3 years of undergrad = good enough? Forum
- rftdd888
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 3:08 am
3 years of undergrad = good enough?
not that i would consider this, but i'm curious:
http://www.abanet.org/legaled/standards ... apter5.pdf
says that you must have a bachelors degree or 3/4s of the work required for one?
does this mean one could conceivably complete 3 years of college for 90 credits towards a degree, then dip out and go to law school?
http://www.abanet.org/legaled/standards ... apter5.pdf
says that you must have a bachelors degree or 3/4s of the work required for one?
does this mean one could conceivably complete 3 years of college for 90 credits towards a degree, then dip out and go to law school?
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
I think it's worded like that so that they can extend offers of admission to those still in UG. You still have to have a bachelor's to enroll.
- nealric
- Posts: 4391
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
You can graduate from undergrad in 3 years and go to law school. That's what I did.
- rftdd888
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 3:08 am
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
alright, two different responses. any more certainty?
- daesonesb
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:18 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
This is no diff then the other. You need a bachelors. How fast you do it is up to you.nealric wrote:You can graduate from undergrad in 3 years and go to law school. That's what I did.
/thread
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Unitas
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
From what I recall you can attend some crappy LSs without a bachelors. Cooley comes to mind, but you wouldn't really want to attend any of them if you have any other options. Most will say you shouldn't attend them at all.daesonesb wrote:This is no diff then the other. You need a bachelors. How fast you do it is up to you.nealric wrote:You can graduate from undergrad in 3 years and go to law school. That's what I did.
/thread
- gwuorbust
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:37 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
From Tulane's website:
Q-4. Do I need to complete my undergraduate degree?
A-4.
Tulane Law School is one of a handful of law schools that will allow exceptional students to begin law school without a baccalaureate degree. (We require 3/4 of the work toward a B.A. or B.S., and almost all of the credits must be in courses of substantial intellectual content.) To be admitted without a degree, students must have very strong academic records.
Q-4. Do I need to complete my undergraduate degree?
A-4.
Tulane Law School is one of a handful of law schools that will allow exceptional students to begin law school without a baccalaureate degree. (We require 3/4 of the work toward a B.A. or B.S., and almost all of the credits must be in courses of substantial intellectual content.) To be admitted without a degree, students must have very strong academic records.
- pjo
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
Honestly this is just kind of dumb. No offense. Just get/finish your bachelors degree. If not for any other reason, at least because it broadens your initial horizons and gives you something interesting to talk about. If you really want to go early, just finish it in 3 yrs. Regardless, even if you could go to law school without a bachelors, I think most firms would frown upon such a practice when it comes time to hire someone
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:47 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
You need an undergraduate degree to enroll which is not limited to a bachelors.eskimo wrote:I think it's worded like that so that they can extend offers of admission to those still in UG. You still have to have a bachelor's to enroll.
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
"Standard 502. EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTSHookem09 wrote:You need an undergraduate degree to enroll which is not limited to a bachelors.eskimo wrote:I think it's worded like that so that they can extend offers of admission to those still in UG. You still have to have a bachelor's to enroll.
(a) A law school shall require for admission to its J.D. degree program a bachelor’s
degree, or successful completion of three-fourths of the work acceptable for a bachelor’s
degree, from an institution that is accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the
Department of Education."
502 (b) goes on to say that anything else falls under "extraordinary circumstances." I was just leaving out the extraordinary circumstances clause, since those cases are rare.
- Unitas
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
Yeah, but some schools you can attend without a Bachelor's degree or ever getting one... They just usually aren't worth attending.eskimo wrote:"Standard 502. EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTSHookem09 wrote:You need an undergraduate degree to enroll which is not limited to a bachelors.eskimo wrote:I think it's worded like that so that they can extend offers of admission to those still in UG. You still have to have a bachelor's to enroll.
(a) A law school shall require for admission to its J.D. degree program a bachelor’s
degree, or successful completion of three-fourths of the work acceptable for a bachelor’s
degree, from an institution that is accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the
Department of Education."
502 (b) goes on to say that anything else falls under "extraordinary circumstances." I was just leaving out the extraordinary circumstances clause, since those cases are rare.
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
I know, I just think that most schools that people discuss on TLS aren't those schools, so they're not really relevant in this case. 

-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:47 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
Exactly. I know some programs, I believe it's pharmacology (I think, let me research it) allows students to join the program either straight out of high school, two years of undergrad, or with a Bachelors degree. So some students graduate college without a Bachelor's but with a Pharm.D (Doctor of Pharmacy) which is acceptable for law schools and the ABA. Otherwise, why else would some schools like USC have a Pharm.D/JD program?eskimo wrote:"Standard 502. EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTSHookem09 wrote:You need an undergraduate degree to enroll which is not limited to a bachelors.eskimo wrote:I think it's worded like that so that they can extend offers of admission to those still in UG. You still have to have a bachelor's to enroll.
(a) A law school shall require for admission to its J.D. degree program a bachelor’s
degree, or successful completion of three-fourths of the work acceptable for a bachelor’s
degree, from an institution that is accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the
Department of Education."
502 (b) goes on to say that anything else falls under "extraordinary circumstances." I was just leaving out the extraordinary circumstances clause, since those cases are rare.
I wouldn't call pharmacology schools "not worth attending". My brother makes $110,000 a year and he graduated from USC's school of pharmacy. He's 24 for what it's worth.Yeah, but some schools you can attend without a Bachelor's degree or ever getting one... They just usually aren't worth attending.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
Hookem09 wrote:I wouldn't call pharmacology schools "not worth attending". My brother makes $110,000 a year and he graduated from USC's school of pharmacy. He's 24 for what it's worth.Yeah, but some schools you can attend without a Bachelor's degree or ever getting one... They just usually aren't worth attending.
Law schools, dude. Law schools.
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: 3 years of undergrad = good enough?
kalvano wrote:Hookem09 wrote:I wouldn't call pharmacology schools "not worth attending". My brother makes $110,000 a year and he graduated from USC's school of pharmacy. He's 24 for what it's worth.Yeah, but some schools you can attend without a Bachelor's degree or ever getting one... They just usually aren't worth attending.
Law schools, dude. Law schools.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login