Honestly, that would be better than applying with your current score, because if you did 10 hours a week you would already have studied more than the first 2 times.darby girl wrote: I work 9 hours a day and take a full time course load of classes. I don't possibly see how I could devote more than a few hours each weekend... I would say at most 10 hours throughout the week...
Chances for people w/ lower numbers! Forum
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
- Barbie
- Posts: 3746
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
very true. also, what should i study? LG was my BEST section prior (got 0-1 wrong on each PT) but on the actual test it is what killed me. I only got 1 right on the last game. I got almost none wrong on LR, and RC was better than usual, but it is usually my worst (ironic, huh, for an english major...) does anyone recommend any study material? I don't want to take a course; I don't have time for an instructor to teach at the pace of a group. I do have the Kaplan books (thanks to friends!) it has a bunch of practice tests in a book called endurance, then a bunch of questions in mastery. should I just practice? I can enroll in local practice tests through kaplan or blackstone each (or almost each) weekend. If i had my timing down better on RC I could do much better. LR I'm pretty much solid, I feel extremely well prepared in it. IIII dunno. I've heard of people lowering the PT time from 35 min to 30, or 27, or whatever minutes to improve timing. I think that was my worst killer on the June LSAT (besides the last game, but I had over 10 min to do it. didnt miss a single quest. outside that damn game).rad law wrote:Honestly, that would be better than applying with your current score, because if you did 10 hours a week you would already have studied more than the first 2 times.darby girl wrote: I work 9 hours a day and take a full time course load of classes. I don't possibly see how I could devote more than a few hours each weekend... I would say at most 10 hours throughout the week...
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
Credited. There are tons of people on here with jobs, families, full time class loads, etc. who find time to study. Darby, getting a few more LSAT points would be the equivalent of UF or FSU sending you a check for thousands (possibly tens of thousands) of dollars. That's a lot of money.rad law wrote:I wouldn't say you're at your peak, considering you barely studied.darby girl wrote:But that was my peek, so I'm worried I won't do better.
Also, as to your last post... I'd say Kaplan Mastery is a great place to start. Do lots and lots of problems from there before you even touch another PT. Then start to work on your endurance.
I really feel like you have a lot of room for growth.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
I'm not the best person to ask. Maybe ask the LSAT prep forum?darby girl wrote:very true. also, what should i study? LG was my BEST section prior (got 0-1 wrong on each PT) but on the actual test it is what killed me. I only got 1 right on the last game. I got almost none wrong on LR, and RC was better than usual, but it is usually my worst (ironic, huh, for an english major...) does anyone recommend any study material? I don't want to take a course; I don't have time for an instructor to teach at the pace of a group. I do have the Kaplan books (thanks to friends!) it has a bunch of practice tests in a book called endurance, then a bunch of questions in mastery. should I just practice? I can enroll in local practice tests through kaplan or blackstone each (or almost each) weekend. If i had my timing down better on RC I could do much better. LR I'm pretty much solid, I feel extremely well prepared in it. IIII dunno. I've heard of people lowering the PT time from 35 min to 30, or 27, or whatever minutes to improve timing. I think that was my worst killer on the June LSAT (besides the last game, but I had over 10 min to do it. didnt miss a single quest. outside that damn game).rad law wrote:Honestly, that would be better than applying with your current score, because if you did 10 hours a week you would already have studied more than the first 2 times.darby girl wrote: I work 9 hours a day and take a full time course load of classes. I don't possibly see how I could devote more than a few hours each weekend... I would say at most 10 hours throughout the week...
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
Me and radlaw suck at the LSAT. 168 for the loss.
But this is a really solid place to start: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=41657
But this is a really solid place to start: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=41657
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Barbie
- Posts: 3746
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
psht a 168 is freakin ballinnnnromothesavior wrote:Me and radlaw suck at the LSAT. 168 for the loss.
But this is a really solid place to start: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=41657
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
PM'd with a short recap of my LSAT story.darby girl wrote:psht a 168 is freakin ballinnnnromothesavior wrote:Me and radlaw suck at the LSAT. 168 for the loss.
