Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site? Forum
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:27 pm
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
Dude the article is 13 years old from their student paper archive site.
- 5ky
- Posts: 10835
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
That is from 1997.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
Ummmm....
EDIT: Ah fuck two people beat me to it.
?May/June 1997
EDIT: Ah fuck two people beat me to it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
I doubt that will affect Stanford's prestige much. I think Stanford's branding carries more weight than any USNWR article.whymeohgodno wrote:They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
Now now this is not a race ...bk187 wrote:Ummmm....
?May/June 1997
EDIT: Ah fuck two people beat me to it.

-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
Do you know if Stanford feels differently now?r6_philly wrote:Dude the article is 13 years old from their student paper archive site.
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
But it would be hilariousHopefulFish wrote:I doubt that will affect Stanford's prestige much. I think Stanford's branding carries more weight than any USNWR article.whymeohgodno wrote:They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.

-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
I know that the President in the article is no longer the President, and the student activists are no longer the student activists ... so yes, I think they feel differently than what was mentioned in the article.HopefulFish wrote:Do you know if Stanford feels differently now?r6_philly wrote:Dude the article is 13 years old from their student paper archive site.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
You're only saying that because you won.r6_philly wrote:Now now this is not a race ...

- chup
- Posts: 22942
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
Someone should tell OP that Plessy v. Ferguson has been overruled. It will blow his mind.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 2:02 am
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
Will they let me in then?whymeohgodno wrote:They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Sentry
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:38 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
That's what they said about Michigan in the 80s.HopefulFish wrote:I doubt that will affect Stanford's prestige much. I think Stanford's branding carries more weight than any USNWR article.whymeohgodno wrote:They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.
- s0ph1e2007
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
Dean Deal was pretty open about hating USnews lol
I mean this article totally doesn't apply, but stanford is definitely the most outspoken about it
I mean this article totally doesn't apply, but stanford is definitely the most outspoken about it
- Lawlcat
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:33 am
Re: Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
(Single Wolverine tear.)Sentry wrote:That's what they said about Michigan in the 80s.HopefulFish wrote:I doubt that will affect Stanford's prestige much. I think Stanford's branding carries more weight than any USNWR article.whymeohgodno wrote:They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login