Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT Forum
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:26 pm
Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
Here are my stats:
2.43 gpa poli sci major Gpa 3.0 upward trend
Lsat 176
URM (Peruvian female/ born in the U.S. but immigrant parents)
Americorp
Peace Corp
Work with non-profit offering legal services to the elderly
I'm applying to Alabama for sure since I have in-state status. What would be a good possible reach school?
2.43 gpa poli sci major Gpa 3.0 upward trend
Lsat 176
URM (Peruvian female/ born in the U.S. but immigrant parents)
Americorp
Peace Corp
Work with non-profit offering legal services to the elderly
I'm applying to Alabama for sure since I have in-state status. What would be a good possible reach school?
- zozin
- Posts: 3732
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
Where do you want to go?
- soonergirl
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 12:26 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
Northwestern will give you a full ride.
- booboo
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
If not a flame, two things:
One, you are not URM.
Two, try applying ED to NU, pretty much your only shot at T14.
One, you are not URM.
Two, try applying ED to NU, pretty much your only shot at T14.
- zozin
- Posts: 3732
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
She might get in, she's definitely not getting a full ride, probably little to no tuition. It's the price you pay for being a splitter.soonergirl wrote:Northwestern will give you a full ride.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- soonergirl
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 12:26 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
yeah, I was kind of joking about that part, but I guarantee you she gets in.zozin wrote:She might get in, she's definitely not getting a full ride, probably little to no tuition. It's the price you pay for being a splitter.soonergirl wrote:Northwestern will give you a full ride.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:26 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
"One, you are not URM."
My parents are Aymara, a Native minority in Peru.
My parents are Aymara, a Native minority in Peru.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:26 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
If I had perfect stats Georgetown, but right now Notre Dame is my top reach choice.zozin wrote:Where do you want to go?
- JTX
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:23 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
x
Last edited by JTX on Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- zozin
- Posts: 3732
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
Since you're not considered by LSAC to be an URM, both are out. Illinois and Boston U. are your top ranked schools that you might get in.lazyahole wrote:If I had perfect stats Georgetown, but right now Notre Dame is my top reach choice.zozin wrote:Where do you want to go?
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:26 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
Wow, I thought all Latinos were URM, especially indigenous peoples.zozin wrote:Since you're not considered by LSAC to be an URM, both are out. Illinois and Boston U. are your top ranked schools that you might get in.lazyahole wrote:If I had perfect stats Georgetown, but right now Notre Dame is my top reach choice.zozin wrote:Where do you want to go?
- r2b2ct
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:33 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
I think you have a good shot if you ED to Northwestern. WUSTL is also a good place to apply since they'll probably throw a lot of money at you for that LSAT and are ranked 19. Also, although you are technically not a URM, I think your heritage will add a lot to your application.
Congratulations on killing the LSAT btw.
Congratulations on killing the LSAT btw.
- DoctorNick189
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:21 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
FWIW, WUSTL threw me very little money 3.0/176, applied early.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- thalassocrat
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:07 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
No; though you are a minority, URM refers specifically to four minorities that are underrepresented in law schools based on their percentage of the overall US population: African Americans, Native Americans (I think this is limited to US tribes, or maybe North American?), Mexican Americans, and Puerto Ricans. Other minorities either aren't underrepresented or don't have enough of a presence in the US population, I think. This write-up probably explains it better. You should still write a diversity statement and make sure to mention it in your application, since it can still help to make you more attractive to adcomms.lazyahole wrote:Wow, I thought all Latinos were URM, especially indigenous peoples.zozin wrote:Since you're not considered by LSAC to be an URM, both are out. Illinois and Boston U. are your top ranked schools that you might get in.lazyahole wrote:If I had perfect stats Georgetown, but right now Notre Dame is my top reach choice.zozin wrote:Where do you want to go?
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:26 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
No; though you are a minority, URM refers specifically to four minorities that are underrepresented in law schools based on their percentage of the overall US population: African Americans, Native Americans (I think this is limited to US tribes, or maybe North American?), Mexican Americans, and Puerto Ricans. Other minorities either aren't underrepresented or don't have enough of a presence in the US population, I think. This write-up probably explains it better. You should still write a diversity statement and make sure to mention it in your application, since it can still help to make you more attractive to adcomms.[/quote]
I'll definitely do that. The cuteness of your avatar distracted me for a bit, cuteness overload.
