Is a 3.5 at Hofstra seen as a better marker than a 3.0 at Columbia for undergrad? I have friends who left highly respected undergrads to go to easier schools where they went from 2.0's to a 4.0. Do law schools at all care that some schools don't give out A+'s, and that in most of those classes, only 10% of students get an A or is it all the same to them?
I am asking this, because at my undergrad it was virtually impossible to have a 3.8. I was given awards at graduation for having a 3.6, but now almost feel like I have to have an addendum explaining the discrepancy between my LSAT and GPA. Call me Mr. Kfetcher, but that makes me angry
