Number of LORs Forum
- catsparka
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm
- lzyovrachievr
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:24 am
Re: Number of LORs
It probably won't hurt, as there aren't so many as to annoy people, but they might not read the 3rd one. Also, if the LORs say the same things, the schools might question your judgment. But if they're good, no real issue, besides being unnecessary.
Most people say to save the third for getting off waitlists.
Most people say to save the third for getting off waitlists.
- Ragged
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: Number of LORs
Stop it, cat. Just stop it, ok?
- catsparka
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm
Re: Number of LORs
Okay, thanks!lzyovrachievr wrote:It probably won't hurt, as there aren't so many as to annoy people, but they might not read the 3rd one. Also, if the LORs say the same things, the schools might question your judgment. But if they're good, no real issue, besides being unnecessary.
Most people say to save the third for getting off waitlists.

- catsparka
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm
Re: Number of LORs
? Sorry if I'm asking a lot of trivial questions on this forum. This whole application process is making me kind of neurotic.Ragged wrote:Stop it, cat. Just stop it, ok?

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Ragged
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: Number of LORs
Nah, I was just kidding. I'm sure with your stats worrying about the number "solid" LORs is unnecessery. You will do great.catsparka wrote:? Sorry if I'm asking a lot of trivial questions on this forum. This whole application process is making me kind of neurotic.Ragged wrote:Stop it, cat. Just stop it, ok?
Also, I sent in 3 even if 2 were required. Figure it can't hurt.
- catsparka
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm
Re: Number of LORs
Thanks!Ragged wrote:Nah, I was just kidding. I'm sure with your stats worrying about the number "solid" LORs is unnecessery. You will do great.catsparka wrote:? Sorry if I'm asking a lot of trivial questions on this forum. This whole application process is making me kind of neurotic.Ragged wrote:Stop it, cat. Just stop it, ok?
Also, I sent in 3 even if 2 were required. Figure it can't hurt.

-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Number of LORs
Send 2. They recommend it for a reason.
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: Number of LORs
If you check the box saying that you give up your right to read your letters then they can't really question your judgment because they know you don't even know what's in them.lzyovrachievr wrote:It probably won't hurt, as there aren't so many as to annoy people, but they might not read the 3rd one. Also, if the LORs say the same things, the schools might question your judgment. But if they're good, no real issue, besides being unnecessary.
Most people say to save the third for getting off waitlists.
<3 you Lzy
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: Number of LORs
The waiver form only says that you give up the right to see your LORs after enrolling at that law school, because they become part of your educational file. You're always free to ask the LOR writer to see a copy.LSpleaseee wrote:If you check the box saying that you give up your right to read your letters then they can't really question your judgment because they know you don't even know what's in them.lzyovrachievr wrote:It probably won't hurt, as there aren't so many as to annoy people, but they might not read the 3rd one. Also, if the LORs say the same things, the schools might question your judgment. But if they're good, no real issue, besides being unnecessary.
Most people say to save the third for getting off waitlists.
<3 you Lzy
- lzyovrachievr
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:24 am
Re: Number of LORs
Lol. You too pleasy. What I mean is that if you send 3 letters from politics professors that you've had in politics classes, they are likely to say the same things about you. Thus sending extra is redundant.LSpleaseee wrote:If you check the box saying that you give up your right to read your letters then they can't really question your judgment because they know you don't even know what's in them.lzyovrachievr wrote:It probably won't hurt, as there aren't so many as to annoy people, but they might not read the 3rd one. Also, if the LORs say the same things, the schools might question your judgment. But if they're good, no real issue, besides being unnecessary.
Most people say to save the third for getting off waitlists.
<3 you Lzy
And it might seem odd, but in fact many deans have commented on this and said you can send more LORs than their guideline, but it's a "question of judgment." (Specific quote from Columbia session.) If you're sending in 4 LORs that say the same thing, schools are going to wonder why you didn't just send 2. As I said, 3 isn't so bad. You can figure out generally what a LOR is going to say without reading it based on who you had write it and your contact with them. And just because schools should take it easy on you because you didn't read it doesn't mean they actually will. They need ways to distinguish between people, and if you don't show good sense in what you send them, that's a way to distinguish.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login