Thanks and a few questions... Forum
-
dhbzz

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:35 pm
Thanks and a few questions...
.
Last edited by dhbzz on Mon Apr 04, 2011 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
whymeohgodno

- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Thanks and a few questions...
1. Don't know.
2. Tutor/Courses don't matter. It's all about having the self motivation. You can't buy your way into a good LSAT score.
3. You would need new letters.
2. Tutor/Courses don't matter. It's all about having the self motivation. You can't buy your way into a good LSAT score.
3. You would need new letters.
- NCtoDC

- Posts: 542
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:48 pm
Re: Thanks and a few questions...
Actually, according to the LSAC website "Letters and evaluations sent to LSAC remain the property of LSAC and will remain active for the life of your file. Letters and evaluations will be neither returned to nor copied for the candidate."
Therefore, the LORs are good for the 5 years that your CAS account is active. You may, however, over the course of a few years find that those are irrelevant to your current life situation. I think a law school would want something more current.
As for studying...I think self study is just as good as those classes. I spent about 200 dollars in books and went from a 154 to a 165 in about 6 months--and I was not very regimented in my study plan.
Therefore, the LORs are good for the 5 years that your CAS account is active. You may, however, over the course of a few years find that those are irrelevant to your current life situation. I think a law school would want something more current.
As for studying...I think self study is just as good as those classes. I spent about 200 dollars in books and went from a 154 to a 165 in about 6 months--and I was not very regimented in my study plan.
- Magnolia

- Posts: 547
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:06 pm
Re: Thanks and a few questions...
1. Employment is employment. The position being full-time, paid, etc. is less important than you getting experience in something and being in a professional work environment. As long as your spending your time doing something besides sitting on the couch watching soaps, you're fine.
2. I self-studied, so I really don't know.
3. LSAC will keep LORs on file for 5 years. After that you would need new letters.
2. I self-studied, so I really don't know.
3. LSAC will keep LORs on file for 5 years. After that you would need new letters.
-
dhbzz

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:35 pm
Re: Thanks and a few questions...
.
Last edited by dhbzz on Mon Apr 04, 2011 1:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- almightypush

- Posts: 230
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:19 am
Re: Thanks and a few questions...
Completely incorrect. I applied to law schools this cycle using LORs collected from my professors during senior year of UG (2005).whymeohgodno wrote:
3. You would need new letters.
edit - i see others have touched on this already... oh, well.
-
whymeohgodno

- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Thanks and a few questions...
I've heard that you should have at least 1 new LOR from an employer or wherever you have been employed/studying if you graduated longer than 2 years ago.almightypush wrote:Completely incorrect. I applied to law schools this cycle using LORs collected from my professors during senior year of UG (2005).whymeohgodno wrote:
3. You would need new letters.
edit - i see others have touched on this already... oh, well.
-
youarereadingthis

- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:57 pm
Re: Thanks and a few questions...
You heard wrong.whymeohgodno wrote:I've heard that you should have at least 1 new LOR from an employer or wherever you have been employed/studying if you graduated longer than 2 years ago.almightypush wrote:Completely incorrect. I applied to law schools this cycle using LORs collected from my professors during senior year of UG (2005).whymeohgodno wrote:
3. You would need new letters.
edit - i see others have touched on this already... oh, well.