as the logic games rely on similar skills.
"

I dunno. The SAT I math is ridiculously easy. In fact, an 800 is around the 86th percentile!

That couldn't possibly be right.

::edit::Yeah, that's wrong. If you think about it, it makes no sense for them to design a test that is unable to distinguish among the top 14% of student. If an 800 was at the 86th percentile, they'd redesign the test.

http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downlo ... Groups.pdf

User avatar
rayiner

Platinum
Posts: 6145
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: Re:

Post by rayiner » Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:25 am

Kohinoor wrote:
awesomerossum wrote:"RE: awesome's drop-the-zero-add-a-one conversion. The LSAT's overlap with the Verbal section is pretty clear. But I think the Math section could be an important indicator, as the logic games rely on similar skills.
"

I dunno. The SAT I math is ridiculously easy. In fact, an 800 is around the 86th percentile!

That couldn't possibly be right.

::edit::Yeah, that's wrong. If you think about it, it makes no sense for them to design a test that is unable to distinguish among the top 14% of student. If an 800 was at the 86th percentile, they'd redesign the test.

http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downlo ... Groups.pdf


Dude, it's been almost 2 years.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
OperaSoprano

Gold
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:54 am

Re:

Post by OperaSoprano » Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:33 am

awesomerossum wrote:Sorry, I use a different formula for calculating SAT-LSAT correlation. My old tutor said that one's starting point should be the verbal score with the last zero removed and a one added to the front.

I scored an 800 on the verbal. Technically, I should've started from a 180.


Goddamnit. Goddamnit! Why did I have to fuck up the LSAT so badly?

My score was predicted exactly by the OP's formula, but if this works too, I could have done a lot better.

Disclaimer: My SAT prep probably sucked even more than my LSAT prep. Actually, it was kind of nonexistent.

User avatar
23fulltimecowboys

New
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by 23fulltimecowboys » Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:37 am

dead on.

User avatar
Dtackpat75

Bronze
Posts: 217
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:28 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by Dtackpat75 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:38 am

Predicted: 162

Actual: 174

I didn't try very hard in HS :shock:

User avatar
Helmholtz

Gold
Posts: 4128
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by Helmholtz » Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:50 am

Mine was about ten points off.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”