______ Forum
-
HopefullyLaw

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:24 pm
- StrictlyLiable

- Posts: 214
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:34 pm
Re: Please Offer Constructive Criticism - Addendum
Did you steal the documents? How did they charge you with theft? Overall, it seems good though.
-
HopefullyLaw

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:24 pm
Re: Please Offer Constructive Criticism - Addendum
I did not steal the documents personally. I received them via the postal service, which I admitted to the police before the arrest.
-
ARTfulDodger

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 12:57 am
Re: Please Offer Constructive Criticism - Addendum
I like it. It's short and sweet. Nice job!
- StrictlyLiable

- Posts: 214
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:34 pm
Re: Please Offer Constructive Criticism - Addendum
Wow that's crazy they could charge you with theft for that. You weren't convicted right? In that case, it might not be necessary for the addendum if it isn't going to show up on your record.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jtemp320

- Posts: 481
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:27 pm
Re: Please Offer Constructive Criticism - Addendum
Include this- it removes the question of what actions led directly to your arrest which the addendum raises in the readers mind.HopefullyLaw wrote:I did not steal the documents personally. I received them via the postal service, which I admitted to the police before the arrest.
I have to say, this addendum may be the rare one that adds something positive to your application - you took a personal risk to expose corruption and successfully did so - if you made any mistakes out of youthful enthusiasm you are willing to admit that but overall the incident reflects positively on you - at least from what you've written.
Good job
- StrictlyLiable

- Posts: 214
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:34 pm
Re: Please Offer Constructive Criticism - Addendum
jtemp320 wrote:Include this- it removes the question of what actions led directly to your arrest which the addendum raises in the readers mind.HopefullyLaw wrote:I did not steal the documents personally. I received them via the postal service, which I admitted to the police before the arrest.
I have to say, this addendum may be the rare one that adds something positive to your application - you took a personal risk to expose corruption and successfully did so - if you made any mistakes out of youthful enthusiasm you are willing to admit that but overall the incident reflects positively on you - at least from what you've written.
Good job
Agreed. I was left wondering what YOU personally did wrong. You might want to include this to show that the PD's charges were not appropriate and the whole reason it was ill-founded.
- SullaFelix

- Posts: 113
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:18 pm
Re: Please Offer Constructive Criticism - Addendum
Good stuff. A couple suggestions:HopefullyLaw wrote:Please offer any constructive criticism you have on the below addendum. I have yet to apply to law schools, but will be doing so soon. Thank you for your help.
Addendum
During the summer of 2006, I wrote a news story about corruption in the local police department. With a single-page document provided to me by a confidential source, I completely redacted all confidential information before publishing the material. The police department pressured me to disclose the name of my source, but I felt compelled to withhold the namebecause the promise I made to keep the individual’s name secret was my burden to bear. I exercised poor judgment when publishing the document even though it was a redacted copy.The police department waited until after I turned eighteen years old and then arrested me with the charge of theft in the fifth degree. Two days after I was arrested and released, the police chief was fired in a public city council meeting. The next month brought the resignation of another police officer that was involved with the corruption. The charge was eventually dropped and the name of my source was kept secret. The county attorney made the application for dismissal of the charge and the county magistrate dismissed the charge.
I would strike that bit in the middle I put a line through. You have a great story, that's best transmitted and will likely have the greatest impact written as succinctly, straightforward and unemotionally as possible. Let the "poor judgment" call be the view of someone else; chances are many readers won't have that take, so why put it in their head?
I would also include the name of the newspaper somewhere. I feel it would provide the writeup with a bit more factual certainty.
-
HopefullyLaw

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:24 pm
-
Bumi

- Posts: 947
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm
Re: Please Offer Constructive Criticism - Addendum
I like the new one better.
I think you did the right thing, and in fact I wish I could put this addendum on my application.
I think you did the right thing, and in fact I wish I could put this addendum on my application.
-
HopefullyLaw

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:24 pm
Re: Please Offer Constructive Criticism - Addendum
I appreciate the help. If schools don't ask about any legal troubles other than convictions, should I include this addendum or not? Thank you!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login