
I plan on mainly applying to schools in bigger, more liberal cities but I don't want to put any of this on my app just to get it thrown away because the adcomm thinks I'm some crazy, cage breaking, church burning radical.
They're the only organizations I'm apart of, but other soft factors (I guess) would be being cuban, previously a legal assistant and still do semi-freelance legal work for a local attorney, lots of volunteering, and that's about it. My dream school is NYU but I'm planning on applying to all of the T14 schools in urban areas (UPENN, Berkeley, Chicago and NW), plus quite a few schools from T30 and up, then UF (I'm from FL) and Lewis and Clark. I guess I need to find a PC organization to get intodp73816 wrote:If you are going to apply to the Notre Dame's and Boston College's of the world, I would definitely not put it. If you are going to apply to the more liberal schools (Berkeley and Northeastern come to mind) it wouldn't be a bad thing - it might actually help. My advice is that, for the average school, if you even have an ounce of trepidation over putting it in, don't. Hopefully you have other EC's that are a little more endearing. Not to say that it is a bad thing, but it is simply not as PC as many things that can be easily categorized as "good" or "harmful" to your chances.
jerjon2 wrote:I would try to emphasize the animal rights thing. I don't think anyone is going to have much negative to say about that. Especially if your application has that sort of PI bent anyway. As far as the atheist organization, I wouldn't mention it anywhere. All it takes is one adcomm member at even the most liberal school to feel something (maybe even subconsciously) that makes them against your application to have a negative effect. I don't think that possibility is worth whatever minuscule boost you would get from being in another club.
Good luck
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
DON'T DO IT. All you need is ONE person on the admissions committee to take issue with that. Many choose to dodge the disclosure of religion affiliation entirely, IMO it is unnecessary as it relates to your potential law school performance (unless of course you are seeking admission to a Jesuit university and are Catholic, etc.) Also never put that on your CV/resume, you just never know. . . .dp73816 wrote:jerjon2 wrote:I would try to emphasize the animal rights thing. I don't think anyone is going to have much negative to say about that. Especially if your application has that sort of PI bent anyway. As far as the atheist organization, I wouldn't mention it anywhere. All it takes is one adcomm member at even the most liberal school to feel something (maybe even subconsciously) that makes them against your application to have a negative effect. I don't think that possibility is worth whatever minuscule boost you would get from being in another club.
Good luck
Agreed. Its really just too much of a risk. The more I think about it, its an unknown, unquantifiable factor thats kind of arbitrary. You have URM status - that, along with some ok softs, should be enough.
That's actually very helpful. I'd rather not compromise my values but every lawyer I personally know is super religious (like, to the point that I lost a great potential LOR b/c they found out I was an atheist.), but maybe that's because I live in Florida. Now I'll have to keep considering itthalassocrat wrote:I might be the only one who will disagree here, but I don't think it would be as much a killer as people are saying. The people who think atheists worship Satan don't tend to be the highly educated members of academic institutions. FWIW I wrote my PS about being an atheist in the Bible Belt, and with the exception of Berkeley my cycle went exactly as I expected it to. I even got comments from two different schools about how they loved it. I did avoid the known religious schools, though.
That having been said, leave it off if you're that worried. I'm just trying to offer an alternate perspective.
Don't consider it.tasteofred wrote:That's actually very helpful. I'd rather not compromise my values but every lawyer I personally know is super religious (like, to the point that I lost a great potential LOR b/c they found out I was an atheist.), but maybe that's because I live in Florida. Now I'll have to keep considering itthalassocrat wrote:I might be the only one who will disagree here, but I don't think it would be as much a killer as people are saying. The people who think atheists worship Satan don't tend to be the highly educated members of academic institutions. FWIW I wrote my PS about being an atheist in the Bible Belt, and with the exception of Berkeley my cycle went exactly as I expected it to. I even got comments from two different schools about how they loved it. I did avoid the known religious schools, though.
That having been said, leave it off if you're that worried. I'm just trying to offer an alternate perspective.Thank you.
And good job with the PS, I'm not sure I'd be able to take the risk.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Wait a sec. Atheists don't worship Satan!?mb88 wrote:A frighteningly large portion of the country still believes that atheists worship Satan.
As an atheist myself, I'm with the others. Bad idea to include on an app (besides Berkeley, probably).