But this is a really solid place to start: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=41657
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
I wanna hear too.rad law wrote:PM'd with a short recap of my LSAT story.darby girl wrote:psht a 168 is freakin ballinnnnromothesavior wrote:Me and radlaw suck at the LSAT. 168 for the loss.
But this is a really solid place to start: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=41657
- Jack Smirks
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
Darby you have a ton of room for improvement. I improved 18 points which is more than most people but I took 20+ practice tests and worked through 6 Princeton Review books. Honestly, the LSAT is not a test you want to fuck around with and wonder if you could have done better come application time. Not to mention the scholarship money you could possibly receive as a result of your efforts. So my advice is to hit the books, princeton review, kaplan, the bibles, whatever, and do as many real LSAT PT's you can get your hands on.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
romothesavior wrote:Me and radlaw suck at the LSAT. 168 for the loss.
- Barbie
- Posts: 3746
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
romo always wants to be includeddddromothesavior wrote:I wanna hear too.rad law wrote:PM'd with a short recap of my LSAT story.darby girl wrote:psht a 168 is freakin ballinnnnromothesavior wrote:Me and radlaw suck at the LSAT. 168 for the loss.
But this is a really solid place to start: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=41657
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
PM'dromothesavior wrote:I wanna hear too.rad law wrote:PM'd with a short recap of my LSAT story.darby girl wrote:psht a 168 is freakin ballinnnnromothesavior wrote:Me and radlaw suck at the LSAT. 168 for the loss.
But this is a really solid place to start: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=41657
- Barbie
- Posts: 3746
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
I suppose I need to get over my desire to have things sent out Sept 1st then.naterj wrote:Darby you have a ton of room for improvement. I improved 18 points which is more than most people but I took 20+ practice tests and worked through 6 Princeton Review books. Honestly, the LSAT is not a test you want to fuck around with and wonder if you could have done better come application time. Not to mention the scholarship money you could possibly receive as a result of your efforts. So my advice is to hit the books, princeton review, kaplan, the bibles, whatever, and do as many real LSAT PT's you can get your hands on.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
darby girl wrote:I suppose I need to get over my desire to have things sent out Sept 1st then.naterj wrote:Darby you have a ton of room for improvement. I improved 18 points which is more than most people but I took 20+ practice tests and worked through 6 Princeton Review books. Honestly, the LSAT is not a test you want to fuck around with and wonder if you could have done better come application time. Not to mention the scholarship money you could possibly receive as a result of your efforts. So my advice is to hit the books, princeton review, kaplan, the bibles, whatever, and do as many real LSAT PT's you can get your hands on.
Extra 6 points on the LSAT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Applying a month earlier
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
You can still get the stuff out sans LSAT.darby girl wrote:I suppose I need to get over my desire to have things sent out Sept 1st then.naterj wrote:Darby you have a ton of room for improvement. I improved 18 points which is more than most people but I took 20+ practice tests and worked through 6 Princeton Review books. Honestly, the LSAT is not a test you want to fuck around with and wonder if you could have done better come application time. Not to mention the scholarship money you could possibly receive as a result of your efforts. So my advice is to hit the books, princeton review, kaplan, the bibles, whatever, and do as many real LSAT PT's you can get your hands on.
- Jack Smirks
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
Yeah just have everything ready to go and then knockout that Oct LSAT. No worries.
- Barbie
- Posts: 3746
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
rad law wrote:You can still get the stuff out sans LSAT.darby girl wrote:I suppose I need to get over my desire to have things sent out Sept 1st then.naterj wrote:Darby you have a ton of room for improvement. I improved 18 points which is more than most people but I took 20+ practice tests and worked through 6 Princeton Review books. Honestly, the LSAT is not a test you want to fuck around with and wonder if you could have done better come application time. Not to mention the scholarship money you could possibly receive as a result of your efforts. So my advice is to hit the books, princeton review, kaplan, the bibles, whatever, and do as many real LSAT PT's you can get your hands on.
