. Forum

[roranoa]

.

[Cupidity]

I'm living proof.

Softs don't matter at all ever. Not even kidding. Any lack of softs can easily be compensated for by an interesting PS.

[romothesavior]

Someone please come post a big picture of fire

[Gamecubesupreme]

Softs matter to law school the same way a girl's personality matters to guys. Which is to say not very much at all.

[roranoa]

.

[Grizz]

Someone please come post a big picture of fire

No problem.

[huzhongxiaohe]

I'm living proof.

Softs don't matter at all ever. Not even kidding. Any lack of softs can easily be compensated for by an interesting PS.

what were you're softs? A few people I asked were really modest about there softs whereas it seemed to me they've done a lot.

Btw, it says "Good softs" on your profile.

I concur with Cupidity (gah, I don't concur with "cupidity"), basically.

Unless it's really really really great softs and you're applying to Yale or Stanford when you already have good numbers.

[calicocat]

Softs matter to law school the same way a girl's personality matters to guys. Which is to say not very much at all.

[roranoa]

.

[Richie Tenenbaum]

As I feel lack the of preparation for the June LSAT, I also feel how much decent EC stuff I lack

to write on my resume.

So I wonder now and then if I should start some new EC stuff to write on my resume
when I apply for law school this fall.

What do people here think? Is it really a numbers game? Should just focus on my LSAT
at this point?

I have 2 yrs of WE and some debating experience and zip.(And played the violin in the orchestra, but I'm sure that 's not relevant)

Is there anyone with near zero EC like my self and got into HLS or CLS?

http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com

/thread.

[calicocat]

I don't get this

Cause the OP question was so silly, must be a flame.

[PunjabiLower]

Softs matter to law school the same way a girl's personality matters to guys. Which is to say not very much at all.

bad analogy

[roranoa]

.