UMN actually did a study that identified atheists as the most hated minority in America, by far. I've personally lost countless friendships and even familial relationships over it. And I'm probably one of the most moral people I know. I hope I eventually get to live in a world where that isn't the case, but one in five might be a good estimate outside of the academic communities and rebellious teenagers.wired wrote:Trying to be as objective as possible, but I think many agnostics/atheists view themselves as many very religious people - a fringe group that is bound to have a hater in a group of five people.
I am familiar with that study, though I think saying, "Most hated minority in America" is mis-describing its findings. (I know the media used this tag line a lot; maybe they are referring to a different study. I am thinking of the one found at http://www.soc.umn.edu/~hartmann/files/ ... 0other.pdf) Still, I don't doubt that atheism has a stigma associated with it that conjures up negative feelings for many people.tasteofred wrote:UMN actually did a study that identified atheists as the most hated minority in America, by far. I've personally lost countless friendships and even familial relationships over it. And I'm probably one of the most moral people I know. I hope I eventually get to live in a world where that isn't the case, but one in five might be a good estimate outside of the academic communities and rebellious teenagers.wired wrote:Trying to be as objective as possible, but I think many agnostics/atheists view themselves as many very religious people - a fringe group that is bound to have a hater in a group of five people.
You mean ethical! Get it right. Damn Atheists. Even Kantian morality requires a metaphysical supernatural entity.tasteofred wrote:UMN actually did a study that identified atheists as the most hated minority in America, by far. I've personally lost countless friendships and even familial relationships over it. And I'm probably one of the most moral people I know. I hope I eventually get to live in a world where that isn't the case, but one in five might be a good estimate outside of the academic communities and rebellious teenagers.wired wrote:Trying to be as objective as possible, but I think many agnostics/atheists view themselves as many very religious people - a fringe group that is bound to have a hater in a group of five people.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I also agree. My personal statement was about going to a Christian school and the process of ultimately rejecting fundamentalist Christianity. Some people told me it was a horrible idea that would bias the adcomms, but my cycle went as expected (I got into most of my top choices - including one in OKLAHOMA). I admit my PS was risky and had the potential to be disastrous. But I spent a lot of time making sure I said everything just right and was not dismissive of religious beliefs. All that to say, I don't think the adcomm will be turned off if you've presented yourself as an open-minded, reasonable person in other places in your app.YCrevolution wrote:+1thalassocrat wrote:I might be the only one who will disagree here, but I don't think it would be as much a killer as people are saying. The people who think atheists worship Satan don't tend to be the highly educated members of academic institutions. FWIW I wrote my PS about being an atheist in the Bible Belt, and with the exception of Berkeley my cycle went exactly as I expected it to. I even got comments from two different schools about how they loved it. I did avoid the known religious schools, though.
That having been said, leave it off if you're that worried. I'm just trying to offer an alternate perspective.
Thanks for that! I wish more people understood that religion does not precede morality.Rock Chalk wrote:There was nothing wrong with his use of "moral." Nothing about morality is inherently supernatural.erniesto wrote:You mean ethical! Get it right. Damn Atheists. Even Kantian morality requires a metaphysical supernatural entity.tasteofred wrote:UMN actually did a study that identified atheists as the most hated minority in America, by far. I've personally lost countless friendships and even familial relationships over it. And I'm probably one of the most moral people I know. I hope I eventually get to live in a world where that isn't the case, but one in five might be a good estimate outside of the academic communities and rebellious teenagers.wired wrote:Trying to be as objective as possible, but I think many agnostics/atheists view themselves as many very religious people - a fringe group that is bound to have a hater in a group of five people.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Yea, not sounding arrogant or like a plain old jackass is key. I'd say that goes for everything else on your application anyway, but that should be a no brainer.tomhobbes wrote:I included the fact that I was a member of an atheist club on my resume, and religion actually played a prominent role in my personal statement. It didn't hurt me at all. I actually think it may have helped me. You just have to make sure you don't sound arrogant.
Your rhetoric is off. Sorry. Metaphysics precedes morality. You can't prescribe to a morality without prescribing to a metaphysics. You have to go by faith to determine right vs. wrong as there is no absolute existential truth behind either without that faith. You can, however, acknowledge that morality exists without prescribing to its truths, thus being ethical.tasteofred wrote:Thanks for that! I wish more people understood that religion does not precede morality.Rock Chalk wrote:There was nothing wrong with his use of "moral." Nothing about morality is inherently supernatural.erniesto wrote:
You mean ethical! Get it right. Damn Atheists. Even Kantian morality requires a metaphysical supernatural entity.
& I'm a girl, btw. Everyone on this forum keeps calling me a dude
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login