I'll definitely do that. The cuteness of your avatar distracted me for a bit, cuteness overload.
- MURPH
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:20 am
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
If you are Native American you can get in. The adcoms won't hesitate to let you get by as native because you boost their diversity and because they won't have any guidelines on what to do with someone of your ethnicity. Check the box for Native American, not for Hispanic and you'll have a ticket to ride in most of the T14.
- JustDude
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:07 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
Quoted to show, why it is risky to follow advices on TLSMURPH wrote:If you are Native American you can get in. The adcoms won't hesitate to let you get by as native because you boost their diversity and because they won't have any guidelines on what to do with someone of your ethnicity. Check the box for Native American, not for Hispanic and you'll have a ticket to ride in most of the T14.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- clintonius
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:50 am
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
Argument can be made for truthfulness (it says "American," not "North American" or "US American").
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
Georgetown is worth a shot, so is Northwestern.lazyahole wrote:If I had perfect stats Georgetown, but right now Notre Dame is my top reach choice.zozin wrote:Where do you want to go?
- JustDude
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:07 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
clintonius wrote:Argument can be made for truthfulness (it says "American," not "North American" or "US American").
Sometimes it also says Indian Not feather indian or dot indian
- MURPH
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:20 am
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
Clintonius, it is more than an argument to be made. It is just a fact. Her ancestors were in the western hemisphere before 1492. That is it. She is native. Look, I'll even prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt:
From Wikipedia, the ultimate reference source of all human knowledge
From Wikipedia, the ultimate reference source of all human knowledge
Even if someone wanted to split hairs and say that Native American =/= American Indians (the term used on most applications) it would still amount to the same thing:The term Native Americans may refer to:
In its broadest sense, the entirety of the indigenous peoples of the American continents:
andAmerican Indian From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from American indian) American Indian may refer to:
Native Americans in the United States
Indigenous people of the Americas
The Aymara have existed in the Andes in what is now Western Bolivia, Southern Peru and Northern Chile for over 2,000 years
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:04 am
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
You don't have the authority to determine what sense LSAC intends for their words to be interpreted.MURPH wrote:Clintonius, it is more than an argument to be made. It is just a fact. Her ancestors were in the western hemisphere before 1492. That is it. She is native. Look, I'll even prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt:
From Wikipedia, the ultimate reference source of all human knowledgeandThe term Native Americans may refer to:
In its broadest sense, the entirety of the indigenous peoples of the American continents:The Aymara have existed in the Andes in what is now Western Bolivia, Southern Peru and Northern Chile for over 2,000 years
- MURPH
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:20 am
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
What! That is an outrage. Every reader interprets the text for his or herself. Fail Comparative Literature 101. 

-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
Agreed. I would say mark "Native American" and "Latino" and write "Aymara" for Native American tribal affiliation. It will at least get the adcomm to look up the Aymara.clintonius wrote:Argument can be made for truthfulness (it says "American," not "North American" or "US American").
Anyway, Northwestern. Try some other lower T14s as well. You're definitely interesting enough (minority group, tons of great charitable work) to have a chance at T14s other than Northwestern.
I would apply to:
UVA (splitter-friendly)
Northwestern (splitter-friendly)
Georgetown
Vanderbilt
WUSTL (splitter-friendly)
UIUC (splitter-friendly)
GW (gives money to a ton of people)
Alabama (In-state)
Washington & Lee (splitter-friendly)
And a few other schools that you really like.
Last edited by BenJ on Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
- wackjickham
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: Super splitter 2.43 gpa 176 LSAT
I agree, from OP's description it sounds like she would fall under the category of "native American" rather than Hispanic.
The question is, does affirmative action work for native groups that our government DIDN'T directly screw out of their entire lives?
The question is, does affirmative action work for native groups that our government DIDN'T directly screw out of their entire lives?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login