Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage? Forum
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:53 pm
Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
Ivy League schools and other top-notch schools are known to have preference for legacies in their undergraduate admissions.
Does such advantage still exist for law school admissions (ivy league + stanford and other top law schools)?
Does such advantage still exist for law school admissions (ivy league + stanford and other top law schools)?
- jks289
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:42 pm
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
Most anecdotal evidence says no, unless relative is major financial donor.MagnumLifeStyle wrote:Ivy League schools and other top-notch schools are known to have preference for legacies in their undergraduate admissions.
Does such advantage still exist for law school admissions (ivy league + stanford and other top law schools)?
- Dr. Strangelove
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
I doubt it. Most people go to college. Most people don't go to law school.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
I think schools might have some small preference for students of families that go to that school. But you still have to have the right numbers.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:10 pm
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
i was on the border at USC and got a reject as a legacy... so I say no.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- superflush
- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:45 am
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
It probably depends on how strong the legacy connection is.MagnumLifeStyle wrote:Ivy League schools and other top-notch schools are known to have preference for legacies in their undergraduate admissions.
Does such advantage still exist for law school admissions (ivy league + stanford and other top law schools)?
If you have a 4 or 5 generation line that went to the law school, I definitely think there will be an advantage.
Just a sole generation without any major donations might only have a slight advantage.
- sayan
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 7:05 am
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
Undergraduate admission offices look for a well-rounded applicant on dimensions such as personality and leadership ability that are sometimes tough to measure and record. Thus using legacy status as a proxy of a successful upbringing that cultivates the aforementioned qualities is sometimes useful for these admissions.
On the other hand, as we all know, law school is almost completely numbers focused and academically oriented. Even the soft factors that really help are typically related to academia (e.g., published papers) or are much better proxies of personality and leadership capability than legacy status (e.g., prestigious scholarships) which aren't available to students just entering undergraduate colleges.
On the other hand, as we all know, law school is almost completely numbers focused and academically oriented. Even the soft factors that really help are typically related to academia (e.g., published papers) or are much better proxies of personality and leadership capability than legacy status (e.g., prestigious scholarships) which aren't available to students just entering undergraduate colleges.
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:05 am
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
sayan wrote:Undergraduate admission offices look for a well-rounded applicant on dimensions such as personality and leadership ability that are sometimes tough to measure and record. Thus using legacy status as a proxy of a successful upbringing that cultivates the aforementioned qualities is sometimes useful for these admissions.
You don't actually believe that this is the reason, do you?
-
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
jks289 wrote:Most anecdotal evidence says no, unless relative is major financial donor.MagnumLifeStyle wrote:Ivy League schools and other top-notch schools are known to have preference for legacies in their undergraduate admissions.
Does such advantage still exist for law school admissions (ivy league + stanford and other top law schools)?
This. When the relative in question can schedule a lunch with university brass at his convenience, his kid is getting in unless his numbers are beyond awful. Big difference between "I'm so happy I went to school here" legacy and "We're so happy you went to school here" legacy.
- Antipodean
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:40 pm
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
And of course the public university equivalent: My relative can have your funding cut.ScaredWorkedBored wrote:This. When the relative in question can schedule a lunch with university brass at his convenience, his kid is getting in unless his numbers are beyond awful. Big difference between "I'm so happy I went to school here" legacy and "We're so happy you went to school here" legacy.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 7:11 am
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
How does anecdotal evidence say no?jks289 wrote:Most anecdotal evidence says no, unless relative is major financial donor.MagnumLifeStyle wrote:Ivy League schools and other top-notch schools are known to have preference for legacies in their undergraduate admissions.
Does such advantage still exist for law school admissions (ivy league + stanford and other top law schools)?
Are you saying that a graduate from Alaska College with a 3.5 is equivalent to a Yale 3.5 in the eyes of admissions officers?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 8:54 am
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
I think a lot of schools give you a small bump if you're borderline and have strong connections to the school; thereby being more likely to matriculate if accepted. To the extent that being a legacy fulfils that role, it may give you a bump.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 8:54 am
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
To the admissions people at Yale? Yes, that person is an auto-reject.SuperFreak wrote:Are you saying that a graduate from Alaska College with a 3.5 is equivalent to a Yale 3.5 in the eyes of admissions officers?
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 7:11 am
Re: Do "Legacies" Still Have the Same Advantage?
Just to make sure, we're talking about Alaska College, right?theLastZion wrote:To the admissions people at Yale? Yes, that person is an auto-reject.SuperFreak wrote:Are you saying that a graduate from Alaska College with a 3.5 is equivalent to a Yale 3.5 in the eyes of admissions officers?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login