LSAT Addendum--- HUGE Split Forum
- ColtsFan88
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:05 pm
LSAT Addendum--- HUGE Split
I've taken the LSAT 3 times. 152-166-177. I really have no reason for this other than better, more focused studying. I guess my first lsat would've been closer to 160 if I hadn't frozen up on games the first time (first section- all downhill from there). Do I write an addendum? I fell like I don't really have anything to say, and more studying is obvious at this point.
-
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:01 pm
Re: LSAT Addendum--- HUGE Split
Care to share any of your more focused study tips?ColtsFan88 wrote:I've taken the LSAT 3 times. 152-166-177. I really have no reason for this other than better, more focused studying. I guess my first lsat would've been closer to 160 if I hadn't frozen up on games the first time (first section- all downhill from there). Do I write an addendum? I fell like I don't really have anything to say, and more studying is obvious at this point.
Last edited by 6lehderjets on Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: LSAT Addendum--- HUGE Split
Avoid it where you can. Some schools really want an addendum for big score differences though.
- ColtsFan88
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:05 pm
Re: LSAT Addendum--- HUGE Split
Not really. A dedicated course of the PitheyPike Method seems like money to me though.6lehderjets wrote:Care to share any of your more focused study tips?ColtsFan88 wrote:I've taken the LSAT 3 times. 152-166-177. I really have no reason for this other than better, more focused studying. I guess my first lsat would've been closer to 160 if I hadn't frozen up on games the first time (first section- all downhill from there). Do I write an addendum? I fell like I don't really have anything to say, and more studying is obvious at this point.
EDIT: thanks bdubs (the restaurant?- my fave). I haven't come across any specifically asking for one so avoid it if I can is good advice.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: LSAT Addendum--- HUGE Split
IIRC Chicago was one of the only ones that said they wanted an addendum with jumps of 6 points or more. Can't remember about the other T14.ColtsFan88 wrote:Not really. A dedicated course of the PitheyPike Method seems like money to me though.6lehderjets wrote:Care to share any of your more focused study tips?ColtsFan88 wrote:I've taken the LSAT 3 times. 152-166-177. I really have no reason for this other than better, more focused studying. I guess my first lsat would've been closer to 160 if I hadn't frozen up on games the first time (first section- all downhill from there). Do I write an addendum? I fell like I don't really have anything to say, and more studying is obvious at this point.
EDIT: thanks bdubs (the restaurant?- my fave). I haven't come across any specifically asking for one so avoid it if I can is good advice.
I wrote an addendum and submitted it to all of my schools, but I had a more legit reason to write one.
- theadvancededit
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:31 pm
Re: LSAT Addendum--- HUGE Split
You shouldn't have to rewrite one-- your upward trend should say enough. However, do check with your schools because some ask for increases of 5 or more points. Congrats though, that is a serious jump!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login