Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite Forum
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:11 pm
Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
LSAT 165 GPA 3.8 is not a reverse splitter, its a solid grade
LSAT 170 plus GPA 3,9 from IVY is Genius or Near Genius. Lets not pretend that retaking the test will ever place you into that category. Maybe of course URMS
Then theres the true reverse splitters those stories will help elucidate the importance of a good GPA and strong softs.
So reverse splitters not pseudoreverse lets hear your stories, Admit, WL,Hold, Reject. Thanks.
LSAT 170 plus GPA 3,9 from IVY is Genius or Near Genius. Lets not pretend that retaking the test will ever place you into that category. Maybe of course URMS
Then theres the true reverse splitters those stories will help elucidate the importance of a good GPA and strong softs.
So reverse splitters not pseudoreverse lets hear your stories, Admit, WL,Hold, Reject. Thanks.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
First, http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =7&t=91966
Second,
Second,
I read this sentence 5 times and still don't really see what you're trying to say.LSAT 170 plus GPA 3,9 from IVY is Genius or Near Genius. Lets not pretend that retaking the test will ever place you into that category. Maybe of course URMS
- 1evilo.aihpos
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:37 am
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
yeah, i only understood half your post, but i can tell this is not going far.
-
- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
i LOL'd. tagged for excessive sillinessenergizer wrote:LSAT 165 GPA 3.8 is not a reverse splitter, its a solid grade
LSAT 170 plus GPA 3,9 from IVY is Genius or Near Genius. Lets not pretend that retaking the test will ever place you into that category. Maybe of course URMS
Then theres the true reverse splitters those stories will help elucidate the importance of a good GPA and strong softs.
So reverse splitters not pseudoreverse lets hear your stories, Admit, WL,Hold, Reject. Thanks.
edit: people who spend all their time studying are often NOT geniuses - i'd just like to point that out
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:11 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
your right about that but mensa seems to think that excessively hi lsats qualify these people as genius material. go figure.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nulli Secundus
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
Usually I do not decide a person is an idiot until I look into their eyes and make sure they are utterly devoid of the glimmer of intelligence (hard to describe, idiot people stare like dead fish). But this is the closest I ve come to a hundred percent certainty about my judgement regarding anyones intelligence without meeting that criterion.energizer wrote:your right about that but mensa seems to think that excessively hi lsats qualify these people as genius material. go figure.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:11 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
Its gotten to the point that no matter how serious you try to be and elicit important info from forum users the responses are becoming exceedingly more useless. Makes you wonder how much credence you can give to any of these posts.
- Deuce
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:12 am
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
I hope you're not a flame because this is just funnyenergizer wrote:Its gotten to the point that no matter how serious you try to be and elicit important info from forum users the responses are becoming exceedingly more useless. Makes you wonder how much credence you can give to any of these posts.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:11 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
Outright shameful responses. Growup!
-
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
Glad to see this thread. I definitely belong here.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:11 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
Thanks. Finally a decent response. This thread can be very helpful to us if taken seriously. Please provide your stats and progress so far. Thanks
-
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
154, 3.83
Just submitted applications last week because I had to wait for my December LSAT score (which didn't help much anyway). I applied to 13 schools so I will update when I start to hear back.
Just submitted applications last week because I had to wait for my December LSAT score (which didn't help much anyway). I applied to 13 schools so I will update when I start to hear back.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:11 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
good luck well keep each other posted
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
Thanks, good luck to you too!
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:01 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
I fall into this definition of reverse splitter with a 157/3.63. denied at W&L. I recieved a fee waiver from them, so I was expecting to be waitlisted at least, accepted to UM, SLU, and Fl. Coastal so far. I applied to many more schools so I will keep you posted as well.
Last edited by shmegory on Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
I can't understand your post.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:01 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
my post?FiveSermon wrote:I can't understand your post.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:11 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
Your post makes perfect sense. Congrats on your acceptances. When did you hear from UM. My concern with them is the price tag. Ive been advised to consider FIU with or without Scholarship if I want to stay in Miami. Despite its T4 status, and tough curve(seems to be common at most I think) ive heard nothing but good things about it. What do you think?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:01 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
Thank you. I heard from UM December 30th or someday around there. I am concerned with the price tag as well. I've heard many good things about FIU as well, and it is another school I applied to. I know FIU is on the rise, but I have also heard that UM is just as good of a choice, if not better than UF, to attend if you plan on working in the Dade/Broward area -- AKA south florida. However, it is unlikely that "reverse splitters" will recieve scholarships from UM. Based on LSN, you need low to mid 160s for any kind of money. The good news, and an incentive to work hard in the first year, you can recieve scholarships based on first year performance - for your remaing semesters.
Last edited by shmegory on Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
I also applied to UM (and am considering applying to FIU also). UM is definitely the best option if you want to practice in South Florida. I keep hearing FIU is on the rise but who knows how long it will be before it establishes the type of reputation that Miami has. Obviously, UF or FSU would be my top choices, but with my numbers I have a very little chance of getting in. As of right now, I would be happy attending either UM or Stetson, but I'm also concerned about the price.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:11 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
Yea. $160,000.00 is a tough nut to crack. Im abit scared of incurring that kind of debt.do you think its still worth attending. this is a very important question that we all will inevitably face with similar stats. Stetson also has a hefty price tag
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
I have the same dilemma (though I haven't even been accepted to Miami yet). I would absolutely love to attend Miami. I went to their open house in October and absolutely loved everything about the school. But like you said, $160,000 is pretty scary. I can most likely get into a school like Nova with money and even FIU full price isn't too bad, so it will be a difficult decision to make.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:11 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
I havent gotten into miami yet either. I think that the decision to attend( providing we do get in) has to be made very carefully. Perhaps with the help of current students, alumni, and an accountant as well. Im not kidding, thats one hec of a debt. I also would love to get in and attend. The more info we can muster up on this subject the better.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:11 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
sorry posted same info twice
Last edited by energizer on Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:01 pm
Re: Reverse Splitters(LSAT <160, GPA 3.5 or above) unite
I think it is absolutely worth attending. I say this because I am confident that I will have the ability to pay off any debt that I incur. I am also confident that somone browsing this forum will tell me different, but let the haters hate.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login