SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
OldBlue

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:56 am

SAT/LSAT Conversion Forumla

Post by OldBlue » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:39 am

Someone posted this on that "other" forum.

I found it interesting and thought I'd relay it. It was EXACTLY on for me.

LSAT = (SAT*/21) + 101 (m.o.e +/-5)


*old 1600 based SAT

User avatar
snap

New
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:12 pm

Post by snap » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:41 am

Based on this formula I should've gotten a 167 or so. I was such a slacker in high school...

User avatar
edgarderby

Bronze
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:51 pm

Post by edgarderby » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:42 am

wow.

hit it dead on for me.

Soulofheaven8

New
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:29 pm

Post by Soulofheaven8 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:44 am

According to this formula I should've gotten a 176; that would have been nice.

User avatar
wolverine37

New
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:27 pm

Post by wolverine37 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:46 am

I wish I got that on my LSAT.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


iwanttogotolawschool

New
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:23 pm

Post by iwanttogotolawschool » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:55 am

Dead on for me.

User avatar
Corsair

Gold
Posts: 2168
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 1981 12:25 am

Post by Corsair » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:55 am

..

User avatar
the rza

Bronze
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 10:33 am

Post by the rza » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:56 am

gave me a 160, got a 167

Da Stain

Bronze
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:50 am

Post by Da Stain » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:56 am

spot on. f'in creepy

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
chris0805

Silver
Posts: 661
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:12 pm

Post by chris0805 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:59 am

Pretty dead on for me... though I did drop seven points from my last three practice tests to the real thing... not sure that means anything at all though.

jlbarde

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 12:00 am

Post by jlbarde » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:01 am

gave me a 171, I got a 168. woulda been nice, but I also took the SAT 5 times... and my first couple scores were much much worse

User avatar
Dadric

New
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:25 am

Post by Dadric » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:07 am

Took the ACT, not the SAT.

Wish there was a formula for that =/

User avatar
cc0800

New
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:31 pm

Post by cc0800 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:11 am

gave me 167, i got a 170

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
edgarderby

Bronze
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:51 pm

Post by edgarderby » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:11 am

1570-1600 35
1510-1560 34
1450-1500 33
1390-1440 32
1350-1380 31
1310-1340 30
1270-1300 29
1230-1260 28
1200-1220 27
1160-1190 26
1120-1150 25
1090-1110 24
1050-1080 23
1010-1040 22
970-1000 21
930-960 20
890-920 19
840-880 18
800-830 17
750-790 16
700-740 15
630-690 14
570-620 13
510-560 12
450-500 11
410-440 10
400 9

User avatar
Origin

New
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:56 pm

Post by Origin » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:14 am

Said I should have got a 168. I win.

User avatar
TheRedDeath

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:00 am

Post by TheRedDeath » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:16 am

Gave me a 167, actually got a 169. Not bad.

troutbeck

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:39 pm

Post by troutbeck » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:16 am

got it exactly
very cool

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
edgarderby

Bronze
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:51 pm

Post by edgarderby » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:17 am

Kayos, that means:

YOU GOT LUCKY, SON!

But congrats anyway. Enjoy Yale when the time comes. haha

rms5005

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:02 pm

Post by rms5005 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:24 am

wow thats pretty sick...said i shudda got a 165--got a 172 but only after getting a 160 the first time so 166 avg...pretty dead on

User avatar
awesomerossum

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:39 pm

Post by awesomerossum » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:25 am

I should've gotten a 180.

purplepansy

New
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 10:45 pm

Post by purplepansy » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:42 am

Took the ACT, not the SAT.
Works for ACT too pretty much.
I just used a converter I found through google, found the range of SAT scores I would've had and it gave me mine perfectly if I chose the correct range.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Dadric

New
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:25 am

Post by Dadric » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:47 am

Using the range for my ACT score Edgar posted, it says I should have gotten a 166...lower than my cold diagnostic. Looks like I'm WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER on this one.

Hitachi

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:38 pm

Post by Hitachi » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:07 am

Nice, 1660 on the SAT for Rossum

prettypithy

New
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 2:08 am

Post by prettypithy » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:32 am

Am I the only one who doesn't get it? I'm perplexed. I got a 1350--someone tell me what my LSAT score should be!

User avatar
awesomerossum

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:39 pm

Post by awesomerossum » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:42 am

Sorry, I use a different formula for calculating SAT-LSAT correlation. My old tutor said that one's starting point should be the verbal score with the last zero removed and a one added to the front.

I scored an 800 on the verbal. Technically, I should've started from a 180.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”