is there any point to that??? and it isn't true nor likely i will get 6 extra points!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
Yeah bc when the score comes out it will automatically be forwarded to them, completing the app.darby girl wrote:rad law wrote:You can still get the stuff out sans LSAT.darby girl wrote:I suppose I need to get over my desire to have things sent out Sept 1st then.naterj wrote:Darby you have a ton of room for improvement. I improved 18 points which is more than most people but I took 20+ practice tests and worked through 6 Princeton Review books. Honestly, the LSAT is not a test you want to fuck around with and wonder if you could have done better come application time. Not to mention the scholarship money you could possibly receive as a result of your efforts. So my advice is to hit the books, princeton review, kaplan, the bibles, whatever, and do as many real LSAT PT's you can get your hands on.
is there any point to that??? and it isn't true nor likely i will get 6 extra points!
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
If you actually study it is extremely likely.darby girl wrote: is there any point to that??? and it isn't true nor likely i will get 6 extra points!
- Barbie
- Posts: 3746
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
I know people that did LOTs of studying between their first/second/third tries and did Worse!!!!!!!!!!romothesavior wrote:If you actually study it is extremely likely.darby girl wrote: is there any point to that??? and it isn't true nor likely i will get 6 extra points!
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
Statistically, going by the stuff the LSAC publishes, most people do better.darby girl wrote:I know people that did LOTs of studying between their first/second/third tries and did Worse!!!!!!!!!!romothesavior wrote:If you actually study it is extremely likely.darby girl wrote: is there any point to that??? and it isn't true nor likely i will get 6 extra points!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
And I know lots of people who gave a halfhearted effort the first time (see: ~6 PTs) and studied their butts off on a retake and did 10+ points better. They went from looking at Tier 2 schools and are now looking at T14 schools. I personally improved 6 points (honestly could have been a little more) and had a whole new list of schools because of it. Retaking was one of the best decisions I've ever made.darby girl wrote:I know people that did LOTs of studying between their first/second/third tries and did Worse!!!!!!!!!!romothesavior wrote:If you actually study it is extremely likely.darby girl wrote: is there any point to that??? and it isn't true nor likely i will get 6 extra points!
But I'll agree that a retake is worthless if you don't put in the requisite time and energy.
- Jack Smirks
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
Yeah Darby your original study plan was a joke. 6 practice tests isn't shit, I had improved quite a bit by my 6th but I plateaued for quite awhile. It takes time to have substantial breakthroughs and I can almost guarantee your only at a fraction of your potential. Do 10 more PT's and then go ahead and look me up on TLS and thank me.
- queenlizzie13
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:30 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
Yeah, that's what I did. Definitely first time around was half-hearted. I did 4PT's. This time I did about 12 total (4 full length - 5 sections, the rest 4 sections). Definitely going to do more 5 sections this time. My last section = most missed out of the entire test. I was +9, but should have been more...hence, third retake.romothesavior wrote:And I know lots of people who gave a halfhearted effort the first time (see: ~6 PTs) and studied their butts off on a retake and did 10+ points better. They went from looking at Tier 2 schools and are now looking at T14 schools. I personally improved 6 points (honestly could have been a little more) and had a whole new list of schools because of it. Retaking was one of the best decisions I've ever made.darby girl wrote:I know people that did LOTs of studying between their first/second/third tries and did Worse!!!!!!!!!!romothesavior wrote:If you actually study it is extremely likely.darby girl wrote: is there any point to that??? and it isn't true nor likely i will get 6 extra points!
But I'll agree that a retake is worthless if you don't put in the requisite time and energy.
- Barbie
- Posts: 3746
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Chances for people w/ lower numbers!
How about I study some each week and take a PT a week until school starts, which will be ab 7 tests. If one of them is over 163, I'll retake. If I'm scoring in the 150's then ... I suck!naterj wrote:Yeah Darby your original study plan was a joke. 6 practice tests isn't shit, I had improved quite a bit by my 6th but I plateaued for quite awhile. It takes time to have substantial breakthroughs and I can almost guarantee your only at a fraction of your potential. Do 10 more PT's and then go ahead and look me up on TLS and thank me.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login